mazingerz said:50%? Wow, c'est de la taxe ça!
Halloween Mike said:But how the hell they can do it, i mean they don't know how much client a girl can see per days
Kepler said:En fait, l'article mentionne qu'elle devrait aussi payer une TVA de 19%, donc ironiquement un total de 69% de taxes.
Plumbers, taxi drivers, and almost anyone else can also get away with tax evasion. The government has ways of detecting this in many cases (eg: lifestyle /cash flow analysis).
eastender said:The revenue people have models for every business niche that are accurate to within 3-5%. The problem is that those who try to get away with tax evasion never agree on how to do it so auditors see interesting data like two pizza restaurants in the same area order nearly identical quantities of ingredients BUT reporting sales that are 50% apart so one is evading.
Dr Edgar Who said:Mademoiselle, you bought 30 pairs of panties, ten bottles of perfume and 3000$ worth of makeup this year, our mathematical model tells us that...
eastender said:Not really. More like agency AA, spent $x on advertising during the year, had Y girls working at $180 per hour, T phone calls and M emails. Advertising should be about 8-10% of revenues which should have generated about 12.875% in GST/PST which we did not get nor our share of taxes on net revenues.
The work logs for the ladies pro rate down to, resulting in an estimate for each.
Remember in tax situations the onus is reversed. Proof must be made that the revenue dept. figures are not reliable and the the taxes are not owed.