Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 911 Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak out - On PBS ( US Television)

  1. #1

    911 Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak out - On PBS ( US Television)

    The video was produced by AE911 (Architects and Engineers for 911) .

    The first time PBS (Public Broadcasting Service) has shown this type of controversial info.

    So many technical facts that have never been revealed to the general public by the media.

    I suggest you at least look at the first 10 minutes and then decide if it is significant for you or not.

    http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138/

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NY State
    Posts
    2,808
    Very interesting film. So many questions left after 11 years.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,253
    It is very difficult to do a proper investigation due to the magnitude of what happened that fatal day and the time afterwords.

    It's very easy to look back and say they should have done this and that. But what was done was probably what they were able to do considering the circumstances during that time period of what had happended.

    To this day it is unbelievable to see the footage from that day because that was real life and not something from a movie.
    "Just When I Thought I Was Out.....They Pull Me Back In!!!"

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Montreal & Toronto
    Posts
    989
    Quote Originally Posted by jnutz View Post
    The mountain of evidence on 9/11 clearly shows that it was not Terrorism, but Bushism, that brought down the WTC.
    Nah ! it's clear that it's both in some ways of their own.

    I'm sure they knew it would happened.
    Scores of interviews proved it.

    Probably wanted to use it as an excuse but didn't think it would be that big !

    Facefuck images of him sitting there are clear... you can see in his mind saying to himself "Oh Shit !"

  5. #5
    The 2 main issues I have is

    1) Building 7 coming straight down like a demolition late afternoon on September 11. How come the media barely covered this?

    2) We assume the twin towers came down from the weight of the top crushing the bottom. But this is impossible. The top would have tipped to one side eventually. It is impossible for every one of the 47 support columns to break at the same time and at every level going down all the way to the bottom. Also, keep in mind that the top portion should get crushed as it is crushing the bottom floors going down. So after 10-15 floors down, the top portion is completely gone... Nothing left to demolish the rest of the lower floors. So what outside force crushed-demolished the 50 or so bottom floors ????

    The video is available on YouTube also.

  6. #6
    I am me, too!
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    If only I knew...
    Posts
    2,214
    I watched about half the video and I stopped because i could not believe peoples could actually think the movie was in any way of form scientifically based. Did anybody watch the programs on tv where they show the demolition of buildings? It takes weeks to prepare a controlled demolition and we are not talking about only the planning because the explosives have to be installed and that takes lots of time.
    If the buildings were demolished by bombs, why would the peoples planting the explosives bother to make a perfect controlled demolition where all would go down in a straight line? That does not make any sense because it was useless to do so and it was easier to simply blow it up any way they could. This is not like they were trying to minimize the damages after all.
    For the twin towers the conspiracy theory also implicate the bombers would have to climb to the exact location the planes hit to plant the bombs, with the people going down and with the damages. This was impossible.
    One guy say it was impossible for the temperature to reach a high enough level to melt steel. Again that is bullshit because even a house fire is subject to the convection effect that make the air rise and get hotter and hotter the higher it goes. That is the principle behind flash-over where entire room with no apparent high temperature combustible inside just turn into a super hot ball of flames. Wood burns at a way lower temperature than fuel and a house will flash-over with temperatures of way over 1000F.
    Peoples heard explosions. What is the sound of an explosion made of? It is fast air displacement. What does floors collapsing creates? Air displacement. Puff of smokes? Air displacement. Take a piece of steel and pull on both ends until is breaks. That will sound like an explosion. The floors collapsing broke many steel beams, that is more explosion sounds. Sound is also slower than light so depending on the distance, the explosions had nothing to do with the results seen. The dust and debris will also appear way later than the sound and light, one more detail that was ignored.

  7. #7
    I am me, too!
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    If only I knew...
    Posts
    2,214
    Jnutz any plane hitting a block of concrete at 200+mph will disappear because any plane is very fragile no matter how big it is. The only solid pieces are the landing gears the main wing spars and reactors parts. All the rest is not that strong. Add the fuel to the speed and some of the metal components will vaporize in the fire. There have been documented high speed big planes crash on open ground where barely anything resembling a plane was ever found. Put that in a building big enough to contain the heat and allow the temperature to raise, mix that to the building debris and not much recognizable remains.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •