Massage Adagio
Montreal Escorts

man-receives-sex-act-while-blacked-out-gets-accused-of-sexual-assault

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,857
552
113
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/m...ets-accused-of-sexual-assault/article/2565978

Man receives sex act while blacked out, gets accused of sexual assault
BY ASHE SCHOW | JUNE 11, 2015 | 4:24 PM

An Amherst College student blacked out, accompanied a fellow student back to her dorm room after drinking in February 2012. While he was blacked out, she performed oral sex on him.

Nearly two years later, she would accuse him of sexual assault. And under Amherst's guilty-until-proven-innocent (and even then, as we'll see, still guilty) hearing standards, the accused student was expelled.

The accused student — using the pseudonym John Doe — is suing the college for denying him due process. His lawyer had discovered text messages that prove the accused student did not initiate the encounter and in no way sexually assaulted the accuser. Despite this evidence, the college refused to reopen Doe's case.

K.C. Johnson, co-author of the book about the Duke lacrosse rape hoax, obtained Doe's lawsuit as well as transcripts from the hearing that found him guilty. Johnson first describes Amherst's Kafkaesque sexual assault rules, which stated goal is to "empower victims" during hearings rather than determine the truth.

Johnson notes that the school has adopted the "yes means yes" definition of consent — meaning someone has to ask before performing any sexual act on another person and receive an affirmative response. But the standard provides no way for accused students to prove they obtained such consent. (For that matter, given that the sexual act was performed on the accused student, was there any evidence he provided affirmative consent?)

The school also requires drunk students engaging in sexual activity to "be aware of the other person's level of intoxication" and warns students that "an individual may experience a blackout state in which he/she/they appear to be giving consent, but do not actually have conscious awareness or the ability to consent." Johnson asks how an accused student is supposed to have been aware of another's intoxication or known they were in a "black out state," as Amherst doesn't provide an explanation.

The entire adjudication process at Amherst, revised after another student claimed the school mistreated her sexual assault accusation, was designed to find guilt, Johnson wrote. An accused student may hire an attorney, but that attorney cannot say anything during the hearing. An accused student may receive a campus "adviser" who "is not an advocate for the student." Meanwhile, the accuser's adviser is absolutely their advocate.

For Doe, his "adviser" was an administrator who lacked tenure and was trained in "social justice education." Doe was not allowed to directly cross-examine his accuser and could only write down questions for the panel to ask her, leaving no room for follow-ups. The hearing panel, meanwhile, was made up of "student life officials" and another administrators trained in "social justice education" — none of whom had tenure.

The investigator of the sexual assault claim lacked the subpoena power to actually investigate. Had the investigator been able to properly investigate, they would have uncovered the text messages that proved there was no assault.


This is one of the few cases where we have an actually good idea of what happened the night in question. Doe accompanied the accuser (who was Doe's girlfriend's roommate) to her dorm room. The accuser performed oral sex on a blacked out Doe (Johnson notes that even the Amherst hearing found Doe's account of being blacked out "credible"). Doe leaves. The accuser then texted two people: First, a male student she had a crush on — whom she invited over after a heavily flirtatious exchange earlier in the evening. Then, a female friend.

The accuser said during her hearing that she only texted one friend to help her handle the assault as she felt "very alone and confused." But her texts with her female friend give no indication of an assault. Rather, the accuser texted her friend "Ohmygod I jus did something so fuckig stupid" [sic throughout]. She then proceeded to fret that she had done something wrong and her roommate would never talk to her again, because "it's pretty obvi I wasn't an innocent bystander."

She also complained that the other man, who had come over after the alleged assault, had taken until 5 in the morning to finally have sex with her.

The accuser found herself friendless after the encounter, when her roommate discovered what she had done.

Between the encounter with Doe and the accusation — nearly two years later — the accuser developed new friends. And as it happens, these new friends were all "victims' advocates."

When Doe discovered the text messages, he presented the findings to Amherst. The school refused to reopen his case. K.C. Johnson sums up the case perfectly:

"Once again: this is a case in which an accuser (to put it charitably) misrepresented written evidence vital to her credibility, and this same material, her words, showed — if anything — that she initiated sexual contact against a student who even Amherst's panel described as 'blacked out.,'" Johnson wrote. "And yet, according to Amherst, [the accuser] is a sexual assault 'survivor.'"

The case also shows how a male student can be accused of sexual assault even if the evidence suggests he might have been the one assaulted.
 

Halloween Mike

Original Dude
Apr 19, 2009
5,080
1,143
113
Winterfell
My brain feel like a big pile of spaghety after reading that...

So in clear word, dude get girl to her room, passed out because he was drunk, she then decided to suck him for ....(insert whatever reason), dude don't even know as he is asleep. Then for unknown reason 2 years later she fill a complain against him because ...?? There friend didn't want to speak to her anymore???

So more or less girl is thecnically the victime but actually the agressor, while dude is considered the agressor but is clearly the victime as he didn't do anything, hell he was passed out...

This makes no sense... At least please tell me the poor dude won't end up in jail..
 

PopeDover

New Member
Jul 3, 2009
298
0
0
deplorable basket case
For any young man desiring to improve his lot in life by going to college these days I highly recommend one of these

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chastity_belt_%28BDSM%29#/media/File:Carrara_klein_frontaal.jpg

On a more serious note, considering this guy was expelled, I can safely say that any guy enrolling at Amherst in the future does not deserve a penis, might as well have it surgically tucked in.

If I ever come across a resume in the future showing a degree from this school it's going right in the trash.

But I do really hope this innocent young woman recovers from her trauma.
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,857
552
113
Yep Mike, you got it correct. This is how the US has evolved and particularly on the college campuses. Rule of law doesn't seem to matter anymore. We can thank the leftist, Marxist, militant feminists for this. The same type of thinking that gave us C36. Do-gooders.
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,857
552
113
I am not talking about a woman raping a man (which clearly happened in this case). The big concern is the current wave of anti-white male militant feminist activism that has taken over the college campuses of North America. But I agree, wrong is wrong. And I think that people within the movement (feminists) will grow weary of this game. This is nucking futz!

It reminds me of the witch-hunt of the 80's-90's surrounding repressed memories and the child abuse convictions. This is where the social workers and psychiatrists talked children into testifying against their parents saying that they were sexually abused. Sean Penn produced a nice documentary called Witch Hunt about this.
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,857
552
113
i am watching Britt Hume and they are discussing this case. The university is following guidlines from the Federal Government and the young lady in question cannot be cross examoned because she may be intimidated. The left has said that 1 in 5 women are sexually assaulted during their college years. Sounds like the Duke Lacrosse case and the bogus rape at UVA that Rolling Stone reported. This is the kind of thing that happend during the cultural revolution in China or when the Nazis took over Germany. WTF
 

Merlot

Banned
Nov 13, 2008
4,117
0
0
Visiting Planet Earth
Hello all,

When I read this story yesterday I had the same reaction as Halloween Mike, it's so nuts it makes your brain ache. It's totally f'ed up.

i am watching Britt Hume and they are discussing this case. The university is following guidlines from the Federal Government and the young lady in question cannot be cross examoned because she may be intimidated. The left has said that 1 in 5 women are sexually assaulted during their college years. Sounds like the Duke Lacrosse case and the bogus rape at UVA that Rolling Stone reported. This is the kind of thing that happend during the cultural revolution in China or when the Nazis took over Germany. WTF

Britt Hume? :rolleyes:

You know Hungry, so far you've already blamed or connected this with Feminists, Liberals, Communists, and Nazis. Half of this group is the antithesis, political opposite of the other half, yet infer they're all the same mind. What are you going to blame this on next...zombies and aliens? What has happened is the Department of Education issued new rules guidelines lowering standards of proof in an effort to make it easier to protect women from sexual assault because previously it was extremely tough to do in a college campus culture environment where men generally got away with "boys will be boys" mentality in these educational systems. Where were your complaints when the advantage was all on the other side and the system of redress, prosecution, and punishment did to women what it is now grossly doing to this male victim? There was plenty of blaming the victim then too as even other women would persecute the female victims who were humiliated and driven out.

What has happened is a woman student made an accusation and because of the new standard being "more likely than not" (where have you heard that before) because of whatever story or evidence there was lead the college to expel a male student, we know now but the school had no good evidence of then, who was the real victim. It was only 13 months later, as noted in every article I can find, that the texts proving the female lied for some sort of embarrassing personal reasons and the guy is the real victim. I'm as perplexed and angry as any other reader of this case that the college somehow refuses to reopen the case. They are being freaking damn ridiculous. As it often happens in educational institutions Amherst has set up guidelines for hearing cases that are legally improper and deny individuals their Constitutional rights. It's an endemic attitude among these educational systems to set things up to seize control like an autonomous state, but to say it's because of Feminists, Liberals, Communists, and Nazis and whatever else one might try to dig out this episode is...misguided...to be gentle.

Many educational systems have a habit of acting like fiefdoms that feel free to exceed constitutional rights to protect their interests of personal survival, profits, and likely some misguided political, social, or religious philosophy beyond the laws of the state and country. In this case they are also 100% loathe to admit they made a mistake because of the publicity and legal settlement costs so they are sticking to what is now looking like an insane decision. They are out of their minds if they think this will hold up in court yet they are fools enough to stand by their earlier decision not because of being like Feminists, Liberals, Communists, and Nazis, but because they are arrogant and determined to preserve themselves even though their position is conversely self-damaging. They will get their punishment in the end.

I know Hungry you are a conservative. Fine. In looking around the web I see many conservative sites are going after this issue like wolves smelling blood to use it for their own political purpose. It's great fodder for them with a national election year coming up. You're entitled to your opinion and I respect that. But when anyone starts conjuring specters of Feminists, Liberals, Communists, and Nazis, etc (which don't fit together philosophically or ideologically)...I see someone digging into the nonsensical programmed Conservative demonology old file catalogs for answers instead of trying to look at the situation and be fair. WTF!

Cheers,

Merlot

(prediction...pile on)

BTW - source of the original the link in the first post is the Washington Examiner, which is "is owned by Denver billionaire Philip Anschutz[4] and which also owns the influential conservative opinion magazine The Weekly Standard."
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts