Search results

I'm going to push back on this, because from the guy standpoint it's not true, or at least it may only locally be true. Guys adapt, and make allowances for the changes here, but they don't like them and they don't like the uncertainty of having to ask what everything is all the time, and while...

I think you missed what I was saying. If GFE is motor oil then yes, I'm fine getting motor oil. If GFE is coffee then I'm fine getting coffee. If GFE is coffee then I'm not fine getting motor oil. So, let's assume that GFE = Coffee. Is there good coffee and bad coffee? Sure. But GFE always...

No. To use your analogy, GFE meant peruvian chocolate 70% cocoa. That's it. No swiss chocolate, no Belgian chocolate, no 85 %, no 60%, no sprinkles. Nada. That's the product. As soon as you alter any of that it's not GFE anymore. There is no selective interpretation, no salespeak, and nobody...

You see, this outlook is a large part of the problem, and why I hate this term so much now. "GFE should include" is why there is so much confusion. Everybody has a different definition of what GFE means. Before GFE meant GFE, and everybody knew what that meant. Super simple. Now it means...

No way baby! You're not getting behind me!!! That sounded better in my head than it does in print :oops:

It may not be now, and I think that's what the OP was complaining about, but yes, GFE meant a very short, very specific coupling of acronyms that was pretty much agreed upon all around the world, generally speaking. The fact that it doesn't mean anything specific now has made the term useless...

GFE was always really simple. It meant a willingness to french kiss and do BBBJ. That's it. End of story. PSE has always been harder to pin down as anything in particular, because it could incorporate many things, but generally speaking it simply meant that the SP was open to anal. There...

Yes, you're right, the acronyms are meaningless now, because what was generally understand to be the case in terms of an offering before is now basically just marketing terms to attract clients without any real meaning behind them. As you say, you now still have to confirm every little thing...

I don't know if you're there, but I'm definitely here.

Send him a Thai ladyboy. SURPRISE! :)

With the rate of inflation that means that Julia's going to have to offer 145 minutes of extra time in 10 years. Might be worth waiting for. hmmmmm........ :)

Pffffttt.. Dilettante. I don't have to brag about my snacks. They speak for themselves. If you have to talk them up then it just means you're insecure about whether your snacks are top shelf or not. I will say this though. Some people talk about the hundreds or even thousands of people who like...

Sacrilege! My snacks are the finest. All the descriminating SPs say so. I mean, I don't want to sound stuffy about it Michelle, but how do you not know that? if you're nice to me perhaps I will let you sample one of my snacks. A little one. :) Post 6! lol

It's a naive idea on this forum, I think, much like the "awards" threads are.You're not going to get honest and non-biased reviews, and you're not going to incorporate everyone. I'm not sure how many agencies aren't on MERB but I doubt people who pay to be here are going to want the services of...

Yep. Powell and Loy were to banter what Fred and Ginger were for dancing. Some iterations were better than others, but no matter what the material was the onscreen chemistry elevates the viewing experience.

There was an earlier Casino Royale with Lorre, but it has virtually nothing to recommend to it, and I don't think it can really be considered a Bond movie in the conventional sense. I watched it only because I love Peter Lorre, years ago, but it's not very good. You can catch the entirety of it...

C'mon Julia, you're all mine bay-beeeee.... :D

I'm inclined to agree with this too, and to have someone in their early-mid thirties pick up the batoin and run with it. I'm not sure that wer can be wedded to the canon 5 picture thing though, given the movie industry's current challenges and funding issues extending the space between films...

I disagree with you. As I previously mentioned I love McGoohan, and had he wanted the role he could have had it, but he wasn't the right guy for the vision. Even he recognized that he wasn't the right guy. Saying that he could have played something were it not for an integral character...

Cary Grant would be a dream Bond in almost every aspect, but he lost some of physical prowess relatively early in middle age, and you can see that in films like North by Northwest. If they had caught him early enough I don't think any of us would be questioning who was the best Bond, I think...