View Poll Results: Which girl is more attractive? (see links below, in the 1st post)

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • Elise , the one with thinner thighs

    7 20.59%
  • Megane,the one with stronger thighs

    5 14.71%
  • don't know / don't care / don't understand / Get a life, Ducon!

    15 44.12%
  • links are not working anymore / photos really are identical now

    7 20.59%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Please vote: Which of these 2 girls is more attractive?

  1. #1

    Please vote: Which of these 2 girls is more attractive?

    Here are 2 photos of very similar ladies.
    They are so similar, the only difference is the thighs.

    Elise, from Montreal Sex City, has thinner thighs:
    http://www.montrealsexcity.com/photos/elise1.jpg
    Megane, from Babi-o-spa, has stronger thighs:
    http://www.babi-o-spa.com/photos/megane05.jpg

    Please vote, tell which one you think is more attractive.
    Don't try to find out which one is photoshopped, don't just vote for the one you think is real. We'll talk about that later.
    This is just a blind test,
    just vote for the one you think is more attractive.

    The reason I'm doing this vote will be explained a bit later in a personal rant in another post.

  2. #2

    now, the explanation

    Do did you vote?
    if you did, now you can read my explanation.

    I get really pissed of when a girl tells me "I don't like my legs, they are too fat"
    Who decided that legs should be thin? Where did they get that idea from?
    Is it really what men want?
    Or is it what girls tell each other ? or the impression they get from the fashion magazines ( made by women I suspect ) with anorexic girls on the cover?

    I like strong curvaceous feminine legs, strong thighs and calves, and I wonder why women think otherwise.
    First, I want to know what men really prefer ( hence the poll )
    then I want to know who decided to photoshop this girl's thighs to make them thinner. Is it a woman ?
    is it really worth it?
    Falsifying a photo is one thing, but falsifying to make it less attractive ??
    Some people's criteria for beauty are really weird, I wonder where they come from.

  3. #3
    "oh, it's the same girl and same photo, so I vote for the 4th option"

    ok, for those who don't understand the sarcasm, I'll make it more clear:
    It is different versions of the same photo, one has been digitally modified. They are different.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    montreal/toronto/miame
    Posts
    6
    Both are very nice. Amazing ass but the first one has better lighting

  5. #5

    Thumbs down

    I'd do them both!

    GG

  6. #6
    I am me, too!
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    If only I knew...
    Posts
    2,214
    I'd say they are both "photoshopped"! Hard to say for shure without being able to see "bigger picture".

    The girl might be cute, no matter the tighs/ass but the "photoshop" job make both pictures unattractive to me because the job is poorly done and I can't get myself to appreciate something not real.

    I do know "curvacious" girls who are "hot"!

  7. #7
    Classy, Pretty & Sexy GFE Montreal Sex City's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    3,267
    Quote Originally Posted by Ducon
    Do did you vote?
    if you did, now you can read my explanation.

    I get really pissed of when a girl tells me "I don't like my legs, they are too fat"
    Who decided that legs should be thin? Where did they get that idea from?
    Is it really what men want?
    Or is it what girls tell each other ? or the impression they get from the fashion magazines ( made by women I suspect ) with anorexic girls on the cover?

    I like strong curvaceous feminine legs, strong thighs and calves, and I wonder why women think otherwise.
    First, I want to know what men really prefer ( hence the poll )
    then I want to know who decided to photoshop this girl's thighs to make them thinner. Is it a woman ?
    is it really worth it?
    Falsifying a photo is one thing, but falsifying to make it less attractive ??
    Some people's criteria for beauty are really weird, I wonder where they come from.


    One thing I can say for sure ...
    Both pictures shows a lady that weight 120 lbs
    and not 105 lbs like were she was listed before ...

    http://www.montrealsecretaffairs.com/mia.htm

    I have voted # 3 !
    Last edited by Montreal Sex City; 09-25-2007 at 02:36 AM.
    Miss Jessy & The Classy, Pretty & Sexy Ladies! ¤ www.montrealsexcity.com ¤ Twitter
    Agency Reputation 2011-2012-2013
    GFE of the Year 2010-2011-2012
    Best Owners/Bookers 2011-2012

    514-234-1286 Thanks! Merci!

  8. #8
    Agent Smith - Mr Anderson ZoneAlarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    120
    Quote Originally Posted by Jessy xxx
    One thing I can say for sure ...
    Both pictures shows a lady that weight 120 lbs
    and not 105 lbs like were she was listed before ...

    http://www.montrealsecretaffairs.com/mia.htm
    I have voted # 3 !
    Jessy is right, i voted #3 aswell, also Duncan, i hope ur not turning into a Mini Robertpal
    Last edited by ZoneAlarm; 09-25-2007 at 02:54 AM.

  9. #9
    Agent Smith - Mr Anderson ZoneAlarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    120
    Quote Originally Posted by Ziggy Montana
    105 lbs per leg is accurate, I would say. (stie que j'suis chien dès fois)
    What is the point of an immature statement like this one? (Stie qu'il a des gens stupide des fois.)

    I voted #3 in the modified Poll ''
    don't know / don't care / don't understand / Get a life, Ziggy Montana''
    Last edited by ZoneAlarm; 09-25-2007 at 02:57 AM.

  10. #10
    ‹^› ‹(•¿•)› ‹^› Special K's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Red Sox Nation
    Posts
    5,108
    Put both pictures next to eachother and click on them, you'll be able to see the Elise picture had some meat removed from the rear of her right leg and the lighting has been enhanced. Not a big deal really but photoshopped nonetheless.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by ZoneAlarm
    Jessy is right, i voted #3 aswell, also Duncan, i hope ur not turning into a Mini Robertpal
    No you don't. You'd love another robertpal. Don't lie.
    You love spending your time flaming him when you could just ignore him instead.
    By the way, who is Duncan?

    Oh yes, Jessy is right to use the "yeah but others are liars too" excuse to falsify a photo.
    Since when was this ever a valid excuse?? It's pathetic.

    Now if some hobbyists start defending the practice of falsifying pictures, the situation is even worse than I thought..

    So Jessy, whose idea was it?

  12. #12
    If you look at this pic, you see that she is a little chunky in the trunky:

    http://www.babi-o-spa.com/photos/megane06.jpg

    I'd still do her.

    GG

  13. #13
    Classy, Pretty & Sexy GFE Montreal Sex City's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    3,267
    Quote Originally Posted by Ducon
    No you don't. You'd love another robertpal. Don't lie.
    You love spending your time flaming him when you could just ignore him instead.
    By the way, who is Duncan?

    Oh yes, Jessy is right to use the "yeah but others are liars too" excuse to falsify a photo.
    Since when was this ever a valid excuse?? It's pathetic.

    Now if some hobbyists start defending the practice of falsifying pictures, the situation is even worse than I thought..

    So Jessy, whose idea was it?

    Mr. Ducon,

    I always like these kind of discussions you know,
    yes that you know too well.

    So I guess that we are all a greater falsifyers out there since light
    is use at the right place, filters are also use on the pics, tattoos are
    removed, ajustement of the color of the skin is done to remove beauty
    marks, birth marks, scars etc... And why do we do this ? To keep the
    idendity of the lady secret. And I guess you never tought about this.

    Oh so lyers we are all, were is the juge so then we get all sentenced ! ...

    It's all good for me, as usual I assume what I do.
    But what you don't know is Elise and I know each other for more then
    2 years now and knowing this picture ain't recent, I have took the
    decision to make it a bit accurate. Since client wish to have temporary
    pics instead of nothing, I requested one from Elise till the photographer
    comes back from his trip.

    Thanks Ducon for comparing both pictures. Thanks for revealing where
    she works the rest of the time, thanks for exposing Elise to this.

    She is coming to work today, I will tell her about your nice unpleasant
    action and it may just result to removing her pic, not having anymore
    (just in case you would then want to compare the old ones and the new)
    and above, just to make sure no one finds out who she really is, in a
    no-review policy wish.

    Have a nice day Ducon, and I do still think you need a life.

    Last edited by Montreal Sex City; 09-25-2007 at 11:29 AM. Reason: Adding smilies ! ah ah ah !
    Miss Jessy & The Classy, Pretty & Sexy Ladies! ¤ www.montrealsexcity.com ¤ Twitter
    Agency Reputation 2011-2012-2013
    GFE of the Year 2010-2011-2012
    Best Owners/Bookers 2011-2012

    514-234-1286 Thanks! Merci!

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Jessy xxx
    She is coming to work today, I will tell her about your nice unpleasantaction and it may just result to removing her pic, not having anymore
    (just in case you would then want to compare the old ones and the new)
    and above, just to make sure no one finds out who she really is, in a
    no-review policy wish.

    Have a nice day Duncon, and I do still think you need a life.
    Jessy,

    It was only a matter of time before people found out. I suggest you use another pic next time you introduce a lady who also works at an erotic massage parlor.

    GG

  15. #15
    Veteran of Misadventures
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    13,145
    Quote Originally Posted by ZoneAlarm
    Their is not one agency website that does not photoshop their photo's not 1. Some do it simply to cover the face, other's to fix lighting, remove tatoo's. I dont think any of you an deny this right? So whats the big deal with Jessy fixing a 'temporary' photo of a girl who is in my opinion very good looking before and after.
    Ducon,

    ZA is right that there is not a single agency that does not photoshop their photos to protect potentially identifying features like tattoos, piercings etc. If they didn't photoshop the pics, they would arguably be invading the lady's privacy unless she consented to have untouched pics posted. It is not by any means an industry standard to post untouched pics. In fact, several agencies that have not been careful in this regard ended up with problems when family members or friends identified the escort through the untouched pics, leading the escort to leave the business after having been "outed."

    Ducon, there are B&S agencies out there which are posting FAKE pics, i.e., the girl in the pic is not even the same lady. Instead of wasting your time and energy on a thread like this, why don't you invest some time and energy into exposing those agencies - which, by the ways, there are many such agencies out there waiting for you to expose them. But MSC is not one of them.
    Last edited by EagerBeaver; 09-25-2007 at 01:28 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •