Montreal Escorts

The picture thread

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
Where are your pics?:confused:

I am tired of seeing ladies with no bloody pics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

GG
 
Feb 3, 2007
41
0
0
On se calme

GG,

Has it occured to you that maybe I hired these girls yesterday afternoon? Maybe I want to see how their service and attitude are towards my customers before I spend 100$ per girl on a photo shoot? Oh yeah and also having to coordinate my schedule with the girls' schedules and also the photographers' schedule all at once? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: I think it is only logical. Don't you?

D.

General Gonad said:
Where are your pics?:confused:

I am tired of seeing ladies with no bloody pics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

GG
 

YoungStud

New Member
May 14, 2005
26
0
0
You don't have to pay a photog anything. Take a digital camera, and take a few pics. They are better, and probably more realistic, than any photograph from a pro.
 

supertony

New Member
Apr 24, 2007
3
0
1
Natasha - GFE+++

No worry about the picture - She is competable to Morgan
You will not regret.

Thank you D. I trust you
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
I am calm...

Darrell @ Magnetic said:
Has it occured to you that maybe I hired these girls yesterday afternoon? Maybe I want to see how their service and attitude are towards my customers before I spend 100$ per girl on a photo shoot? Oh yeah and also having to coordinate my schedule with the girls' schedules and also the photographers' schedule all at once? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: I think it is only logical. Don't you?

Darell,

These are all excuses. You hire them and "test them" without giving your customers the opportunity to see how they look. Why don't you first take the pics and then hold off a week like John of Eleganza? A couple of hundred bucks is not a big deal.:rolleyes:

GG

P.S. I am NOT singling you out. Carlo of Montreal Hot Angels is the worst in terms of posting pics on his site. Some agency owners are slacking when it comes to pics and it's starting to piss me off.
 

loves-women

Active Member
May 25, 2004
283
68
28
Visit site
General Gonad said:
Darell,

These are all excuses. You hire them and "test them" without giving your customers the opportunity to see how they look. Why don't you first take the pics and then hold off a week like John of Eleganza? A couple of hundred bucks is not a big deal.:rolleyes:

GG

P.S. I am NOT singling you out. Carlo of Montreal Hot Angels is the worst in terms of posting pics on his site. Some agency owners are slacking when it comes to pics and it's starting to piss me off.

Waaaaaa Waaaaaaa.......
Seriously dude, there are way more important issues in the world out there than you not being able to see a prostitute's picture before you fuck her!!!:D

Darrell is a pretty straight forward guy and I am sure most of the guys here would agree.

The difference between Darrell and Carlo is that Darrell does not "twist" the truth. (Ooops, did I just call Carlo a liar?? My bad.)

John takes his own pictures of his girls. Darrell uses a professional photographer. You cannot blame Darrell for being cautious with his money. That is his prerogative.

Darrell works with just 1-3 girls at any given time, it does not take much to keep his ladies busy.

Even if you never call Darrell for a girl I am sure that more than enough guys out there will fill the gap.
 

mark_sab

Member
Mar 9, 2006
55
0
6
visuals

it is true that 50% of the human brain is dedicated to eye sight. my guess is, that for some of the members of this board, this number is larger.
 

Nice Guy

New Member
Jun 6, 2006
9
0
0
General Gonad said:
Darell,

These are all excuses. You hire them and "test them" without giving your customers the opportunity to see how they look. Why don't you first take the pics and then hold off a week like John of Eleganza? A couple of hundred bucks is not a big deal.:rolleyes:

GG

P.S. I am NOT singling you out. Carlo of Montreal Hot Angels is the worst in terms of posting pics on his site. Some agency owners are slacking when it comes to pics and it's starting to piss me off.

You are signaling him out. That is why you posted. You could have mentioned Devilish, xxxtase, and many others that have delayed pictures more than a few days. Why didn't you?
 

Mod 4

New Member
Apr 12, 2004
209
3
0
MERB
As some of you have noticed (and some have not), there are new rules in place for the "MERB Advertisers Only" section. A lounge topic will be created for this subject later today. One of the subjects of that thread will be photo requests.

For now, this thread will remain in the lounge, but don't expect it to be open for long.

M4
 

z/m(Ret)

New Member
Feb 28, 2007
1,676
3
0
General Gonad said:
Where are your pics?:confused:

I am tired of seeing ladies with no bloody pics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

GG
How do you manage to see them if there are no pics?
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
The trend towards posting ladies with no pics seems here to stay. I wonder if the board should force all agencies to take pics before introducing ladies. No pics, then you're not allowed to introduce a lady.

There are plently of ways to take pics of someone while keeping their identities secret. If a lady is too sensitive about pics, then maybe she shouldn't be an SP.:rolleyes:

GG
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,561
28
48
48
Where I belong.
General Gonad said:
The trend towards posting ladies with no pics seems here to stay. I wonder if the board should force all agencies to take pics before introducing ladies. No pics, then you're not allowed to introduce a lady.
Yeah, I agree completely. And if they refuse, we'll turn them into the RCMP. Or the Department of Hobbyland Security.
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
No pics, no advertising rights!!!

rumpleforeskiin said:
Yeah, I agree completely. And if they refuse, we'll turn them into the RCMP. Or the Department of Hobbyland Security.

I think it is time to discuss this matter seriously. If the agency owners keep introducing ladies with no pics and suffer no repercussions, then they'll keep doing it. I propose that they should be forced to provide pics of each and every lady. Any serious replies on this topic are welcome. For the rest of you, there is always that damn Yankees thread.:D

GG
 

metoo4

I am me, too!
Mar 27, 2004
2,183
2
0
If only I knew...
So funny!! Plain and simple market laws! You want to see the pics of girls before you meet them? Just boycott agency/girls who don't post pics fast enough for you! Of course, this would leave you with... no agency! All agencies have girls who don't have pics and will never have pics.

It's a free world after all so, who are you to pick what a girl does with her life? A lady doesn't want pics? So what! She know she will miss on some good occasions but she accept it.

An agency doesn't post fast enough? Then just wait till there's pics! Nobody's forcing you to pick ladies without pictures! As far as you're concerned, you just have to imagine these "no pics" ladies don't exist and they only start existing when they have pics posted!

But of course.. Oh, the Great General Gonad, you won't get down to that level! Imagine, the General waiting for something who is due to him! I dare any agency depriving you from you rights! Your wrath they'll suffer!
 

z/m(Ret)

New Member
Feb 28, 2007
1,676
3
0
Ridiculous

Why can't it be as simple as each client decides for himself if he's ok or not to book ladies with no pics?
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,199
0
0
Ziggy Montana said:
Why can't it be as simple as each client decides for himself if he's ok or not to book ladies with no pics?

It can't really be said any better than that.

If someone really insists on pictures, there are pretty of agencies out there that have pics on their site. You can even find agencies that have amazing pictures that aren't even photos of their ladies! :cool:

I don't see how the board can force an agency to conduct their advertising in a certain way. It makes no sense for an agency to spend money shooting photos of a girl who doesn't work out. If you don't want to book a lady without photos, then don't book her. It's that simple.

Techman
 
Toronto Escorts