so theres these 2 website wich im sure are run by close friends clients..i went on simpcity they have a lot of videos from onlyfans but mostly are the free tease that everyone can see..some are clips from the onlyfans aacounts of the girls but are rare the guys that share these.its suppose tobe a sharing website but you cant respond or asked for infos cause you need to like a lots of things people post and sometimes posts pics of the girls!..its run by close friends that there aalowed to post things and respond but you cant until you go up a latter it seems.whats the point then if you cant posts and respond...the other one is camwhores..this one is the worst!..again its run by private friends and you cant see other people videos they put up unlless your friends with you.heres the catch..no one accepts you as a friend!! so you cant see the videos but between them they accept eachother ect..so again whats the point of having these 2 website open for the public if its a close thing between buddies!
simp city & camwhores
- Thread starter frankyboy711
- Start date
Are you complaining about not having access to stolen content? What even is this thread lol! You can subscribe to people's onlyfans if you'd like to see their content instead of trying to see it on leak websites.
"That one is the worst" I agree but for different reasons. These sites are the worst, not because you can't interact or see all the content. They're the worst because they're full of stolen content that the sex workers didn't agree to post there. They're the worst because minors have easy access to these sites and can see our stolen content, too. Many reasons why I dislike these sites but none of these reasons involve a man's boner and wants tbh
"That one is the worst" I agree but for different reasons. These sites are the worst, not because you can't interact or see all the content. They're the worst because they're full of stolen content that the sex workers didn't agree to post there. They're the worst because minors have easy access to these sites and can see our stolen content, too. Many reasons why I dislike these sites but none of these reasons involve a man's boner and wants tbh
Maybe stick to free porn, would be a little less disappointing for you it seems.
I only know this one, not the first, but from what i understand to be "accepted" as a friend you need to do like them, upload a lot of content. This is basically a form of "trading". So if you have no videos uploaded, they refuse you directly.
Totally get your point there. And of course there is a morality issue with piracy. That said, and im sure you will disagree with me there but it is what it is, i do think prices on Onlyfans (on top of the gambling nature of it, like no preview, false descriptions etc) are way too high and some form of "group purchase" is a good thing. By that i mean everybody contribute to a purchase of a scene. Now i know the creators are against it, but when i buy a scene, im sorry but its my right to keep acces to it, so i download it. I been screwed over by onlyfans before, like litterally videos i bough disapeared from my purchases for no reason. So i make sure i save everything. I paid for it, therefore its mine. In that same sentiment when a scenes is like 50$+ in Canadian $ and a few guys are willing to contribute and split the price in 3 or such, then we all get the scene and i feel this price is more reasonable.
Peoples do this all the time for various things. As a teen we used to buy cassette tapes of music and we would make copies for all our friends. Netflix sharing been a thing for as long as it exist (i know they trying to crack on this now), You can even game share on your video games on Xbox with another person if you chose to (its limited to 2 peoples tough).
Digital content always been in that "grey area" morally. I mean unlike a movie on disc you don't need to send a physical item to a person for sharing it. I don't think anyone would be against if i bough a movie on disc and 5 friends would borrow it over time, or lets say i host a movie night and have friends over and we watch it then, its seen as fine right? With a digital file, well its a file so you can just copy it, but the same concept kinda apply in my opinion. I don't see it the same as being available online for everyone aka actual piracy.
I think rent prices are far too high so should I start breaking into people's properties and staying there for free? Maybe I could even start threads on housing forums complaining about the ones that have locked doors that make it hard for me to break into?
My issue isn't with people downloading content they paid for, my issue is people who upload that content without the creators consent on other platforms, or who go out of their way to watch the stolen content in question
(As for the prices being too high I guess that depends on your perception. My subscription price costs less than a movie at the movie theater and the movie isn't as long as the sum of my content so it's all about perspective (and the different ways creators operate their pages) I guess?)
I can agree with you that online upload is certainly an issue. It was not what i was mentioning but just "shared purchases" among a few guys. I think digital content is a lot more of a grey area than actual physical goods. Yes we all saw those "you wouldn't steal a car" message at the beginning of the DVDs in the 2000s where they tried to make it 1 for 1 with that, but there is a lot of argument that was made by peoples that a lot of time lets say you downloaded a song or even an album, it was not necessarely something you would had buy. Sometimes it could even end up as you like it so much you go out of your way to buy it and buy the other albums of the same band. Anyway that was a big debate during the Napster/Kazaa days.
As for the prices it really depend on the creators. I am not familiar with yours per say, but i subscribed to some OF that were extremely disapointing, like no nudity on wall and absurde prices for so little in PPVs, like a 30 sec vid for 30$US... Often with no previews or anything. Sometimes i wait til an OF is "on sale" at 5$ or so, but even then i feel disapointed to see the content (and 5$ turn out close to 10 with the currency disparity + fees + taxes). I am also questioning how they can get away with the law by charging in US$ (not even disclosing it), then adding canadian taxes to an US$ ammount... Maybe its totally legal, i dunno, im not a lawyer, but i find it very shady and questionable.
Ah, well considering this entire conversation/thread is about leak sites I thought you replied to me with the topic at hand in mind, hence why we aren't talking about the same thing I guess, haha
Understandable. I just mentioned an alternative to save a bit on cost. Like i said being 2-3 guys "contributing" for a purchase. Or in some other cases we "trade" 1 for 1. Like he give 1 scene, i give 1. Its technically "sharing content" but thats not as "blatantly damaging" as uploading on a website where hundred if not thousand of peoples can download.
When it comes to digital content this a big issue to me that it has no resale value. For instance i have hundreds of video games digitally, some i played and will never touch again because they were not as good as i expected or maybe i just don't feel the need to replay them even if they were enjoyable. Back in the days with games on cartdridges or discs, i could either sell them trough Kijiji or whatever, or bring them back to a store for credit value. Sure sometimes they would not give a lot, but there was still a return on investement. With digital games they just sit there and i can't do ANYTHING with them.
This can also kinda be applied to porn. It was possible to resale DVDs. I did got to 18 y.o in the early 2000s, so Brazzers and the boom of internet porn came not long after, but i did bough some DVDs from my local video store or online. I sold some back when i didn't felt like watching them again as well. But with digital... well you download and then ok... nothing much you can do with.
Similar threads
