Here in the US I notice many SP's, black and white, stipulating under their advertisements "no black men please" or a variant of that I even seen "no black men under the age of 30." For me this is not a big deal b/c I am not black however I could see why some men of color might get frustrated with this policy of uniforming rejecting a person on race.
Recently spoke to a SP about this and she responded "I don't believe in race mixing." I subsequently asked her who she voted for and she responded Barack Obama which I found ironic and hypocritical - she won't bang him b/c of skin color but it's alright to vote for him. She finally remarked that it's a personal preference not to see black men but I could not help but think isn't choosing not to be racist a personal preference?
I'm trying understand why so many SP's say they do not see black men, is it:
1. b/c black men have bigger members
2. b/c black men are more aggressive/belligerent
3. b/c the SP's are simply racist
Can anyone shed any insight on this?
Recently spoke to a SP about this and she responded "I don't believe in race mixing." I subsequently asked her who she voted for and she responded Barack Obama which I found ironic and hypocritical - she won't bang him b/c of skin color but it's alright to vote for him. She finally remarked that it's a personal preference not to see black men but I could not help but think isn't choosing not to be racist a personal preference?
I'm trying understand why so many SP's say they do not see black men, is it:
1. b/c black men have bigger members
2. b/c black men are more aggressive/belligerent
3. b/c the SP's are simply racist
Can anyone shed any insight on this?
