Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Dear John of Eleganza

  1. #1

    Dear John of Eleganza

    John,

    I need to mention that the quality of your pictures has improved dramatically in the last few years. What internal changes did you make to accomplish this improvement?

    CS

  2. #2
    The lines of the ladies are much more artful now tending to accentuate their attributes & character. This is where the main difference seems to be. It seems you're paying much more attention to the setting & lighting. I now truly enjoy looking at the work. But, don't give up your night job just yet to become a fashion photographer.....LOL

  3. #3
    I have always said if John wanted to go straight he would make a very good photographer. I know what I paid for the kids graduation pictures and it was a lot more than the escorts I rented in Montreal! Of course you would probably want to be there when he is photographing your 18 y.o. daughter. He's too good of a recruiter....."What's that little Jessi? You say you want to earn some money so you can pay your way through college? Maybe I can help? Here, take my card...."

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    950
    Excellent work John. While the other agencys continue to swap the same old talent you continue to hire new and attractive young ladies and show us their assets with pictures that are the real deal.

  5. #5
    His pics have usually shown us the "real deal". He just does the pics with more talent now. If you look at most of the agency pics now, they either look half-assed or look "too professional", giving one the impression they're trying to hide something rather than show it. While John's pics never seem to hide much, he didn't seem to have any art in them until reletively recently.

  6. #6
    Veteran of Misadventures
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    13,165
    I have not noticed any changes one way or the other. In the past, the only problem I have ever had with John's photography was not enough ass shots. When he had Emmanuelle at his agency in 2007, she had one of the best asses I have ever seen, but the photos did not really show it. However, his photos have always been very representative overall.
    Last edited by EagerBeaver; 01-27-2011 at 08:35 PM.

  7. #7
    The photos to me seem kinda dated for some, and when I say dated, I really mean old.

  8. #8
    I like John's pictures for their simplicity and the WYSIWYG factor. He doesn't go crazy with outfits from sex shops, stockings, boots, high heel shoes, or showing girls in unnatural poses. In most of the pictures it's just a girl in her panties and it shows exactly what she will look like once she takes it off and jumps on your bed. There is certainly some value in that for many of us.

  9. #9
    Love the way the pics are shot on Eleganza's site, it shows the ladies as what they are and what they are not, in other words they tell a very accurate story of what they really look like, in person. Raw is a good word to use to describe John's pics. Very well done indeed, not misleading at all.

  10. #10
    Kansas Frank
    Guest
    Thanks for keeping it real, John. When I'm in a bad mood, I look at the lovely ladies on your website. I can only imagine how spectacular the ladies look in real life when they meet the Hobbyists. It's all good. I, for one, will likely be blown away by how beautiful these ladies are when I have to fortunate of meeting them in person.

    John -- can I ask for a small favor. Can you identify on the website which ladies are nonsmokers. So, when I have the opportunity, I can pre-book them before I arrive in Montreal.

  11. #11
    Retired veteran hobbyist
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Posts
    17,825
    Quote Originally Posted by EagerBeaver View Post
    I have not noticed any changes one way or the other. In the past, the only problem I have ever had with John's photography was not enough ass shots. When he had Emmanuelle at his agency in 2007, she had one of the best asses I have ever seen, but the photos did not really show it. However, his photos have always been very representative overall.
    I totally agree with you on all counts.

  12. #12
    Retired veteran hobbyist
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Posts
    17,825
    Quote Originally Posted by CS Martin View Post
    His pics have usually shown us the "real deal". If you look at most of the agency pics now, they either look half-assed or look "too professional", giving one the impression they're trying to hide something rather than show it.
    I totally agree.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    178
    John, is it possible to show a small YouTube like video of the girls? To see how their bodies move and what the backside view looks like. Always trust your judgement on facial appearance, but all of us rate & view bodies from different perspectives.

  14. #14
    Retired veteran hobbyist
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Posts
    17,825
    Quote Originally Posted by chadnyc View Post
    John, is it possible to show a small YouTube like video of the girls? To see how their bodies move and what the backside view looks like. Always trust your judgement on facial appearance, but all of us rate & view bodies from different perspectives.
    This is a great idea!!

    A former agency named "Sweet Dreams" once had small videoclips accompanying the pictures of their girls.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by lgna69xxx View Post
    Love the way the pics are shot on Eleganza's site, it shows the ladies as what they are and what they are not, in other words they tell a very accurate story of what they really look like, in person. Raw is a good word to use to describe John's pics. Very well done indeed, not misleading at all.
    Absolutely agree! I find that amongst all agencies, the Eleganza pics are my favorite! Boy would I like to live in that basement too!
    One small improvement that could be made JOhn-- this is not criticism, but just a tip-- is if you could get rid of the shadow behind most of the girls. This is easily accomplished by setting your flash a little differently (well explained on many internet sites). But even then, I prefer your shadow included pics to the usual "set up"/ photoshopped pics of other agencies.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •