Hello people,
The effectiveness of this strategy is evident by the very low casualty figures from more than 2000 rockets lunched. I believe only 3 or 5 people were killed by the direct rocket hit. People are seeing how it works with their own eyes and it provides enormous psychological effect. It is simply marvellous to track the bullet and hit it with other bullet in a few seconds or even fraction of a second.
You know easyguy...I get it,...I think we all get it. Technology can be like that guardian angel that removes our fears and endows ALMOST certain immunity, at least of a sort from one angle. Still, I can't help but find it a little bit...ish...that the fact "only 3 or 5 people were killed" gets dismissed so blithely like those people were just numbers in a math problem. Yes, I get that in the grand scheme of things the losses are infinitesimal. Still, not so dismissible if they were your own wife, kid, parents as they were for someone. Yes, we get it. Still, while taking some kind of exultant joy in the math I think you missed the point that missiles are falling and being fired back on the other side where 100s of innocents on the other side are being brutally torn and killed like the 3 or 5 being dismissed like numbers instead of lives in this grand nirvana of technological victory.
The real victory is to stop missiles from flying at all and not having to use Iron Dome, NOT dismissing 3 or 5 and forgetting the 100s. And, by stopping it I don't mean blowing up those firing the rockets, I mean removing the hatred that brings the desire to fire them. Your technological victories offer one side great security, security that probably creates a psychology that will keep the Israelis from feeling like they have to make any deal while the 100s multiply into 1000s and continue to make Iron Dome a necessary fact of life that really symbolizes the tragedy that the real danger will continue.
If I were an Israeli I'd also be thinking how great this defense system is, but never get so smug as to forget the underlying tragedy goes on and on. A life is a life regardless of sides. Despite my support for dealing with terrorists this is a catch 22 situation. Your grand technological victory is breeding more terrorists...not really solving the danger.
BTW - the lesson of history is that one technological panacea eventually gets trumped by another...then on and on. There once was a man who feared his foes and so he created the club and felt secure, then his enemies developed and ax, his enemies developed a spear, his enemies developed a bow, his enemies developed a gun...then artillery...then aircraft...then missiles...then Iron Dome...then................
.
Cheers guy,
Merlot