There's been some discussion lately of stolen pictures appearing on websites and advertisements. While not quite as blatantly dishonest, isn't it misleading for agencies to continue to feature pictures of girls who are no longer working for them?
Certainly a girl who has moved to another agency or gone indy should be pulled down immediately. One wonders why Jen, who has been working elsewhere for months, is still on the Devilish site. (Kudos, by the way, to Chloe and Mike for pulling Lindsay almost immediately after she moved on.)
But what about girls who are apparently no longer working? What should the statute of limitations be on pulling girls from websites? Kayla, whose availability hasn't been posted on merb since February 2, is still on the Woman of Passion website. A bit less clear cut is the case of June. June started in late March, worked two days, went on vacation for two weeks, worked 3-4 days after that and hasn't been posted as available since April 24. (My slight apologies to these two agencies. I'm sure there are numerous other similar cases in other places and other "guilty" parties; these are the two of which I'm aware.)