Agency roster description incoherence ?does it bother you?

[BookerL]

Hi all

Does it bother you when you see descriptions that are incoherent ?
One example taken out of a posting today


Two gorgeous ladies however incoherent description ?

One is 5'8" 120lbs with natural DD's

The other one 5'4" 125lbs enhance DD's


Cheers


Booker

 

[UncleBob]

Aaahhh Kkkkk

Could you please enlighten me, where is the incoherence in these two different gorgeous lady descriptions?

 

[BookerL]

Aaahhh Kkkkk

Could you please enlighten me, where is the incoherence in these two different gorgeous lady descriptions?

Are you serious ?

Cheers

Booker

 

[BookerL]

It is common practice to lie about age and/or weight in this industry... don't tell me you're surprised lol
(I am not defending it...but I noticed it from day one.)

Thank you you are so nice !
Surprised !Hummmm !:lol:
It is not about the lie actually
Because I love a "good"lie ,accentuation on the word good or believable

Cheers


Booker

 

[UncleBob]

Are you serious ? Cheers Booker

I'm very serious. Cheers

A small girl with dds can weight more than a taller girl with dds and still be gorgeous. So where is the incoherence?
I don't see anything Not believable in the two descriptions you give in example. It would need pictures I guess.
The question however has already been discussed in previous threads before.

We like it or not, this is a marketing strategy for the kind of service offered. Some exagerate more than others. That is why reviews can help (not always).
Eventually, the agencies that exagerate too much become known quickly like MTLTOPGIRLS.
They use photoshop outrageously and you cannot rely to the description of their girls and the services offered.
However, the reviews let us know which of their girls are true gems. There are some hopefully.

 

[BookerL]

I'm very serious. Cheers

A small girl with dds can weight more than a taller girl with dds and still be gorgeous. So where is the incoherence?

Obviously both of them are .
UncleBob Natural Breast are heavier then fake Breast ,to you get the point !
Adding a few points Do real breasts or fake breasts weigh more?
http://www.answers.com/Q/Do_real_breasts_or_fake_breasts_weigh_more,

Allaboutbras
Answered Last
"Real breasts weigh more than silicone implants because of the higher specific gravity of muscle and blood "
http://www.realself.com/question/women-cups-dd-cups-experience-wieght-natural-cup
Weight of breast implants in relation to breast tissue
February 10th, 2011
+1
"For a given volume, saline implants weigh slightly more than breast tissue and silicone implants weigh slightly less."
Finally no consensus so I guess you will have to try it yourself!LOL
Natural breast floats fake breast doesn't

I don't see anything Not believable in the two descriptions you give in example. It would need pictures I guess.

Maybe you should host a topless pool party with ladies it would be a pleasure for your eyes and you would get to see the difference !:lol:

The question however has already been discussed in previous threads before.

Out of respect and courtesy for the ladies I did not identify who they where !

We like it or not, this is a marketing strategy for the kind of service offered. Some exagerate more than others. That is why reviews can help (not always)

If you would be familiar with the female weight curb you might get the unbelievable part
.

Eventually, the agencies that exagerate too much become known quickly like MTLTOPGIRLS.
They use photoshop outrageously and you cannot rely to the description of their girls and the services offered.

Good to know never been their !Thanks

However, the reviews let us know which of their girls are true gems. There are some hopefully.

But I do agree that the two ladies in this case are Gems ,,Its the description that promotes them that is not a gem


Cheers



Booker

 

[protagoras]

When it comes to agency roster description the things that are bothering me are grammar errors and wrong spellings, especially in French.

 

[rumpleforeskiin]

I'm with Uncle Bob on this one. First of all, the word you are looking for is "inconsistent" not "incoherent."

Second, a full-figured girl of 5'4" weighing 125 lbs is not at all unbelievable. Third, a slim girl of 5'8" weighing 120 lbs. is also not unbelievable. Believe it or not, there are parts of the body other than the breasts that have weight.

As for the term "gorgeous," that is typically meant to describe facial features, exclusive of weight or body type.

When it comes to agency roster description the things that are bothering me are grammar errors and wrong spellings, especially in French.

I'm also with Protagoras on this one. There's one popular agency which, on their website, often describes girls as "fucing hot one." This not only contains a mis-spelling, but contains no useful information. OK, it's also rather crude.

 

[UncleBob]

BL, the weight in girl descriptions is the overall girl weight, not Breast Only weight !?!?

 

[BookerL]

Hello rumples and all
Thanks for the lesson in English and escorting !

I'm with Uncle Bob on this one. First of all, the word you are looking for is

Lets see what Merriam Webster says ?

"inconsistent"

in·con·sis·tent adjective \-tənt\
: not always acting or behaving in the same way

: not continuing to happen or develop in the same way

: having parts that disagree with each other : not in agreement with something,http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inconsistent

"incoherent.

"in·co·her·ent adjective \-ənt\
: not able to talk or express yourself in a clear way that can be easily understood

: not logical or well-organized : not easy to understand,http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incoherent

Second, a full-figured girl of 5'4" weighing 125 lbs is not at all unbelievable. Third, a slim girl of 5'8" weighing 120 lbs. is also not unbelievable.

Its actually the comparison between the specific ones that makes it unbelievable not the stats themselve

Believe it or not, there are parts of the body other than the breasts that have weight.

Euh ,Deuh I guess I am one of does suckers

As for the term "gorgeous," that is typically meant to describe facial features, exclusive of weight or body type.

Ok and ?

I'm also with Protagoras on this one. There's one popular agency which, on their website, often describes girls as "fucing hot one." This not only contains a mis-spelling, but contains no useful information. OK, it's also rather crude.

Would that be inconsistent or incoherent ?:lol:

Chill out



Booker

 

[BookerL]

BL, the weight in girl descriptions is the overall girl weight, not Breast Only weight !?!?

Thank you for reminding me !



Sincerely



Booker

 

[hungry101]

I sure appreciate MOJO's web site. they frequently show girls faces. They show tattoos as they are and they add videos that would be much more difficult to photo shop I believe. Now if I find out that the girls actually will dress like they do in the pictures then I am going to be the next Teddy.

 

[BookerL]

I am going to be the next Teddy.

Maybe you will have to stand in line panthere has already sent is request !And many others !:lol:


Cheers



Booker

 

[protagoras]

Would that be inconsistent or incoherent ?:lol:

Chill out





Booker

Inconstitently incoherent....

 

[BookerL]

Inconstitently incoherent....

Lol!:lol:
Warm Regards

Booker

 

[wasisname]

Obviously both of them are .
UncleBob Natural Breast are heavier then fake Breast ,to you get the point !
Natural breast floats fake breast doesn't

r

errr. No. Just no.
That which floats would have less density than that which sinks. Therefore for the same volume a natural breast would be lighter not heavier. That is assuming fakes don't float.

Sometimes I wonder if you just post random shit because you like to read what you type.


The 5'4 thing with DD bolt ons are believeable.

5'8 120punds with natural DDs are a bit more difficult. That is an 18.2 BMI. If she does have significant body fat she must have a brutally tiny bone structure. One would expect such a girl to be very lean and leaness gets rid of tits which is why female fitness and bodybuilder competeters with their ripped abs often get boltons. That being said, there are some nonfat girls with pretty impressive natural tits.
I'd guess she isn't really 120 pounds.
Now with boltons it is a different story. You can slap 10 pounds of boltons to say Little Cinerella the porn chick and get a 80 pound 4'10 girl with massive tits.

However I am going to guess you will disagree with this because well just because.

 

[BookerL]

Hello wasisname;

I do love you analysis ,you are one of my favorite poster :thumb:

errr. No. Just no.
That which floats would have less density than that which sinks. Therefore for the same volume a natural breast would be lighter not heavier. That is assuming fakes don't float.

Ok you are right I am wrong saline water weighs more then mammary glands and fat cells

Natural Breast are heavier then fake Breast ,to you get the point !
Adding a few points Do real breasts or fake breasts weigh more?
http://www.answers.com/Q/Do_real_breasts_or_fake_breasts_weigh_more,

Allaboutbras
Answered Last
"Real breasts weigh more than silicone implants because of the higher specific gravity of muscle and blood "
http://www.realself.com/question/women-cups-dd-cups-experience-wieght-natural-cup
Weight of breast implants in relation to breast tissue
February 10th, 2011
+1
"For a given volume, saline implants weigh slightly more than breast tissue and silicone implants weigh slightly less."
Finally no consensus so I guess you will have to try it yourself!LOL

Sometimes I wonder if you just post random shit because you like to read what you type.

Sometimes you just need to get over it !:yield::yield::yield:

The 5'4 thing with DD bolt ons are believeable.

I do agree

5'8 120punds with natural DDs are a bit more difficult. That is an 18.2 BMI. If she does have significant body fat she must have a brutally tiny bone structure. One would expect such a girl to be very lean and leaness gets rid of tits which is why female fitness and bodybuilder competeters with their ripped abs often get boltons. That being said, there are some nonfat girls with pretty impressive natural tits.
I'd guess she isn't really 120 pounds.

Well maybe more likely

Now with boltons it is a different story. You can slap 10 pounds of boltons to say Little Cinerella the porn chick and get a 80 pound 4'10 girl with massive tits.

I agree

However I am going to guess you will disagree with this because well just because.

Just continue to guess you will go far in life !:lol:

And fat doesn't float ?


Chill out



Booker

 

[patrickcun]

Moi je suis un amateur de fesses, alors sur les pics je l'ai regarde tres attentivement, je peux vous dire que la plupart des agences photoshop cette partie du corps de leurs SP, j'ai remarqué que lorsqu'elles sont photoshopé elle sont un peu pâle et tres lisse, petit tuyau.

 

[wasisname]

Actually above I did say fat does float. Or I implied it. Thus fat being less dense than bolt ons again if we assume they sink.

On a semi related note. Little Cinderella with say F sized bolt ons. I'd like to see that, at least as a freak show kinda thing. They would be bigger than she is. I saw her in clothing getting weighed and she was 73 pounds.
Maya Mason 5'1 110s went from an A to a D myself I would be content either way. I am suprised she is listed at 110, she is quite thin.

I wonder who is the tiniest girl with Alyssa Alps/Minka style bolts on is. Like one of the above or a Kennedy Kressler or a Zoe Kush.

 

[anon_vlad]

Take a look at Electra who is debuting for topmontrealescorts.com tonight. She is advertised as 5'5" 125, only a little less than their only other SP tonight. Compare their pictures. I would happily spot the agency 10 lbs. and bet $1K a pound on the over on Electra.

Assuming that their description was not a typo, it amuses rather than annoys me and destroys, in my eyes, the credibility of the agency.