Montreal Escorts

Should agencies be forced to provide pics of each lady?

Should agencies be forced to provide pics of each lady?

  • Yes, no pics of all SPs then no right to advertise here

    Votes: 9 25.0%
  • No, agencies should not be forced to provide pics of all SPs

    Votes: 7 19.4%
  • Leave it up to the SPs' discretion

    Votes: 18 50.0%
  • It does not matter since the truth will eventually come out

    Votes: 2 5.6%

  • Total voters
    36

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
I am following up on my "pictures thread" to ask the members of this board a question: should agencies be forced to provide pics of each lady? In particular, should the board implement a new rule that any agency that does not provide pics of all the SPs working for them should not be allowed to advertise here?

Let me know what you think.

GG
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,561
28
48
48
Where I belong.
I wanna be there when you tell Fred that he's not allowed to take the money of an agency that doesn't post it's pictures promptly.
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
Who cares about what Fred Zed thinks?!?!

rumpleforeskiin said:
I wanna be there when you tell Fred that he's not allowed to take the money of an agency that doesn't post it's pictures promptly.

Uuuummmm, I don't care about what Fred Zed thinks. The success of his board depends on his ability to attract members, not agencies who provide no pics.:rolleyes:

GG
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
Dee said:
What I would apppreciate from the owners is an indication when they post about a new girl that there is presently no photo on the site... this saves me the frustration of looking for it.

At the very least, but I still think too many owners jump the gun, introducing ladies with no pics. If a client is going to fork over money to rent a room and call an SP, the least an agency owner can do is spend some money on a photo shoot and stop giving us excuses of why they can't coordinate schedules or find their webmasters who are vacationing in Mexico.:rolleyes:

GG
 

Love big tits

New Member
Sep 1, 2006
626
0
0
too many owners jump the gun, introducing ladies with no pics

I definetly agree with your statement and I would love myself to see pictures pronto and would have booked many ladies much earlier and more often (since I like to repeat)

but

I think it is still going on that way because they are still customers booking the girls with no pictures, probably less so, but the owner and the SP are still making money in the mean time.

Let's not forget also ladies who do not want pictures period. But that is an other story
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
Love big tits said:
I think it is still going on that way because they are still customers booking the girls with no pictures, probably less so, but the owner and the SP are still making money in the mean time.

Let's not forget also ladies who do not want pictures period. But that is an other story


LBT,

There are ways to take pics and still guard a lady's privacy. At least show us her body.:rolleyes: This practice is still going on because Merbites are not demanding that agencies with no pics should not be allowed to advertise. Unless we demand it, the owners will keep introducing ladies with no pics.

GG
 

naughtylady

New Member
Nov 9, 2003
2,079
2
0
57
montreal
General Gonad said:
Uuuummmm, I don't care about what Fred Zed thinks. The success of his board depends on his ability to attract members, not agencies who provide no pics.:rolleyes:

GG


YOU are forgetting that Fred makes his money from the advertisers and not from the members.

Heck some JdM agencies and indies have no pics no web site and still are reviewed here.

Ronnie,
Naughtylady
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
naughtylady said:
YOU are forgetting that Fred makes his money from the advertisers and not from the members.

Heck some JdM agencies and indies have no pics no web site and still are reviewed here.

And who do the advertisers make their money from? On your other point, I wouldn't allow reviews of non-paying advertisers. Why give them free exposure?

GG
 

stacey.1985

New Member
Sep 29, 2007
6
1
0
Well I think the lady should be able to choose if she wants to have her picture on the internet. Some prefer no pictures of the face, while others hide there face.

Remember that some of us are still in college or university :) Or others are teachers :p
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
stacey.1985 said:
Remember that some of us are still in college or university :) Or others are teachers :p

Can you tutor me?:p

GG

P.S. You can still hide faces in pics.;)
 

Special K

‹^› ‹(•¿•)› ‹^›
May 3, 2003
5,079
4
38
Red Sox Nation
Visit site
I don't think an agency should be forced to provide pictures of the girls, would it make things better for the client? Of course it would but it should be completely up to the discretion of the provider whether or not they want pictures out there. Would it be better for that providers business...most definitely but in rare cases such as with Marika of Xxxtase I don't think it makes a difference. There's no pics of her but from all the amazing things I've heard about her from very reliable sources I would be honored to meet her without having seen a picture.

In most cases it will definitely benefit their business if they have some picture rather than none, even a digital cam pic would suffice if there's a delay in getting a professional photographer.
 

metoo4

I am me, too!
Mar 27, 2004
2,183
2
0
If only I knew...
You know GG, you should start your own website! It could be named MORAESRB!

My Own Ranting About Escorts Stuff Review Board.

You could be the owner, president-director-General, mod, web designer, head of marketing, censorship board, rule maker, judge and jury...

Of course, it would be a lonely job, with almost no advertizer, almost no members... But hey! If that's what it takes so you have it your way, I think it's worth a try!

For now, not much you can do!
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,561
28
48
48
Where I belong.
metoo4 said:
You know GG, you should start your own website! It could be named MORAESRB!

My Own Ranting About Escorts Stuff Review Board.

You could be the owner, president-director-General, mod, web designer, head of marketing, censorship board, rule maker, judge and jury...

Of course, it would be a lonely job, with almost no advertizer, almost no members... But hey! If that's what it takes so you have it your way, I think it's worth a try!

For now, not much you can do!
If GG put as much energy into ending the genocide in Darfur as he does into spewing about SPs, agencies, and clients, he could probably put an end to it. I guess he has nothing better to do with his time.
 

korbel

Name Retired.
Aug 16, 2003
2,409
2
0
Her Hot Dreams
Force

Hello GG,

Personally, I see no reason why the ladies and/or agencies should be against having a faceless photo on the websites unless they feel any possible photo might work against their chance to profit. On the other hand, forcing them to do so is impractical. You are taking away the ladies choice, and you are forcing an extra expense on the agency as well as putting the agency in a position of forcing their ladies to possibly do something they choose not to.
Really GG this isn't the way.

No force,

Korbel
 
Last edited:

naughtylady

New Member
Nov 9, 2003
2,079
2
0
57
montreal
T-76>>> ROFLMAO!!!! I Love your sense of humor!

Ronnie,
Naughtylady
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
Special K said:
I don't think an agency should be forced to provide pictures of the girls, would it make things better for the client? Of course it would but it should be completely up to the discretion of the provider whether or not they want pictures out there. Would it be better for that providers business...most definitely but in rare cases such as with Marika of Xxxtase I don't think it makes a difference. There's no pics of her but from all the amazing things I've heard about her from very reliable sources I would be honored to meet her without having seen a picture.

SK,

I saw Marika and she is a jaw-dropping sexy knockout. The difference there is that I TRUST Martin of XXXtase. When Martin of XXXtase tells me a lady is hot, she is hot. Some others, including Martin of Asservissante have let me down when recommending ladies with no pics (I have yet to meet Kelly).

Should it be up to the provider? Yes and no. If they all had a choice, there would be no pics.:rolleyes: Why is it that every Eleganza lady has her pics on the site?:rolleyes: There are ways to take pics without revealing personal details on someone.

Then again, we can let t76 come on the boards and manifest all she wants against everything I propose. I had a great day, more fun, less t76 and Merb bullshit.:rolleyes:

Grand Gourou:D
 

Special K

‹^› ‹(•¿•)› ‹^›
May 3, 2003
5,079
4
38
Red Sox Nation
Visit site
General Gonad said:
Should it be up to the provider? Yes and no. If they all had a choice, there would be no pics.:rolleyes: Why is it that every Eleganza lady has her pics on the site?:rolleyes: There are ways to take pics without revealing personal details on someone.

The problem here is that there have been numerous girls on Eleganza's site who have had people recognize their photos and had to quit the business. One of my best experiences of 2007 comes to mind in a young lady I believe by the name of Jasmine (my memory sure isn't what it used to be) who then changed her name to something else before having to retire.

PS...13 posts in one day for me, I'm on a GG pace here!!
 

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
Special K said:
The problem here is that there have been numerous girls on Eleganza's site who have had people recognize their photos and had to quit the business. One of my best experiences of 2007 comes to mind in a young lady I believe by the name of Jasmine (my memory sure isn't what it used to be) who then changed her name to something else before having to retire.

Another one is Brittany but I doubt you are shedding a tear because she retired after her boyfriend recognized her.:D

GG

P.S. Imagine if there were no pics and each encounter needed some guy to TOFTT. I'd be one busy guy!:p
 
Last edited:

General Gonad

Enlightened pervert
Dec 31, 2005
3,463
6
0
mazingerz said:
C'est parce qu'une fille qui ne cache pas entièrement son visage peut être reconnue. J'ai déjà reconnue des filles moi par le bas de leur visage à cause d'un trait particulier à la forme de leur visage

Exactly, if they hid their faces entirely, there is almost zero chance that someone would recognize them.

GG
 

RogerRabbit

New Member
Aug 28, 2007
324
0
0
Established agencies

The high-class indies almost all have their own websites with some pictures. Why should not it be the same with agencies? Since some time, I only book with indies or established agencies who post pics of their ladies. I also book with some ladies without pictures but I know from many years. I don't expect to meet a new one without pics or VERY VERY good reviews and description.

Not posting pics always introduces some doubts. Do you like doubts?
 
Toronto Escorts