Please vote: Which of these 2 girls is more attractive?

[Ducon]

Here are 2 photos of very similar ladies.
They are so similar, the only difference is the thighs.

Elise, from Montreal Sex City, has thinner thighs:
http://www.montrealsexcity.com/photos/elise1.jpg
Megane, from Babi-o-spa, has stronger thighs:
http://www.babi-o-spa.com/photos/megane05.jpg

Please vote, tell which one you think is more attractive.
Don't try to find out which one is photoshopped, don't just vote for the one you think is real. We'll talk about that later.
This is just a blind test,
just vote for the one you think is more attractive.

The reason I'm doing this vote will be explained a bit later in a personal rant in another post.

 

[Ducon]

now, the explanation

Do did you vote?
if you did, now you can read my explanation.

I get really pissed of when a girl tells me "I don't like my legs, they are too fat"
Who decided that legs should be thin? Where did they get that idea from?
Is it really what men want?
Or is it what girls tell each other ? or the impression they get from the fashion magazines ( made by women I suspect ) with anorexic girls on the cover?

I like strong curvaceous feminine legs, strong thighs and calves, and I wonder why women think otherwise.
First, I want to know what men really prefer ( hence the poll )
then I want to know who decided to photoshop this girl's thighs to make them thinner. Is it a woman ?
is it really worth it?
Falsifying a photo is one thing, but falsifying to make it less attractive ??
Some people's criteria for beauty are really weird, I wonder where they come from.

 

[Ducon]

"oh, it's the same girl and same photo, so I vote for the 4th option"

ok, for those who don't understand the sarcasm, I'll make it more clear:
It is different versions of the same photo, one has been digitally modified. They are different.

 

[danielle333]

Both are very nice. Amazing ass but the first one has better lighting

 

[General Gonad]

I'd do them both!

GG

 

[metoo4]

I'd say they are both "photoshopped"! Hard to say for shure without being able to see "bigger picture".

The girl might be cute, no matter the tighs/ass but the "photoshop" job make both pictures unattractive to me because the job is poorly done and I can't get myself to appreciate something not real.

I do know "curvacious" girls who are "hot"!

 

[Montreal Sex City]

Do did you vote?
if you did, now you can read my explanation.

I get really pissed of when a girl tells me "I don't like my legs, they are too fat"
Who decided that legs should be thin? Where did they get that idea from?
Is it really what men want?
Or is it what girls tell each other ? or the impression they get from the fashion magazines ( made by women I suspect ) with anorexic girls on the cover?

I like strong curvaceous feminine legs, strong thighs and calves, and I wonder why women think otherwise.
First, I want to know what men really prefer ( hence the poll )
then I want to know who decided to photoshop this girl's thighs to make them thinner. Is it a woman ?
is it really worth it?
Falsifying a photo is one thing, but falsifying to make it less attractive ??
Some people's criteria for beauty are really weird, I wonder where they come from.

One thing I can say for sure ...
Both pictures shows a lady that weight 120 lbs
and not 105 lbs like were she was listed before ...

http://www.montrealsecretaffairs.com/mia.htm

I have voted # 3 !

 

[ZoneAlarm]

One thing I can say for sure ...
Both pictures shows a lady that weight 120 lbs
and not 105 lbs like were she was listed before ...

http://www.montrealsecretaffairs.com/mia.htm
I have voted # 3 !

Jessy is right, i voted #3 aswell, also Duncan, i hope ur not turning into a Mini Robertpal

 

[ZoneAlarm]

105 lbs per leg is accurate, I would say. (stie que j'suis chien dès fois)

What is the point of an immature statement like this one? (Stie qu'il a des gens stupide des fois.)

I voted #3 in the modified Poll '' don't know / don't care / don't understand / Get a life, Ziggy Montana''

 

[Special K]

Put both pictures next to eachother and click on them, you'll be able to see the Elise picture had some meat removed from the rear of her right leg and the lighting has been enhanced. Not a big deal really but photoshopped nonetheless.

 

[Ducon]

Jessy is right, i voted #3 aswell, also Duncan, i hope ur not turning into a Mini Robertpal

No you don't. You'd love another robertpal. Don't lie.
You love spending your time flaming him when you could just ignore him instead.
By the way, who is Duncan?

Oh yes, Jessy is right to use the "yeah but others are liars too" excuse to falsify a photo.
Since when was this ever a valid excuse?? It's pathetic.

Now if some hobbyists start defending the practice of falsifying pictures, the situation is even worse than I thought..

So Jessy, whose idea was it?

 

[General Gonad]

If you look at this pic, you see that she is a little chunky in the trunky:

http://www.babi-o-spa.com/photos/megane06.jpg

I'd still do her.

GG

 

[Montreal Sex City]

No you don't. You'd love another robertpal. Don't lie.
You love spending your time flaming him when you could just ignore him instead.
By the way, who is Duncan?

Oh yes, Jessy is right to use the "yeah but others are liars too" excuse to falsify a photo.
Since when was this ever a valid excuse?? It's pathetic.

Now if some hobbyists start defending the practice of falsifying pictures, the situation is even worse than I thought..

So Jessy, whose idea was it?

Mr. Ducon,

I always like these kind of discussions you know,
yes that you know too well.

So I guess that we are all a greater falsifyers out there since light
is use at the right place, filters are also use on the pics, tattoos are
removed, ajustement of the color of the skin is done to remove beauty
marks, birth marks, scars etc... And why do we do this ? To keep the
idendity of the lady secret. And I guess you never tought about this.

Oh so lyers we are all, were is the juge so then we get all sentenced ! ...

It's all good for me, as usual I assume what I do.
But what you don't know is Elise and I know each other for more then
2 years now and knowing this picture ain't recent, I have took the
decision to make it a bit accurate. Since client wish to have temporary
pics instead of nothing, I requested one from Elise till the photographer
comes back from his trip.

Thanks Ducon for comparing both pictures. Thanks for revealing where
she works the rest of the time, thanks for exposing Elise to this.

She is coming to work today, I will tell her about your nice unpleasant
action and it may just result to removing her pic, not having anymore
(just in case you would then want to compare the old ones and the new)
and above, just to make sure no one finds out who she really is, in a
no-review policy wish.

Have a nice day Ducon, and I do still think you need a life.

 

[General Gonad]

She is coming to work today, I will tell her about your nice unpleasantaction and it may just result to removing her pic, not having anymore
(just in case you would then want to compare the old ones and the new)
and above, just to make sure no one finds out who she really is, in a
no-review policy wish.

Have a nice day Duncon, and I do still think you need a life.

Jessy,

It was only a matter of time before people found out. I suggest you use another pic next time you introduce a lady who also works at an erotic massage parlor.

GG

 

[EagerBeaver]

Their is not one agency website that does not photoshop their photo's not 1. Some do it simply to cover the face, other's to fix lighting, remove tatoo's. I dont think any of you an deny this right? So whats the big deal with Jessy fixing a 'temporary' photo of a girl who is in my opinion very good looking before and after.

Ducon,

ZA is right that there is not a single agency that does not photoshop their photos to protect potentially identifying features like tattoos, piercings etc. If they didn't photoshop the pics, they would arguably be invading the lady's privacy unless she consented to have untouched pics posted. It is not by any means an industry standard to post untouched pics. In fact, several agencies that have not been careful in this regard ended up with problems when family members or friends identified the escort through the untouched pics, leading the escort to leave the business after having been "outed."

Ducon, there are B&S agencies out there which are posting FAKE pics, i.e., the girl in the pic is not even the same lady. Instead of wasting your time and energy on a thread like this, why don't you invest some time and energy into exposing those agencies - which, by the ways, there are many such agencies out there waiting for you to expose them. But MSC is not one of them.

 

[Ducon]

And why do we do this ? To keep the
idendity of the lady secret. And I guess you never tought about this.

No , I never thought that the thigh alteration would protect her identity. I must be too stupid.
Your guess is both false and off-topic.

Thanks Ducon for comparing both pictures. Thanks for revealing where
she works the rest of the time, thanks for exposing Elise to this.

If you wanted this to be hidden, you wouldn't have put her photo on the internet. You know, the internet? the thing everyone can see?

Will the flow of bullshit punctuated with happy smileys ever end?
So yes, in summary, let's just pretend that I'm stupid and that I'm the bad guy, that will do the trick nicely.