Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: GFS or the need for a new term

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    19

    Lightbulb GFS or the need for a new term

    Half awake this morning, I was thinking of the GFE term and all the discussion about wheter or not agencies should use it and so on and so on. I was also thinking about something Rebekka from Eleganza told me on my last visit: "We do provide GF services but..." (don't mind the rest it is irrelevant here). And so there was a light bulb.

    Why not take the current term GFE and make it GFS as in Girl Friend Services. It would be easy to define (we just need to use St-bart's definition) and people woudn't expect much other than this SP gives out such and such services. The experience part would differ a GFE from a GFS. Hey, an SP could be a GFE while not providing GFS (like she will only do CBJ, but the overall experience is like a GFE) thus making it more personnal.

    To deter those greedy agencies using GFE all around, another aconym could replace the term: GFX (as in eXperience)

    Whadday think?

  2. #2
    More intuitive acronyms like cgfe and bbgfe would be easier to adopt.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NY State
    Posts
    2,808
    Like a GFE, like a virgin. Sounds like a Madonna song.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NY State
    Posts
    2,808
    They use that term open minded liberally also. They are providing so they are open minded to begin with (so they say). They have the up on you with terminology. Their dictionary may not be the same as ours.

  5. #5
    Chipper,

    I don't understand the distinction. Could you explain what you mean by "The experience part would differ a GFE from a GFS".

    Bear

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    19
    The aconym could become OMS for open minded services. It would then signify that the SP in question does DATY, DFK and and only that.
    Last edited by Chipper; 07-26-2004 at 10:20 AM.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    19
    Bear,

    As I said before: Say a lady does DATY and DFK but only CBJ. She it not by St-Bart's definition a GFS. However, say she has that X factor that makes you have to hold the urge to call your mother and presenting your new girlfriend, she is a GFX or OMS. In other words, you clicked. June from RVRS is an example for me she does only LFK so she's not a GFS... but.... well you get the idea

    In other words if the SP goes above and beyond the call of duty to make you feel good, while not providing all 3 services necessary to be a GFS, she is a GFX while not being a GFS.

    See what I mean?

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    19

    Talking

    Originally posted by ElfGoneBad
    Now, I wonder what the opposite of that may be.
    The opposite would either be nunn (no sex) or wh..re (just that)

  9. #9
    Chipper,
    I think I understand and appreciate what you are trying to do, but it doesn't seem possible to me. To be honest, if an hour or two with an escort makes one want to call his mother, I think he should call a psychiatrist instead.

    It seems to me that the 'x' factor is quite subjective - isn't it more in the 'relationship' (or perhaps the client's (warped?) view of the 'relationship'), than in the woman. The 'x' factor for me could be different than the 'x' factor for you, wouldn't you think? Not something your average pimp would be capable of determining, or even comprehending (don't mean to insult all the pimps - just the average and below average - you know who you are).

    Maybe I still don't get it.

    As I see it, these would be the categories:

    GFX = The woman plays along with the fantasy in a way that you believe and enjoy, but doesn't provide all of the required services to be GFE

    GFS = The woman plays along with the fantasy,etc. ..., and provides all of the required services to be GFE

    OMS = The woman provides all the services, but really isn't into the fantasy??? (would you really feel the urge to call your mother?) .

    XXX? = The woman doesn't provide all the services, and really isn't into the fantasy.

    I think you may be expecting too much.

    Bear

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    2,116
    How about ABCD? For the SP who goes Above and Beyond the Call of Duty?

    Just a suggestion,

    Ronnie,
    Naughtylady
    They will forget what you said,
    they will forget what you did,
    but they will never forget the way you made them feel.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,481
    ... really cute one Ronnie !

  12. #12
    I am me, too!
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    If only I knew...
    Posts
    2,214

    Talking

    GFE, GFX, ABC, OMC... True, it's hard to define.

    For the GFE, is it at the beginning of the GF experience or just before you get ready to ditch her? We could say NGFE, for NewGFE or OGFE for OldGFE.

    GFE just around her time of the month or "normal"? We could say PMGFE for Pre-MenstruatiionGFE.

    Could becomes like PMOGFE?

    Some GF are more OM (open-minded) than others so, will we say OMPMOGFE?

    Where I am going is simple: why not use WORDS instead of abbreviations on this board. It's esaier that way isn't it?

    Of course, with the SP and agencies, abbrevriations do help to slow down LE but, these abbrev. have to be taken lightly because some peoples are more "liberals" in the interpretation. I guess YMMV...
    Last edited by metoo4; 07-26-2004 at 03:37 PM.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    19

    X Factor

    Bear,

    The X factor is exactly it: something very subjective. A GFX, is something different for each of us. That is also one of the reason of the new aconym. I just want to separate the eXperience part (very subjective) from the Service part (Objective but YMMV).

    It is common knowledge that the current definition of GFE leaves a lot to be desired. By separating the objective part from the subjective part, it should help us to keep them seperate.

    As for pimps, they could use the GFS term, but not the GFX term. Those using the latter term should be avoided as they are clearly trying to mislead the customer.

    I will keep using GFX although both OMS and ABCD are really good choices.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •