Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: MSC photos

  1. #1
    Bemused...
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MIA
    Posts
    742

    MSC photos

    Is it just me? I find the watermarks / labels on the MSC photos totally distracting. I get it she doesn't want these photos to be used elsewhere, but crap, there's a reason no one else does that. I've seen a lot of good reviews about Jessy's agency, and some of her girls look great, BUT somehow, those diagonal strips of words down the pictures of her girls just distract me to the point where I can't focus on what's behind them, and I just give up. Maybe some of the girls look great, but I associate the bad stripes with them (???).

    Does anyone else have that problem? Or is my eyes-to-brain connection totally fucked up?

    The MERB ads also don't have enough information in them, forcing you to go to the website. Which is not ideal for mobile.

    Can we get a MERB petition to get rid of those damn watermarks??

    Then again, do I really need another agency?...

  2. #2
    The pictures have watermarks on them? I hadn't noticed.

  3. #3
    Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Northern emisphere
    Posts
    5,925
    Quote Originally Posted by johnybird View Post
    The pictures have watermarks on them? I hadn't noticed.
    Well johny you have has good of a eye sight as I do ,notice what ?


    Cheers


    Booker
    c

  4. #4
    Bemused...
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MIA
    Posts
    742
    It's not a watermark. But it's the website and phone number in grey across the photo. Is it my browser???

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by wolfie720 View Post
    those diagonal strips of words down the pictures of her girls just distract me to the point where I can't focus on what's behind them, and I just give up.
    See I see it the other way, The pictures of the girls distract me to the point where I can't focus on the diagonal bars or watermarks or logos in front of them. Kind of like those autostereogram's

    There's nothing wrong with your browser wolfie, just adjust what you're focusing on

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    854
    La qualité des photos est inversement proportionnel à la qualité de l'agence et de ses filles.

    Dommage.

    LL

  7. #7
    No Wolfie, it is not just you. I feel to much writing across the photo takes away from the lady and is quite annoying but I also appreciate why MSC does this for their girls and the success rate that Miss Jessy has had over the years speaks for itself so what do I know.

    Personally to moi as to what makes a great picture in this business is just being real and if you have hot ladies then going the natural route is the way to go, no heavy photoshop needed. Eleganza was the master at this back in their day and today i feel GoodGirls does this as good as anyone although I would love to see different backgrounds, props and better lighting from time to time. If words are needed across the front of a picture then i like how Asservissante and Xxxtase do it with very light wording and just one line of it, minus the moderate to heavy photoshopping.

    I want the girl in the actual picture to arrive at my door not the one that looks too good to be true in a photoshopped picture that usually is not as hot in person. Don't get me wrong, sometimes (depending on the agency) the girl is almost as hot as her heavily enhanced pic but with natural pictures you pretty much are never disappointed each and every time.

  8. #8
    The watermarks are a bit too much....I understand the reason for them, but it's very distracting and detracts from the beauty of the girls. Maybe something a bit more transparent and flat?

  9. #9
    Charmer, that is why i mentioned Asservissante and Xxxtase's pics. Take a look and see. Not very distracting at all the way they do it with the light colored wording and just the one line of it.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gotta love Montreal
    Posts
    333
    I feel the same way. Msc websites/pictures just doesnt give me the wow effect that would make me call them. I read a lot of good revies on their girls, but pictures never tempted me. Also, the pictures should be bigger, i feel like i cant "size" the girls enough...

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    339
    Personnelement , Je n'ai jamais été tenté de faire affaire avec MSC, principalement a cause de leurs photos qui me donne aucune idée claire de l'apparence des filles, je n'arrive pas a faire le focus sur la fille, ca me distrait toute ce superflus.

  12. #12
    I found it very annoying and distracting but anyways their girls are hot and pictures are accurate

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by lgna69xxx View Post

    no heavy photoshop needed. Eleganza was the master at this back in their day and today i feel GoodGirls does this as good as anyone although I would love to see different backgrounds, props and better lighting from time to time. If words are needed across the front of a picture then i like how Asservissante and Xxxtase do it with very light wording and just one line of it, minus the moderate to heavy photoshopping.

    I want the girl in the actual picture to arrive at my door not the one that looks too good to be true in a photoshopped picture that usually is not as hot in person. Don't get me wrong, sometimes (depending on the agency) the girl is almost as hot as her heavily enhanced pic but with natural pictures you pretty much are never disappointed each and every time.
    Amen brother Igmen! It is so critical that the girl that arrives at the door does not look less desirable than her pictures on the site. There is a delicate balance that the agencies have to consider. Photoshop too much (and you may have to do this to protect the identity) and you run the risk of disappointing a customer. I have noticed that when a GoodGirl arrives at my door they have always looked as good or better than their pictures. This was also true of Eleganza.

    My pet peeve is that I can't get the girl to arrive in the sexy lingerie they posed for in the pictures. I noticed that last time I met was Christina she wore the same stockings as in her pictures. I like that. Don't show the girl wearing sexy lingerie and have her show up in a pair of jeans and tennis shoes.

    One more thing. I believe that Mojo has raised the bar. They show the face in many pictures, they show tattoos as they are and they have added a video which I believe is much more difficult to photoshop or use fake pictures.

  14. #14
    Well Hungry, what the sp wears is pretty much up to her but I suggest you request a certain lingerie or outfit ahead of time, I suppose more and more ladies might be dressing down because of the new laws but could always bring something to change into if you request it I guess.

  15. #15
    Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Northern emisphere
    Posts
    5,925
    I am wondering do I prefer watermarks or mirror reflections with smartphones ?



    Regards




    Booker

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •