Hello Everyone:
I wanted to place a thought out there and open it up for some intelligent discussion and possibly implement a voluntary change to how we score sessions with escorts.
I want to put forward the following statement: The current scoring system and categories used are outdated and no longer provide a reliable measure of service provided.
I have noticed a trend and have discussed it privately with some friends of mine that are also long time hobbyists as well as posters to boards such as this. The trend is that the girls reviewed tend to be skewed much more to the higher end of the scores. Rather than a bell shaped curve as we would see in a normal distribution, this is more the inverse of that, meaning the frequency of bad and very good scores far outnumber the middle range. Girls either get glowing "OMG marry me and have my baby" reviews or "I hope you die in your own vomit" reviews. Of course I just exxaggarated that for illustration purposes, but hopefully you get the general idea.
Currently we use 3 categories: Looks, Attitude, Service and we score them on a 1-5 (5 being best). While this might have served well for us in the past this is no longer the case. We post these reviews for a number of reasons. First to notify our fellow hobbyists of good and bad service providers and agencies, kinda to watch each other's back. Second so that we can in effect if not in practice give feedback to the agencies/owners/girls on how they performed. Regarding this second point, as it's clearly evident on both this board and the other, the agency owners have a vested interest in keeping their agency in a favorable light.
Ok that being said, the problem with just having 3 categories is that they are not "actionable", in order for feedback to be actionable, it needs to be more focused. Take for example there is an escort who is dressed neatly, manicured/makeup down well....but for whatever reason....smells, but the smell might be just a bit minor (ie, hot summer montreal day...etc, so while it wasn't desierable it wasn't indicative of a more serious hygiene problem. Sure in this case a reviewer might post that she was a 4.5/5.0 (taking off the .5 for the smell), unfortunately for us and for the escort/agency they can't take corrective action on that because they can't determine what caused that loss of the .5 pt unless it was specifically mentioned in the review. Whereas, if the "Looks" category was broken out into more actionable ratings,...lets say.
Remove: "Looks"
Add: Physical Beauty
Add: Personal Presentation
Add: Cleanliness/Hygiene
All 3 of those are much more direct things that a girl can correct.
Having given an example of why I feel the current system doesn't work let me now pust my suggested new categories.
Remove: "Looks"
Add: "Physical Beauty" (is she pretty)
Add: "Personal Presentation" (does she dress/present herself well)
Add: "Cleanliness/Hygiene" (are all the minimum hygiene needs met)
Remove: "Attitude"
Add: "Friendly/Courteous" (is she sociable and feminine)
Add: "Accomdating" (is she open to the customer's desires)
Add: "Warm/Inviting" (does she provide an intimate feel)
Remove: "Service"
Add: "Sexual Talent" (can she suck a dick like a pro?)
Add: "Sexual Variety" (does she just just want to lay on her back?)
Add: "Wild Child Factor" (does she get freaky..ok this one is a bit of a stretch)
I think the 5 point scale should be changed to a 4 pt scale. This forces the reviewer to take a stand. Most times it seems that when people give a "3" score they really have a negative association with that score but for social reasons are being polite. For our purposes, to maximize service, we should not be worried to pick a side, either you like them or you didn't, and then the degree to which you liked them.
1: Bad
2: Fair
3: Good
4: Great
Ok well now that I've said all this, let's open it up to some discussion. Remember our goal is to improve the quality of the reviews, to then help steer the agencies and the girls to improve their service. It's a win/win for all of us.
Best Regards,
Kazunori
I wanted to place a thought out there and open it up for some intelligent discussion and possibly implement a voluntary change to how we score sessions with escorts.
I want to put forward the following statement: The current scoring system and categories used are outdated and no longer provide a reliable measure of service provided.
I have noticed a trend and have discussed it privately with some friends of mine that are also long time hobbyists as well as posters to boards such as this. The trend is that the girls reviewed tend to be skewed much more to the higher end of the scores. Rather than a bell shaped curve as we would see in a normal distribution, this is more the inverse of that, meaning the frequency of bad and very good scores far outnumber the middle range. Girls either get glowing "OMG marry me and have my baby" reviews or "I hope you die in your own vomit" reviews. Of course I just exxaggarated that for illustration purposes, but hopefully you get the general idea.
Currently we use 3 categories: Looks, Attitude, Service and we score them on a 1-5 (5 being best). While this might have served well for us in the past this is no longer the case. We post these reviews for a number of reasons. First to notify our fellow hobbyists of good and bad service providers and agencies, kinda to watch each other's back. Second so that we can in effect if not in practice give feedback to the agencies/owners/girls on how they performed. Regarding this second point, as it's clearly evident on both this board and the other, the agency owners have a vested interest in keeping their agency in a favorable light.
Ok that being said, the problem with just having 3 categories is that they are not "actionable", in order for feedback to be actionable, it needs to be more focused. Take for example there is an escort who is dressed neatly, manicured/makeup down well....but for whatever reason....smells, but the smell might be just a bit minor (ie, hot summer montreal day...etc, so while it wasn't desierable it wasn't indicative of a more serious hygiene problem. Sure in this case a reviewer might post that she was a 4.5/5.0 (taking off the .5 for the smell), unfortunately for us and for the escort/agency they can't take corrective action on that because they can't determine what caused that loss of the .5 pt unless it was specifically mentioned in the review. Whereas, if the "Looks" category was broken out into more actionable ratings,...lets say.
Remove: "Looks"
Add: Physical Beauty
Add: Personal Presentation
Add: Cleanliness/Hygiene
All 3 of those are much more direct things that a girl can correct.
Having given an example of why I feel the current system doesn't work let me now pust my suggested new categories.
Remove: "Looks"
Add: "Physical Beauty" (is she pretty)
Add: "Personal Presentation" (does she dress/present herself well)
Add: "Cleanliness/Hygiene" (are all the minimum hygiene needs met)
Remove: "Attitude"
Add: "Friendly/Courteous" (is she sociable and feminine)
Add: "Accomdating" (is she open to the customer's desires)
Add: "Warm/Inviting" (does she provide an intimate feel)
Remove: "Service"
Add: "Sexual Talent" (can she suck a dick like a pro?)
Add: "Sexual Variety" (does she just just want to lay on her back?)
Add: "Wild Child Factor" (does she get freaky..ok this one is a bit of a stretch)
I think the 5 point scale should be changed to a 4 pt scale. This forces the reviewer to take a stand. Most times it seems that when people give a "3" score they really have a negative association with that score but for social reasons are being polite. For our purposes, to maximize service, we should not be worried to pick a side, either you like them or you didn't, and then the degree to which you liked them.
1: Bad
2: Fair
3: Good
4: Great
Ok well now that I've said all this, let's open it up to some discussion. Remember our goal is to improve the quality of the reviews, to then help steer the agencies and the girls to improve their service. It's a win/win for all of us.
Best Regards,
Kazunori
