Improving the selection process on this forum
I made an earlier suggestion that the agencies should consider migrating their website photos of their girls to videos but it may be a while before they ever catch on.
The randomness of the Montreal selection process is what bugs me the most about heading up there.
a) The guys/women on the phone don't give accurate descriptions of who works there.
b) Some agencies don't perform an edits and say to women: "You meet the standards for this agency. You don't meet the standards for this agency." This results in very uneven service and selection standards.
c) What photos there are are often retouched and Photoshoped.
The higher end agencies supposedly have standards and the fact that they can charge what they do and get away with it is proof that this is a problem in need of a solution and guys will pay to get rid of this randomness.
The result is that calling an agency is like opening a box of chocolate. You never know what you are going to get.
It also has the effect on me of not wanting to take too many chances and sticking with girls who I know. I book multiple hour sessions with them instead of exploring.
Then add to this the fact that we all have different tastes and preferences. One man's outstanding is another's acceptable or sub-standard.
My ratio of bad/sub-standard sessions as a proportion of all sessions in Montreal is something like 30%. In Germany where I have a chance to assess the offering, meet the women first and have conversations with them, its more like 10%.
Alors, quoi faire?
Then I had a thought: why can't we move towards Amazon.com type reviews?
If you buy a book on amazon.com they make suggestions: "If you bought this book, you might want to check this out too. Or: Buyers of this book also bought the following."
Some guys are very new to this and don't have points of referral when they say that a chick was very good or very bad.
Somehow understanding the mongering resumes of posters while reading their reviews would put this all in perspective and help us all avoid unacceptable sessions.
Well good for you
I don't know what basis you have for comparison to say you have eliminated bad dates.
Originally Posted by Daringly
What would you consider good versus bad? What does your mongering resume look like? How many sessions over what span of time?
My primary basis for comparison is primarily German FKK clubs where the women are nude, live and in your face.
My selection process in Germany consists of sitting down and having a conversation first before committing to anything.
I can tell you that this process works very well.
Relying on descriptions over the phone, website photos and reviews here doesn't work as well.
Last edited by jackyo8193; 08-13-2007 at 07:49 PM.
There must be a way to make this work
There are breast guys, leg guys, etc.. We all have our preferences.
Originally Posted by SeeCupRider
If there was software which made correlations, one could create a list of women to see based on these prefences.
"If you like large breasted women and you liked say, Marie, then you should also try Sophie and Claire."
Finding like minded reviewers would be close enough. You'd simply dig up their prior reviews and voila!
Renowned SATIN DREAMZ
Originally Posted by SeeCupRider
When I was escorting, to help the clients, I was telling them:
1-When you meet someone you really like, go and see in her thread who else as like her as much as you, meaning about the same cretarias;
2-Go see the profile of this person and check who else he did see and appreciated for the same cretarias;
3-Take a look at this new thread were this person has reviewed her and you will see if others had the same to say about the lady.
Not bad the idea ?