Menu
Forums
Advertise
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ForeverEscorts
Montreal Escorts
Fling
Sex Dolls
AI Porn
Menu
Modnar's latest activity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Ask us anything part 3
.
That does make sense. I'm quite paranoid about STI's, so I even keep track of when I first notice things like spots or rashes and when I...
Today at 12:00 AM
M
Modnar
reacted to
ChloeCoeur's post
in the thread
Ask us anything part 3
with
Like
.
I keep records that include contact info, dates, session type, how it went, etc... useful for a number of reasons
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Ask us anything part 3
.
What’s stopping you?
Yesterday at 8:52 PM
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Ask us anything part 3
.
A few questions for SP's on reviews and client management (I apologize if this has been asked before; I tried searching but couldn't...
Yesterday at 8:05 PM
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Ask us anything part 3
.
Someone else already asked this but I think there wasn't an answer: what about photos/videos that avoid the face?
Yesterday at 7:57 PM
M
Modnar
reacted to
Lunaseraphim's post
in the thread
Do you ever see SPs advertised on Leolist?
with
Like
.
Leolist is so controversial and I avoid bumping my ad on it for that reason. But there are perks to using it from a SP's perspective. If...
Yesterday at 7:28 PM
M
Modnar
reacted to
Zzyzx's post
in the thread
Do you ever see SPs advertised on Leolist?
with
Like
.
Only if the SP has reviews here
Yesterday at 7:26 PM
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Why isn’t “BJ only” a standard service?
.
I'm mostly interested in the cultural/business question of why it is not a widely offered standard service with its own rate, not...
Yesterday at 5:52 PM
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Why isn’t “BJ only” a standard service?
.
You are right, I overlooked this point, but that is a separate discussion.
Yesterday at 5:40 PM
M
Modnar
reacted to
urquell's post
in the thread
Why isn’t “BJ only” a standard service?
with
Like
.
OK, let's try it from a few different viewpoints, any or all of which may be valid depending on the provider: 1) Demand. I mentioned...
Yesterday at 5:39 PM
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Why isn’t “BJ only” a standard service?
.
Maybe, but until then, I'll stick with the common-sense notion that a BJ is a less involved action than FS in every possible sense.
Yesterday at 5:34 PM
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Why isn’t “BJ only” a standard service?
.
Looks like this thread went in a different direction than I originally intended, maybe because of my lack of precision. Honestly, this...
Yesterday at 5:19 PM
M
Modnar
reacted to
Fradi's post
in the thread
The customer service improvement thread
with
Like
.
I don’t really care about perfumes as long as it is a nice scent and they don’t reek from it, Oils never came across it ( I don’t...
Yesterday at 2:35 PM
M
Modnar
reacted to
urquell's post
in the thread
Why isn’t “BJ only” a standard service?
with
Like
.
I would argue that cockworship is a completely separate service, and would be classified separately..maybe like Tantra or some fetish...
Yesterday at 2:08 PM
M
Modnar
replied to the thread
Why isn’t “BJ only” a standard service?
.
I wouldn't say DFK and 69 means you're falling into FS. I think there's a big jump from services like DFK, BJ, DATY, and 69 to PIV. Am I...
Thursday at 10:52 PM
Top
Bottom