Should agencies be forced to provide pics of each lady?

[General Gonad]

I am following up on my "pictures thread" to ask the members of this board a question: should agencies be forced to provide pics of each lady? In particular, should the board implement a new rule that any agency that does not provide pics of all the SPs working for them should not be allowed to advertise here?

Let me know what you think.

GG

 

[rumpleforeskiin]

I wanna be there when you tell Fred that he's not allowed to take the money of an agency that doesn't post it's pictures promptly.

 

[General Gonad]

Who cares about what Fred Zed thinks?!?!

I wanna be there when you tell Fred that he's not allowed to take the money of an agency that doesn't post it's pictures promptly.

Uuuummmm, I don't care about what Fred Zed thinks. The success of his board depends on his ability to attract members, not agencies who provide no pics.

GG

 

[General Gonad]

What I would apppreciate from the owners is an indication when they post about a new girl that there is presently no photo on the site... this saves me the frustration of looking for it.

At the very least, but I still think too many owners jump the gun, introducing ladies with no pics. If a client is going to fork over money to rent a room and call an SP, the least an agency owner can do is spend some money on a photo shoot and stop giving us excuses of why they can't coordinate schedules or find their webmasters who are vacationing in Mexico.

GG

 

[Love big tits]

too many owners jump the gun, introducing ladies with no pics

I definetly agree with your statement and I would love myself to see pictures pronto and would have booked many ladies much earlier and more often (since I like to repeat)

but

I think it is still going on that way because they are still customers booking the girls with no pictures, probably less so, but the owner and the SP are still making money in the mean time.

Let's not forget also ladies who do not want pictures period. But that is an other story

 

[General Gonad]

I think it is still going on that way because they are still customers booking the girls with no pictures, probably less so, but the owner and the SP are still making money in the mean time.

Let's not forget also ladies who do not want pictures period. But that is an other story

LBT,

There are ways to take pics and still guard a lady's privacy. At least show us her body. This practice is still going on because Merbites are not demanding that agencies with no pics should not be allowed to advertise. Unless we demand it, the owners will keep introducing ladies with no pics.

GG

 

[naughtylady]

Uuuummmm, I don't care about what Fred Zed thinks. The success of his board depends on his ability to attract members, not agencies who provide no pics.

GG

YOU are forgetting that Fred makes his money from the advertisers and not from the members.

Heck some JdM agencies and indies have no pics no web site and still are reviewed here.

Ronnie,
Naughtylady

 

[General Gonad]

YOU are forgetting that Fred makes his money from the advertisers and not from the members.

Heck some JdM agencies and indies have no pics no web site and still are reviewed here.

And who do the advertisers make their money from? On your other point, I wouldn't allow reviews of non-paying advertisers. Why give them free exposure?

GG

 

[stacey.1985]

Well I think the lady should be able to choose if she wants to have her picture on the internet. Some prefer no pictures of the face, while others hide there face.

Remember that some of us are still in college or university Or others are teachers

 

[General Gonad]

Remember that some of us are still in college or university Or others are teachers

Can you tutor me?

GG

P.S. You can still hide faces in pics.

 

[Special K]

I don't think an agency should be forced to provide pictures of the girls, would it make things better for the client? Of course it would but it should be completely up to the discretion of the provider whether or not they want pictures out there. Would it be better for that providers business...most definitely but in rare cases such as with Marika of Xxxtase I don't think it makes a difference. There's no pics of her but from all the amazing things I've heard about her from very reliable sources I would be honored to meet her without having seen a picture.

In most cases it will definitely benefit their business if they have some picture rather than none, even a digital cam pic would suffice if there's a delay in getting a professional photographer.

 

[metoo4]

You know GG, you should start your own website! It could be named MORAESRB!

My Own Ranting About Escorts Stuff Review Board.

You could be the owner, president-director-General, mod, web designer, head of marketing, censorship board, rule maker, judge and jury...

Of course, it would be a lonely job, with almost no advertizer, almost no members... But hey! If that's what it takes so you have it your way, I think it's worth a try!

For now, not much you can do!

 

[rumpleforeskiin]

You know GG, you should start your own website! It could be named MORAESRB!

My Own Ranting About Escorts Stuff Review Board.

You could be the owner, president-director-General, mod, web designer, head of marketing, censorship board, rule maker, judge and jury...

Of course, it would be a lonely job, with almost no advertizer, almost no members... But hey! If that's what it takes so you have it your way, I think it's worth a try!

For now, not much you can do!

If GG put as much energy into ending the genocide in Darfur as he does into spewing about SPs, agencies, and clients, he could probably put an end to it. I guess he has nothing better to do with his time.

 

[korbel]

Force

Hello GG,

Personally, I see no reason why the ladies and/or agencies should be against having a faceless photo on the websites unless they feel any possible photo might work against their chance to profit. On the other hand, forcing them to do so is impractical. You are taking away the ladies choice, and you are forcing an extra expense on the agency as well as putting the agency in a position of forcing their ladies to possibly do something they choose not to.
Really GG this isn't the way.

No force,

Korbel

 

[naughtylady]

T-76>>> ROFLMAO!!!! I Love your sense of humor!

Ronnie,
Naughtylady

 

[General Gonad]

I don't think an agency should be forced to provide pictures of the girls, would it make things better for the client? Of course it would but it should be completely up to the discretion of the provider whether or not they want pictures out there. Would it be better for that providers business...most definitely but in rare cases such as with Marika of Xxxtase I don't think it makes a difference. There's no pics of her but from all the amazing things I've heard about her from very reliable sources I would be honored to meet her without having seen a picture.

SK,

I saw Marika and she is a jaw-dropping sexy knockout. The difference there is that I TRUST Martin of XXXtase. When Martin of XXXtase tells me a lady is hot, she is hot. Some others, including Martin of Asservissante have let me down when recommending ladies with no pics (I have yet to meet Kelly).

Should it be up to the provider? Yes and no. If they all had a choice, there would be no pics. Why is it that every Eleganza lady has her pics on the site? There are ways to take pics without revealing personal details on someone.

Then again, we can let t76 come on the boards and manifest all she wants against everything I propose. I had a great day, more fun, less t76 and Merb bullshit.

Grand Gourou

 

[Special K]

Should it be up to the provider? Yes and no. If they all had a choice, there would be no pics. Why is it that every Eleganza lady has her pics on the site? There are ways to take pics without revealing personal details on someone.

The problem here is that there have been numerous girls on Eleganza's site who have had people recognize their photos and had to quit the business. One of my best experiences of 2007 comes to mind in a young lady I believe by the name of Jasmine (my memory sure isn't what it used to be) who then changed her name to something else before having to retire.

PS...13 posts in one day for me, I'm on a GG pace here!!

 

[General Gonad]

The problem here is that there have been numerous girls on Eleganza's site who have had people recognize their photos and had to quit the business. One of my best experiences of 2007 comes to mind in a young lady I believe by the name of Jasmine (my memory sure isn't what it used to be) who then changed her name to something else before having to retire.

Another one is Brittany but I doubt you are shedding a tear because she retired after her boyfriend recognized her.

GG

P.S. Imagine if there were no pics and each encounter needed some guy to TOFTT. I'd be one busy guy!

 

[General Gonad]

C'est parce qu'une fille qui ne cache pas entièrement son visage peut être reconnue. J'ai déjà reconnue des filles moi par le bas de leur visage à cause d'un trait particulier à la forme de leur visage

Exactly, if they hid their faces entirely, there is almost zero chance that someone would recognize them.

GG

 

[RogerRabbit]

Established agencies

The high-class indies almost all have their own websites with some pictures. Why should not it be the same with agencies? Since some time, I only book with indies or established agencies who post pics of their ladies. I also book with some ladies without pictures but I know from many years. I don't expect to meet a new one without pics or VERY VERY good reviews and description.

Not posting pics always introduces some doubts. Do you like doubts?