Search results

Nonsense? Watch a trump rally if you want to see true nonsense. Then there's being impeached twice, indicated four times, convicted of fraud, found civilly liable for sexual assault, botched response to covid, trying to overturn the results of a free and fair election, and continuing to lie...

You can't just "believe" the election was stolen. There has to be credible evidence. It has to be proven. Just saying it, and repeating it, is not evidence or proof. Trump tried unsuccessfully to overturn the results of a free and fair election without evidence and without proof and has been...

There is no logical correlation between the success of and the opportunity in the U.S. and the electoral college system in electing a POTUS. No one is being a sheep for pointing out that it is an undemocratic way to elect a president that unfairly advantages one particular political movement...

Trump tried and failed to overturn the 2020 election. If in 2024 he tries and succeeds in stealing the election, no American, including representative Raskin, should accept the results.

That's a false equivalency. Democrats are not claiming the election is rigged before it is even held. Democrats have not claimed the election was stolen from them with zero evidence to support that claim. Democrats have not put forward false slates of electors in states they lost, Democrats have...

To the best of my knowledge, no other country on the planet elects it's president/prime minister like the US. In fact in the US, no other election is decided by a slate of electors. The answer to not to push more decisions to the states (and I don't even know how that's applicable here), but...

Well that is one unusual comparison. The fact remains that the EC, born out of a concession to slave states, is an undemocratic way to elect a president [presidential elections should not be decided by voters in 7 swing states - all votes should count equally], and the EC gives outsized...

Because it gave 'slave states' outsized power to select the president. These 'slaves states' were also allowed to count their slaves as 3/5 of a person in determining the number of members of the House of Representatives and consequently the number of electoral college votes for that state. If...

It's arcane. It's archaic. It's racist. It's fucked up. It was set up this way by the Founders as a concession to slave states (along with counting slaves as 3/5 of a human) to give low population slave states more political power.

1. With the agencies a 1 hr appointment is up to 50 minutes of service. She will spend the final 10 minutes or so cleaning up. 2. I've only had BBBJ so I can't answer this question. 3. You can bring your own condom, but she will have condoms too. Good luck. Relax and enjoy the service.

Then by that thinking the American people don't want trump who has never accepted responsible or accountability for any of his mistakes [remember COVID, impeachment 1, impeachment 2] and has articulated no plan for the future beyond retribution and revenge.

The question of who will win the election is hardly secondary. This election represents the most critical decision the voters will make in the 248 years of the country. When Trump loses there will be chaos and violence. Trump will claim, without evidence, that the election was stolen from him...

One of the many reasons why trump is unfit to be president. In his narcissistic, zero-sum brain he thinks he must punish his opponents and reward only his supporters and those who flatter him. He is a deeply flawed human with an all-consuming ego who is incapable and uninterested in serving the...

So only a partisan would object to it being unsealed, right? It cites the legal authority in support of the unsealed indictment.

The indictments against trump have been unsealed. How is the judge unsealing a brief in support of the unsealed indictment any different? Even the defendant said on the campaign trail that there's nothing new in the brief. Of course he also went on to call it "election interference", so he's...

Once again you're assuming facts not in evidence. It's only your opinion, based on your personal partisan politics, that the judge was motivated by partisan politics. It's her court, her trial, and her decision to unseal the brief. She has made it abundantly clear that the fact that the...

Trump has repeatedly claimed that prosecuting him for election interference is election interference. It is not. Trump is also claiming that Smith's new filing is election interference. It is not. It was judge Chutkan who made the decision to unseal the filing that is within her judicial...

Trump was indicted in 2023 for conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights. Prosecuting trump for his attempt to overturn the 2020 election that he lost and illegally stay in power is...

And when an individual has been indicted and criminally charged, it doesn't matter that the defendant is running for office or not. No one is above the law, or should get special treatment, including this defendant.

So true. Trump was not, and will not be, a president for all of America - just for MAGA America, the rich, big corporations, his cronies, and for himself.