Most important part of the meeting

If I had to pick one it would be overall experience and chemistry. But factors you mentioned and others like a sense of humour, naughty mind, playfulness , attractive face and body including skin and teeth. Sweet and spicy, able to adapt, sexual animal, pretty and fresh smelling pussy etc. are all important factors in making the right fit.

Overall experience all the way like cloudy said. No biggie for me if SP may be weak in one area and makes up for it in another. As for DFK, surprisingly you will find different people have different mentalities as to what this, some descriptions I read I find fucking disgusting.

Price, obviously from a consumer stand point the more you get for the less you pay is awesome. Obviously, if the provider is charging a premium cost, I would hope that simple things like min, LFK, a solid BBBJ and 2 SOG in an hour session are standard parts of the deal.

I would also go with overall experience.
I would just add that after the first 5 minutes most times you know if you are going to have a fabulous time or not.
So far I have never had a bad experience with Montreal Indy’s, they are just gorgeous and great to be with.
I will not book if she doesn’t offer Bbbj and DFK.

If the overall experience is nice, pleasant and fun then I consider it a session worth my time and money. A nice delicious Y is a huge plus, and the biggest plus is if she can make Junior come inside her. I'm still a CIM virgin but I've been told it's one of the most pleasurable experience a man can have, beside the obvious.

,,..with non regular...in the FIRST minute ---the way she looks and smlies at me--the way she dressed---attitude----i already know if i will have good time......and most of the time it works :thumb:

dfk, DFK, and DFKKKKK.

A SP that knows how to french kiss passionately has usually a great attitude, is sensual and the chemistry will be easier.
And it means most of the time that all the rest of the session/service will be memorable (Overall Experience).
I don't remember having a bad encounter with a girl that knows how to DFK...

There are exceptions but for me, No DFK or LFK means no repeat.

When the arrangement to meet up at 7pm she shows up at 7pm. 7:10 pm at the latest. Not 7:30... not 7:45 and definitely not at 9 pm.

With all that is mentioned above with all the acronyms, chemistry and connection. Not even an issue and concern in Montreal if you did your homework. Plus not looking for a relationship and most likely we will never see each other again so I am not going to put too much emphasis and demands. When I was in the hobby I treated her like a person and sometimes I took her to a nice restaurant. Good meal and good genuine conversation flow. Afterwards everything just naturally flows.

I love a girl with a great personality and certainly there are certain sex acts that i really value. However, a girl who is a fantastic, passionate kisser can make me forget a range of faults in other areas.

Sounds like the jury has voted for "Overall experience " and I agree 100%. Its about how she looks, how she acts with you, how comfortable you are with each other and how strong the sexual chemistry is . Did you both enjoy yourselves? If yes then it's mission accomplished. For me a great session is about losing yourself in a passionate experience rather than accumulating a laundry list of services.

Yes. This!!!!

The Nature Boy said:

As for DFK, surprisingly you will find different people have different mentalities as to what this, some descriptions I read I find fucking disgusting.

Click to expand...

I find the DFK thing so hard to deal with. To some people, DFK is pretty normal kissing but honestly for others it's like your mouth is being assaulted. So the dilemma is what to say when asked if it's on the menu. The question itself often kind of worries me because the answer I give puts me in a tough situation if the gentleman's definition of DFK is different than mine. On the other hand, I think a lot of clients think that not agreeing to providing it means you are going to be cold and they won't get more than a quick peck on the lips. That acronym/service is really ambiguous. I wish there was an official definition everyone used. Lol

Just had to add my 2 cents, as i have had this issue a few times recently. In the end, i always have to say that DFK isn't offered, although I'm sure many people I have seen might feel they got DFK. I just don't want to put myself in a position where I promised something that I don't provide (tonsil hockey) and have someone feel like they got ripped off. All depends on what your definition of DFK is! Who knows?! It's a crappy situation lol I just kiss the way I always kiss!


In my opinion chemistry is always one of the most important things, if not the most important one. No chemistry means not a great experience. Chemistry is what makes it exciting.. IMHO.

Mlle Bijou said:

That acronym/service is really ambiguous. I wish there was an official definition everyone used. Lol

Click to expand...

Thank you for that, you are so right. It's often not clear what people expect from DFK

KylaAnderson said:

Thank you for that, you are so right. It's often not clear what people expect from DFK

Click to expand...

You know Einstein really wanted to focus his study on women and sex relation but he gave up due to the difficulty task at hand. He then turn to study easier stuff like the theory of relativityand and mass–energy equivalence which lead to formula E = mc2.

There is something that has never been defined which entitle a human being to want to deeply kiss another. It's hardly about look. It's a chemistry that has never been explained.

The only problem in this hobby is sp that use that never discovered theory excuse to fake dfk or deny it to everyone even if they listed it as a service... These girl should simply not be doing this...

Cheers,

This has always completely baffled me.

Doing anal, sucking someone’s dick and sitting on his face is ok, but DFK is too personal, WTF, or is this some strange way of saying yes I am doing all this for money but just to show you or remind myself that I really don’t give a crap about you, no DFK.

It is like going through all this and then worrying about drinking from your partners wine glass.
Seems too many SP. watched pretty woman instead of the Bachelor or Bachelorette.

Obviously it is always their choice, I am just not interested in the ones that play this game for whatever reason, which is my choice.

Fradi said:

This has always completely baffled me.

Doing anal, sucking someone’s dick and sitting on his face is ok, but DFK is too personal, WTF, or is this some strange way of saying yes I am doing all this for money but just to show you or remind myself that I really don’t give a crap about you, no DFK.

It is like going through all this and then worrying about drinking from your partners wine glass.
Seems too many SP. watched pretty woman instead of the Bachelor or Bachelorette.

Obviously it is always their choice, I am just not interested in the ones that play this game for whatever reason, which is my choice.

Click to expand...

In theory I agree with you Fradi but it seems women see it differently. I once had an sp tell me that kissing was far more intimate than getting pounded from behind. I suppose for some women dfk would be a real expression of affection in a way those other acts you described would not be.

Bbw hunter said:

I suppose for some women dfk would be a real expression of affection in a way those other acts you described would not be.

Click to expand...

DFK, that most YMMV of all the magical acronyms & euphemisms; but it seems to equate with "good chemistry" better than any other physical act, or such has been my experience.

What is DFK other than passionate, unrestrained kissing involving the tongue. Personally, I would replace DFK with DSK, or, simply put, "deeply satisfying kissing."

Hunter,

If they are so worried about an expression of affection, maybe they are in the wrong line of work.

I get that they may not like some acts as much as another I am fine with that, like I am not into anal, I will do it if the lady specifically wants it on the spur of the moment but I will never ask for it nor is it a huge turn on for me., DFK however is, but I am not the one getting paid or the one that chose this profession.

Again it is obviously their right to have whatever restriction they want, I will never book if I know in advance or never ask again if refused if it was simply stated as GFE. It is not my nature to make any woman feel uncomfortable or do anything that they don’t want to.
It doesn’t upset me I could just never understand the reasoning behind it and it is a shame because there is one lady I would very much like to see but....

Fradi said:

This has always completely baffled me.

Doing anal, sucking someone’s dick and sitting on his face is ok, but DFK is too personal, WTF, or is this some strange way of saying yes I am doing all this for money but just to show you or remind myself that I really don’t give a crap about you, no DFK.

It is like going through all this and then worrying about drinking from your partners wine glass.
Seems too many SP. watched pretty woman instead of the Bachelor or Bachelorette.

Obviously it is always their choice, I am just not interested in the ones that play this game for whatever reason, which is my choice.

Click to expand...

The thing is it has nothing to do with being personal. I kiss like I kiss in my personal life. I just have my own preferences and it's hard to guess what someone actually means by DFK. It's really about everyone's kissing 'style'. What I'm saying is that it's hard to promise a service when you don't know what the other person is actually expecting.

Like rimming, i don't enjoy it in my personal life so i don't offer it. The difference is that we both have the same definition of what rimming is. DFK, not so.

Mlle Bijou said:

The thing is it has nothing to do with being personal. I kiss like I kiss in my personal life. I just have my own preferences and it's hard to guess what someone actually means by DFK. It's really about everyone's kissing 'style'. What I'm saying is that it's hard to promise a service when you don't know what the other person is actually expecting.

Click to expand...

I don’t know how to explain it to you either, it is definitely not tonsil hockey as you put it.
What I can tell you is that I would rather just kiss with my ATF than all the other acronyms with another SP, she is that good at it, and it is more sensual and nothing like driving your tongue as far down the other ones throat.
Luckily her skills don’t just stop there.

Fradi said:

I don’t know how to explain it to you either, it is definitely not tonsil hockey as you put it.
.

Click to expand...

So we may have the same definition of DFK. I'm saying not everyone does.