Velvet Love mtl
Montreal Escorts

What % of your encounters were a waste?

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
I am curious to know what percentage of your encounters would you consider a waste of your time and money. This could be SPs or MPs. If I were honest, I'd say 25% to 30% of all my encounters were a waste of my time & money, 60% were average to above average and 10% were exceptional.

GG
 

Big Daddy

New Member
Mar 16, 2003
177
0
0
Visit site
My statistics is similar to yours. However, my statistics is somewhat old because I am retired from this hobby for last 8 months and with recent HSV-2 scare, it seems permanent.
 

NYClimber

NYClimber
May 9, 2005
110
0
16
%

For me I'd say 10% were a waste of time:( , 50% were average:rolleyes: , 30% were exceptional:) and 10% were phenomenal:D .

NYC
 

Love big tits

New Member
Sep 1, 2006
626
0
0
My statistics are not really telling because I have not seen a great variety of SPs.

I tend to remember the good ones, the best kind, especially since I will repeat those. So it tends to jog my memory:p

The bad ones I had 2 so far thanks to this board and all you guys, and I thank you all for that.

The average ones, I have forgotten. Proof to that is the fact that I saw a lady a second time that was average just for the fact that my memory of names is so bad when I don't pay attention:eek:

But I am still at it, so good encounter is 70%, the majority at least in my mind, taking into account that I saw the same girls many many times.
 

malboro_man

Active Member
Feb 24, 2005
307
94
43
General Gonad said:
I am curious to know what percentage of your encounters would you consider a waste of your time and money.

GG

Using the same rating, my breakdown is:

total waste: 23.5%
avg to above avg: 70.6%
exceptional: 5.9%
 

johnmbot

Banned
Oct 16, 2004
780
0
0
118
6' under
malboro_man said:
Using the same rating, my breakdown is:

total waste: 23.5%
avg to above avg: 70.6%
exceptional: 5.9%
ummm, i think the general meant *exactly*...
 

hobby11

New Member
Jan 10, 2005
289
0
0
for me it s at least 80%

i dont know about you but for me it s 80% at least
and for the 20% i only repeat in half
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
so where are the bad reviews???

So far this thread indicates that a good percentage of your encounters were a waste. Interestingly, this is not reflected in the reviews because most people - and I am guilty as sin on this - are not comfortable slamming a lady publicly. I think it's because we empathize with the difficulty of their job and we do not want to overtly hinder their livelihood.

GG
 

malboro_man

Active Member
Feb 24, 2005
307
94
43
General Gonad said:
So far this thread indicates that a good percentage of your encounters were a waste. ...... I think it's because we empathize with the difficulty of their job and we do not want to overtly hinder their livelihood.

GG

General: I am along the same line of thinking as you. The girl could have had a bad day or bad previous encounter. I realize that they are not machines. I am reluctant to give a negative review unless it's really really bad.
 

hormone

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2007
1,029
141
63
I also am along the same lines (25-30% waste, 10-15% grrrreat! and the rest OK to pretty good). But waste does not mean the girl should get a bad review. I would only consider writing a bad review if the encounter was a waste because of the girl's attitude, hygiene, bad performance or something akin to being totally stoned. But I will count as a waste an encounter where I simply did not click with the girl or if I find her much less attractive than I thought I would--that is my no 1 reason for unhappy endings...
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
hormone said:
I would only consider writing a bad review if the encounter was a waste because of the girl's attitude, hygiene, bad performance or something akin to being totally stoned. But I will count as a waste an encounter where I simply did not click with the girl or if I find her much less attractive than I thought I would--that is my no 1 reason for unhappy endings...

Very valid point you raise here.

GG
 

breadman

Mr. Big
Jan 2, 2004
1,125
0
36
Visit site
Have to say about 25% of escorts don't seem to work out...with 35% being a great amount of fun. The middle percent...your happy with your selection but they just forgot to bring the bells and whistles.

Now in Germany the numbers are 10%, 65% and 25% for the middle. Think it has to do with being able to meet the girls in person before deciding.
 

mr_scorpio

Active Member
Nov 15, 2006
207
183
43
waste ................ 22%
average ............. 39%
above average .... 22%
exceptional ......... 17%
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,561
28
48
48
Where I belong.
General Gonad said:
I am curious to know what percentage of your encounters would you consider a waste of your time and money. This could be SPs or MPs. If I were honest, I'd say 25% to 30% of all my encounters were a waste of my time & money, 60% were average to above average and 10% were exceptional.
Wow!! Just do the math. When one considers that GG was posting 2-3 glowing reviews per week, this would suggest that he was seeing 20-30 girls each week.
 

Rango

New Member
Jun 17, 2005
50
0
0
I guess Ive Been Lucky

Hi fellow Merbites,

For me only 10% were a waste of time and money. When I started the hobby I met an awesome young lady and she was loved up repeatedly. When she left the scene I had a hard time finding someone like her. Although Sammy sounds a lot like her. I pulled my comments on her when she started her new career.

Lion Heart seems to have a good list of ladies.

What's the latest Lion Heart? Did EC ever return?

Rango
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
rumpleforeskiin said:
Wow!! Just do the math. When one considers that GG was posting 2-3 glowing reviews per week, this would suggest that he was seeing 20-30 girls each week.

Yeah right...more like I felt compelled to inflate some of my experiences because the ladies wanted nice reviews.:rolleyes:

GG
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,561
28
48
48
Where I belong.
General Gonad said:
Yeah right...more like I felt compelled to inflate some of my experiences because the ladies wanted nice reviews.:rolleyes:
Where I come from, the folks call that shilling.:eek:
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
rumpleforeskiin said:
Where I come from, the folks call that shilling.:eek:

Shilling???:confused: For me, shilling is when you lie about everything and deliberately try to misrepresent the truth to bait unsuspecting clients. I never lied about my experiences but the truth is I did inflate some of my reviews to a certain extent. Like I said, most of the times it was because I wanted to remain nice to the ladies and there were selfish reasons too. I thought that if I developed a "rep", I was going to get a better service. I am telling you, when I think back at this whole experience, I often remind myself of what an idiot I was.:rolleyes:

GG
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,164
2,466
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
In the last 8 years I would say probably only 3 or 4 I would consider a total waste of time (very small %), however I think my research skills are very thorough and this is one reason why. A lot of the guys who have high % of wasted encounters either are terribly lazy with their research or else they have unrealistic and/or extremely high expectations, artificially boosted by paying too much attention to the wrong things. We have seen numerous examples of this, including the incredibly naive belief that certain B&S agencies advertising on MERB "must be highly professional since they advertise on MERB, and MERB would only allow advertising from 1st rate agencies." This is what I call the "Idiot Factor", and if you throw out the Idiot Factor (as you must) and look only at stats from serious hobbyists who exchange info with each other, the true and accurate wasted encounter % indices are very low. In fact I think you have a better chance of being attacked and killed by a black bear than having a bad encounter if your research is thorough, careful, intelligent, and pays attention to the right things.

If you analyze thoroughly the post of Doc Holliday you will see that some of his bad encounters could have been avoided, including the one where he saw the thoroughly poorly reviewed SP out of curiousity. This would be discounted from counting under my analytical model.
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts