Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Do the mods delete threads on a SP's request???

  1. #1

    Do the mods delete threads on a SP's request???

    A couple of weeks ago, I noticed the thread on an independant SP who called herself <**name removed**> had disappeared from the incall section of the board. As I recall, this thread had 3 reviews in it: the first one by the initiator of the thread was quite positive, the second review by myself was mixed and the third one was more on the negative side. In any event, as far as I can remember, there was nothing contentious or offensive about this thread...no catfights, name-calling, personal info, or suchlike. A few days ago, I asked the initiator of the thread if he had deleted his own thread and he answered no. He also explained that the SP had asked the mods to delete her thread. Apparently, they have complied with her request.

    If this is actually what happened, I am asking the mods why they did this and what is their policy with respect to requests such as her's. More to the point, do SPs have veto rights about what is said of them on this board?

    JB
    Last edited by Mod 4; 11-06-2004 at 04:24 PM.

  2. #2
    Veteran of Misadventures
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    13,165

    Interesting.......

    JB,

    I do not recall the thread in question, but I will be very interested to see how the Mods respond to this inquiry. I accept your representation that you wrote an honest review and I would like to hear why the thread was deleted.

    EB

  3. #3

    this has nothing to do with moderators....

    Joeblow, do you happen to recall who posted this glowing review?? You must have glanced at the name of either the guy who posted the review or the guy who posted the negative review. Either name will help....

    Sounds to me like a shill.....positive post followed by two negatives. Then a deletion of the negative press to keep business from drying up. My guess is you find out the name of the original poster, you'll find a shill trying to draw up some extra business.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    140
    I've seen a few threads dissapear myself, never thought much about it though.

  5. #5
    Administrator Fred Zed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    UP ABOVE SMILING
    Posts
    1,492
    Quote Originally Posted by joeblow

    If this is actually what happened, I am asking the mods why they did this and what is their policy with respect to requests such as <<name removed>>. More to the point, do SPs have veto rights about what is said of them on this board?

    JB
    The answer is YES on these conditions:
    -Both GOOD and BAD Reviews are to be deleted
    - The SP is not a RIPOFF, Scam artist
    I would add that the same policy applies across all our sites.

    It does not matter whether the SP is an advertiser or not.

    Usually, providers who don't want reviews will have that clearly stated at their website. Hence, a reponsible hobbyist should respect the SP's request particularly if she has taken the trouble to post it at her site.
    Last edited by Mod 4; 11-06-2004 at 04:24 PM.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Travelling
    Posts
    671

    Owners of the business!

    All of us should remember that this board is a business and who is bringing in the moneys!
    Our only contrubution is keeping the board up to date with reviews and comments!
    Then you have your answer!
    Once you accept that, no problem with the owners protecting their business!
    Tha's life after all!

  7. #7
    Veteran of Misadventures
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    13,165

    No Review Policy

    So I am to understand that the SP in question had a no review policy which Joe Blow and some others failed to heed.

    Sounds like some very serious miscommunication issues between Joe Blow and the SP and the other guys who reviewed her.

  8. #8
    Administrator Fred Zed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    UP ABOVE SMILING
    Posts
    1,492
    Quote Originally Posted by Lawless
    Once you accept that, no problem with the owners protecting their business!
    Tha's life after all!
    If you check my comments above I said that the policy applies to advertisers and non advertisers alike. The SP being discussed here is not a MERB advertiser. Since it is unlikely that we would comply with a request from
    a rip- off SP to delete reviews MERB members are still protected.
    If a SP clearly states at her website ( or during the encounter ) that she would prefer not to be reviewed I think the client should respect that.

  9. #9
    >breadman

    I don`t think the thread starter is a shill. I think he is a bona fide hobbyist who simply had a good time.

    >EB

    Some additional bits of information you need to get the picture: my policy is to not identify myself a member of MERB when I see SPs and to not even broach the subject of review boards during a session. The times I have been asked by SPs about review boards, I pretend I am a lurker. The one time I was expressely asked by an SP not to do a review, I complied (too bad, she remains my ATF...Astrid of Toronto, now retired) Last, to repeat, my review of this SP was mixed: I found her attractive and friendly, my critique was on a particular aspect of her service, I have no bone to pick with her and wish her the best in life. For all these reasons, it is highly unlikely that she asked me not to review her and that I did anyhow.

    See for instance: https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthread...tyle#post20765

    >FredZed

    My session with this SP was in August. The first reviewer, to my recollection, started the thread just prior to my session. After my review, she started posting chit-chat in her own thread from August through September, thus bumping her name to the top of the incall section from time to time. I therefore gather she was not unhappy about her being reviewed on MERB...until the third reviewer came along, in October I think, and said he did not find her as attractive as I did. There was nothing derogatory in his post to my recollection, he simply disagreed with my taste. Some time after this third review, which was the actually the first to be clearly negative, I noticed the thread had disappeared.

    So Fred, I did not violate an SPs request not to be reviewed. I am raising this issue because I don`t like to waste my time contributing to the community only to have a review erased, I haven`t seen you or the mods state up till now that you give veto rights to SPs over what is said of them and I question your judgement in complying with this SPs request to delete her thread when it otherwise conformed to the stated posting guidelines of this board.

    JB
    Last edited by Mod 4; 11-06-2004 at 04:26 PM.

  10. #10
    Veteran of Misadventures
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    13,165

    Important Issue

    Fred,

    In light of this clarifying post by Joe Blow an important issue has been raised.

    I can understand an SP having a "no review" policy and MERB wanting to respect that by deleting reviews posted in violation of that policy.

    However, if as indicated by JB the SP voluntarily uses the Board and accepts favorable reviews, and only exercises her veto rights after a bad review has been posted, then we have a problem.

    MERB cannot allow veto rights to be exercised under these circumstances. There is no point in MERB continuing to exist if an SP is permitted to have a bunch of reviews deleted when someone posts a less than stellar review. If this is how MERB chooses to operate, it will come to be viewed as little more than a marketing tool for the SPs who pay it, as opposed to a forum for credible reviews.

  11. #11
    Selective hobbyist
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    228
    I'd like to suggest that the list of SPs asking for no-review should be published. SPs might have the right to confidentiality but publishing their names would certainly be a nice tool for us.

    A27

  12. #12
    Pornstar Wannabe survivor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    210

    Review board

    This is an escort review board. So there will be of course good and bad reviews. This is the purpose of a review board. We can't just post good reviews and let SP veto all the negative reviews, then what is the point to have a review board? I agree that if a SP clearly state or tell you not to write a review, then that is fine with me. But with what I have read in this thread, especially Joe's post, I have to agree with CaptRenault........ it seems that the SP in question used her veto only after a bad review has been written. If that is the case, it wasn't justify to delete the old reviews of that SP (good and bad)

    Please clarify the "no review" rules. Up to now, I didn't know that SP had the power of veto on this board.

  13. #13
    I think agentleman27's idea is best. If merb maintains a list of SPs who do not want reviews, their customers could avoid posting reviews (good or bad) on this board. I'm sure it is disconcerting to a hobbyist to find his review disappear from the archives at the SP's request. Such a list would help me since I happen to be a hobbyist with an "always-review" policy and I wouldn't knowingly call an escort who bars reviews. I have been surprised by a couple of escorts who barred me from future appointments after the fact because of my reviews, but those are sacrifices I had to make.

  14. #14
    Pornstar Wannabe survivor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    210

    Gentleman

    Gentleman,

    I think you posted in the wrong thread.

  15. #15
    Administrator Fred Zed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    UP ABOVE SMILING
    Posts
    1,492
    Quote Originally Posted by Simple
    I didn't see the thread in question but did catch the name of the SP. For what its worth, I did she her posting on another board (no, not that one) which also contained a review of her there. Whether she asks them to remove that one too, I don't know. Take care.
    That's possible. I know a few SPs who ask Canadian based boards to remove their posts and yet they will let the reviews stand on US based boards. That I find to be a contradiction. If a SP has a no review policy that should apply to all the boards.

    I think everyone is making some very constructive obsevations. To be honest, I find the N R P to be one of the harder policies to enforce on the boards. However, I also think this can be achieved without diminishing the value of the board to the hobbyist. I agree that a list of non reviewable Sps would be a good start.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •