From The Montreal Gazette:
http://www.montrealgazette.com/news...+workers+government+argues/4417029/story.html
I realize that a short article cannot do justice to all the documents filed and all the various points of view but there is one element that stands-out in the federal attorney's position.
Basically the federal govrnment's position is that the sex workers cannot have the protection of the law while continuing to work outside the law.
This raises two issues.
The potential for a consensus on the matter that bridges the various sentiments expressed by various interest groups throughout Canada.
The second issue is more basic. Are the sex workers willing to work strictly within the law and if so under what conditions?
http://www.montrealgazette.com/news...+workers+government+argues/4417029/story.html
I realize that a short article cannot do justice to all the documents filed and all the various points of view but there is one element that stands-out in the federal attorney's position.
Basically the federal govrnment's position is that the sex workers cannot have the protection of the law while continuing to work outside the law.
This raises two issues.
The potential for a consensus on the matter that bridges the various sentiments expressed by various interest groups throughout Canada.
The second issue is more basic. Are the sex workers willing to work strictly within the law and if so under what conditions?
Last edited: