The Real Cost of Free Sperm: A Lesson to Keep It Home.
We guys get very liberal with our goodies some times, especially in this hobby. Who of us wouldn't cringe at the thought of black-lighting any hotel room. But, would you do this?????
Kansas sues lesbian couple’s sperm donor for child support
TOPEKA, Kan. — A man who donated his sperm to a lesbian couple is now being sued for child support by the Kansas Department of Children and Families.
According to legal filings, in 2009 William Marotta answered an ad on Craigslist posted by Angela Bauer and Jennifer Schreiner, a lesbian couple in Topeka, who were offering $50 per sperm donation.
Marotta, 46, accompanied by his wife, said he met with the couple and agreed to donate to them without accepting the money.
The contract between the couple and Marotta stated that he would be “held harmless for any child support payments demanded of him … regardless of the circumstances.”
“Three years forward, the couple sought state assistance for the child and the Kansas Department of Children and Families sought out of them the name of the father and said they would not provide assistance unless they provide the name,” according to Marotta’s attorney, Ben Swinnen.
The women gave the state Marotta’s name and on Oct. 3, attorney Mark McMillan filed a petition on behalf of the Department of Children and Families that claimed that Marotta was the baby’s father and needed to support her, reported ABC News.
The filing said that the state had spent $189 on the baby from July 2012 to September 2012 and nearly $6,000 in medical assistance, which Marotta had a duty to pay.
The state claimed that the agreement between Marotta and Bauer and Schreiner is invalid because the artificial insemination was not performed by a licensed physician.
Kansas law states that the donor is “treated in law” as if he were not the father if the donation of semen is provided to a licensed physician.
Marotta, who was only told that a baby girl was born of the insemination, has never had any contact with the child since. He has filed a motion to dismiss the case, which is scheduled to be heard on Jan. 8.
why a man can trust a women after that king of action?
The state will never exhaust its funds in pursuing the donor if they choose to do so. Even if the he wins the first time in court, he will have to pay legal fees, probably in the tens of thousands. The women could have been smarter about it and given a false name and a story that the donor had emigrated.
In hindsight, the donor should not have given his name and contact information or gotten legal advice to ensure that the contractual arrangement he was entering would be valid or refused to participate.
The state is, in my opinion, not being unreasonable. If they start recognizing invalid contracts, people will be able to evade responsibility for all sorts of things. The legal system will be unworkable also if illegal contracts are enforced.
After my two Kids were born I had a vasectomy. I am 100% positive I cannot breed any more. I have been with a couple of "nice" ladies who were looking for "Life Partners" after they found out I was sterile they became a bit more distant and moved on.
ebonylover fully booked
Bah tu sais simonpaul faut pas généraliser trop vite...
Originally Posted by simonpaul
As anon_vlad just said it... Those women were not very smart at all at revealing real name of donor guy !
Obviously they were probably pressured/manipulated by some greedy attorneys ... or maybe just stupids lolll
And not all women act like that ... ok I mean most of them. About SPs and hahem trust... It is another story
Not the women but the government that is suing the man.
No good deed goes unpunished.