Search results

Yeaaaah....no. It's not that simple. It's not about choosing to do or not do it. That decision is always available, and of course people on either side of the equation can agree or disagree as they like and look elsewhere if they so choose. That's not really the point. The overarching theme of...

It can and does happen. Not usually to cause a scene, but sometimes a photo or a video snippet. Just writing to the boss is enough though for a lot of places. As you say, even if there's no photo and you can explain it away as a malicious prank or whatever it's still pretty fucking awkward...

The short answer is yes, but the real answer requires nuance. People have been lumping everything together into an overriding theme of risk of personal assault, but we've really been talking about 3 things: 1) security of your person 2) security of your money 3) security of your identity and...

anytime. There's lots of discussion of different places in the international section and if any area in particular is of interest to you then I'd be happy to go deeper into it with you. I don't use LL so can't help you there but there's no shortage of experience on MERB lol

I'll refer you to post #29. I already covered all that. The hyperbole also wasn't necessary because I've clearly delineated over multiple posts that different situations require different things, or nothing at all, and pretending that all of these things is necessary all the time is a gross...

Political discussion these days doesn't revolve around a thoughtful examination of party platforms or in the benefits of particular party issues, their implementation or the long term benefits/consequences of such, to the extent that they ever did in times past. In current times political...

actually, I wasn't as much thinking about women beating their clients (although that happens too) as about the women's pimps/accomplices doing it. I'm also not just talking about it from a local perspective, but from a global perspective. In a great many places men who beat women get a trip to...

OK. but intention is the key here. There is space for both parties to misrepresent, even for benign purposes that are also simultaneously security precautions. Let's pick something simple. A client has a burner phone that he uses to hobby because his SO regularly goes through his normal phone...

It wasn't rhetorical. You also don't need to re-interpret my question. Regardless of the fact that the reasons for the anonymity might be different both clients and SPs have a need for anonymity, and anonymity is today's society takes many of the same forms for everyone. I'm not sure why you'd...

I'm not sure why your tone is so angry here, since I'm having a civil discussion here, but let's unpack this: 1) I never said that there weren't dangers to SPs. In fact I understand completely why SPs operate anonymously and as you said I clearly understand the dangers. I encourage the SPs to...