Search results

Agreed, insane behavior. Exactly. And he was so close to being out of there, too!

She asked him to leave. He got dressed and reached the door. If she had prior intentions of being violent I don't think she would've waited for him to be dressed with one hand on the door and one with his phone camera. Can we at the very least not fabricate details? Lol

The filming is what caused the violence, can yall actually read oh my god he even said it himself. NOT THAT IT JUSTIFIES VIOLENCE, BTW But there was no violence prior to filming, so the video did not limit anything. He was about to head out (no altercation) and decided to start a camera...

Who said it was okay?

What's funny is your lack of reading comprehension. I kept saying I don't condone her actions and he should write a review but that video and thread are useless and clumsy. You're missing the point and being obtuse on purpose because you actively want to portray me as the kind of person I am...

That part made me actually laugh out loud. This guy has to be trolling us.

This! And not just this but many things in life!

You weren't merely recording a convo you were filming a person inside her home. Completely different rules for both. The "one-party consent" rule under Section 184 of the Criminal Code of Canada applies strictly to the audio portion of a recording. While it protects you when recording a...

Yes I wasn't trying to imply that you are looking for all day convo! I was talking in general. In my experience it isn't rare for indies do to a bit of conversation (especially with their returning clients), the only time it becomes a bother is when clients text all day or very very regularly...

Um.... me thinks you have the the timeline of events wrong

"Quite fast" after taking the time to open your phone camera and tell her that you were going to film her.... It is not. You weren't in public you were inside her home. You wrote a detailed account of sexual acts and claimed you were only 10min into the appointment, which strongly points to...

It's actually wildly ironic to bring out "impunity" while refusing to name her and admitting you didn't get your money back and the police didn't open a case. Textbook definition of impunity. Lol

Most? According to who? The vast majority of indies have exchanged texts with their clients before/after a booking. Just not all day every day like some would expect. We also tend to spend more time discussing the details of a booking (and in a more personalized fashion).

No, that's not what I'm saying. What I am saying is that laws don't always equal morals and that unfortunately you went about this the wrong way. You also have no grounds for a refund for illegal services in the first place. Not that it makes it ok for her to scam you.. I'm speaking of laws and...

There was no altercation. He initiated the video because he was mad she was asking him to leave and didn't give him a refund. For a service he wasn't even legally supposed to pay for in the first place. People get thrown out early without refund all the time, there's no shortage of reviews...

Unrelated but it's funny, the first time I was mentioned in this thread, you said in a comment that we had not yet met. Now that we have, would you have any comments regarding my ability to suck the soul out of people? Hahaha I feel like this guy repeatedly fails to understand the very simple...

Yeah so you hired an escort, filmed her illegally, posted it online, then posted the link to the video here while admitting sexual activity took place during said paid booking. I don't think you have a good understanding of laws and how these things work. Protection against... a person asking...

This is your reply after AnthonyAnderson's comment? Just say you don't know how a trial works and you hate women and call it a day.

Being a shitty violent person still does not justify misgendering someone. Sorry that happened to you, but there's really no need for that. Also, recording an escort because she asked you to leave *her place* is insane. Review boards exist for a reason. You legally cannot film someone inside...

They did increase it from last year!