Montreal Escorts

Hockey Canada sex assault scandal

gaby

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2011
11,391
7,971
113
Yep....it involves 8 players...some playing now in the NHL....some are certainement dans une situation inconfortable....lol...
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
21,037
3,816
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
It sounds like the raped woman was simply paid off and sent on her way. Police were not consulted because apparently it was believed a hush money payment was a better idea:
That your national team is staffed with rapists was a story they didn't want you to hear, but now you will hear it.
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
Police were not consulted because apparently it was believed a hush money payment was a better idea:

It's not true that "police were not consulted."

The trial of 5 players from this case starts Tuesday in London, Ontario and as this article states, "London police investigated and closed the case in early 2019. Criminal charges were laid in January 2024 following a revived London police investigation."

The reason that the case was revived is that a civil case against Hockey Canada revealed that it had a secret fund to pay women who filed complaints against national team members. The civil case was settled with a payment to the accuser.

We'll see what evidence is presented at the trial. But I am skeptical of criminal cases (other than murder) that take 7 years to get to trial. As the saying goes, "Justice delayed is justice denied."


The much-anticipated sexual assault trial of five players from the 2018 Canadian world junior hockey team is expected to begin Tuesday morning.

Jury selection is slated to start at 10 a.m. at the London courthouse for a Superior Court of Justice trial that’s slated to last eight weeks.

The charges are linked to a Hockey Canada gala in London in June 2018 to celebrate the team’s gold medal performance months earlier. London police investigated and closed the case in early 2019. Criminal charges were laid in January 2024 following a revived London police investigation.

The complainant, whose identity is protected by court order, has alleged she was sexually assaulted in a room at the Delta Armouries downtown after meeting several men at a Richmond Row bar and then accompanying one of the men for consensual sex at the hotel.

All five men went on to National Hockey League careers. The four who were on NHL rosters at the time they were charged did not have their contracts renewed.

All five men are expected to plead not guilty.

The case has drawn international attention and it’s expected there will be a crush of media covering the proceedings.

THE PLAYERS AND THE CHARGES​

  • Michael McLeod, 27, is a forward from Mississauga who played five years with the NHL’s New Jersey Devils. He’s charged with sexual assault and sexual assault by being a party to the offence. He was the 12th overall draft pick by the Devils in 2016. His contract was not renewed after the 2024 season and he spent last year playing for Barys Astana of the Kontinental Hockey League in Russia.
  • Alex Formenton, 25, a former star with the London Knights, is charged with sexual assault. He was playing in Switzerland before taking a leave in 2024 to face the charges. The Barrie native last played in the NHL for the Ottawa Senators in the 2021-22 season, but did not sign a new contract at season’s end.
  • Cal Foote, 26, son of hall-of-famer Adam Foote, played for NHL teams in Tampa Bay, Nashville and New Jersey. He is charged with sexual assault. He most recently played for a top-tier team in Slovakia.
  • Dillon Dube, 26, a Golden, B.C. native who played six seasons for the NHL’s Calgary Flames, spent last season playing for Dinamo Minsk in the Kontinental Hockey League. He’s charged with sexual assault.
  • Carter Hart, 26, was a star goaltender with the NHL’s Philadelphia Flyers before he was charged with sexual assault. The Sherwood Park, Alberta native did not play this year.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
21,037
3,816
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
Captain,

I don't know how big of a hockey fan you are but Carter Hart has been on an "indefinite leave of absence" from the Philadelphia Flyers since early 2024. Shortly after his involvement broke. I think he was one of the more talented players of the accuseds. This doesn't mean he is guilty of anything, but in the sports world generally these kinds of allegations are career interrupting if not ending.

The Wander Franco trial is starting soon as well (MLB player accused of sex with underaged girl in the Dominican Republican). Franco is on administrative leave from MLB and has a $182 million contract on the line to lose if convicted. To have $182 million riding on a trial- money he has not yet made- is as high stakes as it gets:

BTW my point in the above post was that the police were not consulted at the time of the hush payment and whatever evidence was given over for it, which I am not assuming was the same evidence they reviewed in 2019. More likely not, otherwise charges wouldn't have been laid. So I did not made the same assumption you made that the police saw or heard all of the evidence in 2019. Witnesses may have come forward or other evidence located.
 
Last edited:

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
A 2024 story in ESPN about the timeline of events in the case leads me to believe that there is a political aspect to the case:


Here's a summary of key events:

  1. January 2018: Canada beats Sweden to win gold.
  2. June 2018: Team has a reunion in London, Ontario to be honored and to celebrate. After dinner, several players go to a bar and one of the players meets a woman (an adult, not younger than 18) and she voluntarily goes back to player's and "engaged in sex acts" (no suggestion of non consent).
  3. According to the woman, the player invited several other players into the room without [or maybe with] her consent and they engaged in oral sex and penetration with her. According to the woman, she was coerced [or maybe not] into making two videos in which she stated that "everything that happened was consensual."
  4. The next day, "the victim's then-stepfather called Hockey Canada's human resources department to report the alleged sexual assault that occurred." [Because when a woman is raped, she is supposed to contact the organization where the accused works, not the police? HUH?]
  5. A few days later, former Hockey Canada CEO Tom Renney learned about the allegations and someone from Hockey Canada contacted the London police. Hockey Canada started its own investigation
  6. February 2019: "London police informed Hockey Canada that its criminal investigation was closed. Hockey Canada claimed the woman in question declined to speak with authorities or their investigators. No charges had been filed at this stage."
  7. September 2020: "Hockey Canada closed its own third-party investigation into the matter."
  8. April 2022: "The [alleged] victim filed her statement of claim with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, seeking $3.55 million in damages from Hockey Canada..."
  9. May 2022: It's basically a "she said, they said case.” So-"Hockey Canada settled its case on behalf of the defendants, reaching an out-of-court settlement with the woman for an undisclosed amount..." One would think that at this point, that would be the end of the story. It's not a nice one and the players involved deserved some kind of discipline for their behavior but in a case like this, it's probably the best outcome that both sides could hope for.
  10. Later that month, the shits hits the fan- "TSN reporter Rick Westhead broke the news of the woman's allegations and lawsuit against the contingent of players, and that she had accepted a settlement in the matter."
  11. June 2022: The case becomes a political football and the usual outrage from ministers, parliament and the media breaks out. Some sponsors quit. "On July 18, the Canadian Press reported Hockey Canada had been maintaining a fund of minor hockey membership fees that it used to pay for uninsured liabilities. That included sexual assault claims."
  12. "While Hockey Canada was explaining itself, the London police announced an internal review of its own investigation from 2018." This part seems blatantly political. The police took note of the political uproar and suddenly announced a new investigation lest they become the target of wrath from politicians and the media.
  13. January 2024: "The Globe and Mail reported five players from the 2018 team were asked to surrender themselves to London police."
  14. February 2024: At a news conference-"The London Police Service cited a discovery of new evidence for reopening an investigation into an alleged sexual assault involving five players from Canada's 2018 World Junior hockey team.
  15. April 2025: trial begins.
I'm skeptical about the "discovery of new evidence." As I said, this is a "she said, they said case"-the possibility of significant new evidence suddenly being revealed is very small. Maybe the woman got a friend to tell the police that she just remembered that the woman had told her what happened. Who knows? But the timeline of events makes me believe that the case should have ended with the civil settlement. Instead, we have Canada's version of a sexual assault melodrama similar to the Duke Lacrosse case or the Harvey Weinstein case. I hope the players are found not guilty.
 
Last edited:

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
The trial proceedings are underway today with jury selection. All five accused players entered pleas of not guilty. Many potential witnesses were named, including the complainant and some of her friends and other members of the Canadian Junior team of 2018. Here is a link to a current podcast episode about the trial:


According to what a reporter said during the podcast, there is a "publication ban" in effect during the trial. "A publication ban is an order the Court makes that prevents anyone from publishing, broadcasting, or sending any information that could identify a victim." (https://www.justice.gc.ca/)
 
Last edited:

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
A jury of 12 plus 2 alternates has been selected for the trial. There are 11 women and 3 men among the 14 selected. It's a little surprising that it took only one day, but I guess the process moves more quickly in Canada than in the U.S.

Each defendant has his own legal team. The 5 are being tried together but the jury will issue individual verdicts for each defendant.

The complainant, "E.M." will take the witness stand and be cross-examined by the defendants' lawyers. Her testimony and how she holds up under cross-examination is probably the most important part of the trial. I haven't seen anything about whether the defendants will take the stand. In a case like this, usually they would not do so, but we'll see.

 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
This TSN article answers some questions about the case and the Canadian legal system, for example:

"...Lawyers in Canada do not have peremptory challenges [during jury selection] like you might see in a U.S. court."
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
21,037
3,816
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
This TSN article answers some questions about the case and the Canadian legal system, for example:

"...Lawyers in Canada do not have peremptory challenges [during jury selection] like you might see in a U.S. court."
We only get 3 in Connecticut, but you gotta be very careful using them. There can be a temptation to use them early and often depending on your jury pool (I would try to keep liberal women off the jury in that case at all costs), but you have to try and resist it because you can get some real bad jurors late, after you have run out of peremptory challenges. It's like eating at a dim sum restaurant, as well, in that you can't say yes to every single thing that comes out of the kitchen because you will be stuffed when they role out the real goodies.

Any juror I don't like I will try to persuade opposing counsel should be challenged for cause. If he or she doesn't agree, and I think I have a leg to stand on, I will go and take it up with the Judge. You have to pick your spots with this strategy, but I did win some challenges for cause that opposing counsel didn't agree with me on.
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
We only get 3 in Connecticut...
That's interesting, Eager, but as I pointed out: "...Lawyers in Canada do not have peremptory challenges..." So jury selection proceeds more quickly in Canada than it does in the U.S. Also, jury trials are less common in Canada than in the United States. In general, Canada does not have jury trials for civil cases while the U.S. often does; and Canada has jury trials mainly for the most serious criminal offenses-those with potential jail sentences of five or more years.
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
One of the key questions in the trial is whether the complainant consented to the sexual encounters of that evening. According to her, she consented to the sex with the first player but not the others. However, because the players were conscious that there might be a problem with proving that they had the woman's consent to engage in sex with the group, they recorded two short videos asking her to acknowledge that she had consented to sex with all of them.


It’s nearly 3:30 a.m. on June 19, 2018, and inside a room at the Delta Armouries Hotel in London, Ontario, a six-second cellphone video is being recorded.

“You’re OK with this?” an unidentified man asks a young woman, who is shown from the neck up. “I’m OK with this,” she responds before the video cuts off.

Almost an hour later, another cellphone video is recorded. This one is about 12 seconds long. The same woman stands with a towel covering her chest.

She asks, “Are you recording me?” before declaring, “It was all consensual. You are so paranoid, holy. I enjoyed it, it was fine. It was all consensual. I am so sober, that’s why I can’t do this right now.”

This week, almost seven years since those two brief videos were recorded — and first reported on by The Globe and Mail and TSN — those 18 seconds of footage will be at the center of a case that has grabbed the attention of the hockey world as five former members of Canada’s 2018 gold medal-winning World Junior Championship team — Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, Dillon Dubé, Michael McLeod and Cal Foote — each face one count of sexual assault, and McLeod a second charge for “being party to the offense.”

In a lawsuit filed by the woman — referred to as E.M. in court documents — she said that eight players assaulted her over several hours in the London hotel room. She confirmed she engaged in consensual sex with one player, but he invited several of his teammates into the hotel room without her knowledge or consent. E.M. maintains she did not consent to any of the sexual contact or acts that followed...

...The defendants, now aged 25 to 27, came of age during a turbulent period of prominent revelations of sexual violence by formerly esteemed figures. For many athletes from that era, a perception emerged that they were targets due to their fame and/or wealth and that steps and strategies had to be adopted to head off false allegations. In response, athletes sought digital indemnifiers. From “sex contracts” to strategic sexting to so-called “consent videos,” more and more athletes are creating digital footprints of their sexual encounters.

...The aftershocks of that scandal [the Kobe Bryant rape case] on the lives of athletes were significant. Some turned to “pre-sex agreement forms” as insurance against any allegations. In an interview with Sports Illustrated in 2003, Ava Cadell, an L.A. area sex therapist, said in the wake of the Bryant case she had begun drawing up such agreements. “Athletes are going to carry consent forms just like they carry condoms,” she said. “It’s another layer of protection.”

Stephen Jackson, who played 14 seasons in the NBA, explained to SI why he would rely on a consent form before sex: “People look at us as targets and try to get what they can out of us.”

The concern amongst professional athletes spread to college campuses when, in 2006, an exotic dancer hired to perform at a team party accused three members of the Duke University men’s lacrosse team of raping her. The details were splashed across front pages; “60 Minutes” devoted five separate segments to coverage of the case. Yet, it would later be revealed that the assault accusation against the trio was a fabrication. A “Tragic Rush to Accuse” read a headline in the Canadian National Post.

In 2009, Apple unveiled its iPhone 3GS, the first model with both photo and video recording capabilities. Visual evidence of sexual encounters became more ubiquitous, in the form of both agreed-upon sex tapes and secret voyeuristic recordings. In 2013, Roxanne Jones, former vice president of ESPN, penned an op-ed for CNN titled “Young men, get a ‘yes’ text before sex.’”...
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
The prosecution ("the Crown") made its opening statement in the trial Wednesday morning. After the lunch break, the judge adjourned the trial for the day to discuss a procedural matter with the attorneys.

 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
21,037
3,816
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
The prosecution ("the Crown") made its opening statement in the trial Wednesday morning. After the lunch break, the judge adjourned the trial for the day to discuss a procedural matter with the attorneys.

Probably a motion in limine to keep certain evidence or testimony away from the jury.
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
The legal discussions between the judge and the lawyers continued today without the jury present. The press is not allowed to report on what issues are being discussed or what was said. The trial is supposed to resume Friday but we'll see.

Nobody wins in a case like this but I think it will be difficult for the prosecution to get a conviction. The prosecution's case rests on the argument that even though the woman allowed the recording of two short videos stating that she gave consent in general to the sexual encounters, she did not give consent to each and every act that occurred between her and each player.

Such an argument inevitably brings to mind humorous videos such as:

 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
Though the trial had barely begun, the judge has already declared a mistrial. A new trial with a new jury will start right away. I'm not surprised at the news because the trial was paused for 1.5 days right at the start to discuss procedural matters that arose during the lunch break of the first day of trial proceedings--that's a long pause that indicates what was being discussed was probably pretty serious.


London, Ont. – Justice Maria Carroccia has declared a mistrial in the trial of five former members of Canada’s 2018 world junior hockey team.

A mistrial is a trial that is not successfully completed due to a significant error or problem that prevents a fair verdict from being reached.

Justice Carroccia ruled that media may report on her ruling but may not publish more details about the decision. A media consortium is challenging that publication ban.

A new trial is scheduled to begin later today with a new jury of 14 members.

Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, and Carter Hart and charged with sexually assaulting a woman identified in court documents as E.M. in June 2018 at a London hotel following a Hockey Canada golf and gala event. McLeod faces a second sexual assault charge as a party to the offence.

The defendants have pled not guilty.

More to come.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
21,037
3,816
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
The ESPN report indicates the prosecution called its first witness and (apparently) the mistrial was caused by something that person was asked by the prosecutor, or something that person had testified to which was thought to "poison" the jury. It does happen. One of my adversaries once had a mistrial declared for mentioning insurance in a civil case, which you cannot do, ever.
 
Last edited:

Doc Holliday

The Horny Cowboy
Sep 27, 2003
20,408
1,942
113
Canada
This trial will be extremely difficult to prosecute & get a guilty verdict. I’ve been fascinated with this case for the past two years & read & watched everything about it. What’s ironic about the case i’m somewhat obsessed with is that when i first read & heard about it i realized that i had stayed at the same hotel the incident happened. The London Delta Armories Hotel. I recalled staying there in 2018 (i also stayed at other London area hotels such as the BW Lamplighter Inn) when i first started visiting London so i started going through my tax documents from that year & realized that i was staying at that same hotel that particular week! Anyways the re-trial will be extremely difficult on the alleged victim & also on the accused. It’s expected to last a couple of months. Whatever the outcome turns out to be many lives have been ruined because of this case.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
21,037
3,816
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
This trial will be extremely difficult to prosecute & get a guilty verdict.
My experience is that prosecutors like really difficult high profile trials, because huge political rewards come with a win. Who can forget what the Mafia Commission trials did for Rudolph Giuliani's career as a young prosecutor. The Mafia later put on a contract on his life but Giuliani, who lusted for political power, was not deterred.

Other prosecutors leverage big trial wins into huge 6 figure job offers from white collar criminal defense firms. They know that once they get noticed there will be a payday from the other side at 5-10 times the amount they are making as a prosecutor. It happens all the time everywhere in the legal profession.
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,250
1,163
113
Casablanca
...the mistrial was caused by something that person was asked by the prosecutor, or something that person had testified to which was thought to "poison" the jury. It does happen.
That's possible but you're speculating. The media is not allowed to report the reason for the mistrial. The only thing that has been reported is that: "...Wednesday afternoon, Carroccia told jurors that something had happened over the lunch hour that she needed to think about and discuss with the lawyers." That implies that something happened outside of the court proceedings, not during the trial.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts