BD, this article is another example of "good-doers" throwing everything in the same plate in order to justify their agenda. ANY DOCUMENT stating that everybody who do wathever "stuff" are this-and-that is extremely suspect to start with. This article is no exception and have
NO SCIENTIFIC OR STATISTICAL VALUE. It's a pile of crap, and it's piled quite high. Any document who's depicting a single side of events or peoples, from a single viewpoint, throwing everything in the same pot, without an equivalent counter position, is just crap.
I could probably write an article that would state the absolute opposite and,
WHOEVER WANT TO BELIEVE IT would see it as the Gospel truth, even if it would be based on thin air.
All this reminds me of a movie/cartoon (can't remember the title) starring a moose, a flying "squirrel" and the babe from Coyote Ugly: everybody get turned into zombies by boring TV programs...
Come on peoples! Where's your critical sense? Look at what's presented to you and learn to analyse the value of the information fed to you. It's not all caviar, there's lots of shit in there! Even "real" shit, the one resulting from food, can possibly be turned to something that look good with enough processing but it will still be shit. We just need to learn to recognize it if we don't want anybody serving it to us. Same goes with ideas and opinions: some can be processed to look like the truth, but they're still misinformation.
So, is a gangbang degrading? IMHO, it's only degrading if the participants think it is. Obviously, the woman in this occasion don't think it is: she even see it being valorizing since she is after a record! Will any of the dudes see it as degrading the woman they'll fuck? That you can bet! Some will think: "There! You slut! You're getting what you desserve!" and will ram her as hard as possible, no matter if she's getting sore. Degrading in the dude's eyes but the woman is accepting willingly so, not degrading to her! Same as sado-masochism! Not my type of event but if they like it that way!
In the second page, just above the "blood test" statement, the # of BB cum inside guys is now 25, not the 50 of page 1.