At least I think it's new as I just noticed it on many profiles on Euphoria's site. Some profiles have no mention of 'Extras', some profiles have 'Extras: No', some profiles have 'Extras: (like CIM, COF, Greek, etc with $ amount for each extra), and some profiles list the extras with the disclaimer "at her discretion". I appreciate Euphoria trying to give us more info recently like tattoos and now extras to make a more informed choice. The thing is I've read reviews in the past of SPs providing some of these extras (like CIM) and now those same SPs have "No" next to the Extras category in their profile. Any insights?
Extras? New category listed on Profiles of Euphoriagirls
- Thread starter Cujo1234
- Start date
Some even have prostate massage, anal, golden shower (any comments Detective?), domination and pegging.
I am a bit surprised as I have had offered (by the SP) paid options with a few who indicate no after options...
Last edited:
Speaking for my self personally I welcome this - the more info the better. Once again personally I would gravitate towards SPs who have more extras so I have more options. I would also agree with the other posters that I have seen Euphoria women who offered extras at no extra charge (I tipped of course) who now indicate no extras. What gives, is this just a money-making strategy?
Like any business, the more you can make charging for smaller services a regular thing, the more you will do it. Perhaps at some point, there will be "Smiling: $50"
I knew of a girl like that, she would charge extra for touching, kissing, 2 positions and other things
Those things work well in strip club but a little less well in FS, she’s not working anymore…I wonder why
Maybe because you were lucky enough to get extras that are not normally offered
Be happy instead of questioning it
I don't work for an agency but I know that girls who work for them get paid a lot less than indies do for a full GFE service, so it makes sense they would charge extras for acronyms that are not part of GFE. I don't understand how charging an extra for anal or cim is unreasonable... When I worked at MP's a few girls offered what many of us charged as extras for free, as a strategy to get repeat clients & regulars. Most of the girls didn't approve of this but I'd never judge anyone for doing this.
What I think isn't fair is a client being blessed by a SP who generously offers something that isn't on the menu for free or as an extra, and revealing it to everyone, which puts pressure on all of us and invites comparisons. This might sound unfair from a client's perspective, but sometimes we may feel more at ease with a specific person and end up making an exception with him. Another possibility is that the client was so insistent and pushy that the SP gave in, so treat what you read online with a grain of salt.
What I think isn't fair is a client being blessed by a SP who generously offers something that isn't on the menu for free or as an extra, and revealing it to everyone, which puts pressure on all of us and invites comparisons. This might sound unfair from a client's perspective, but sometimes we may feel more at ease with a specific person and end up making an exception with him. Another possibility is that the client was so insistent and pushy that the SP gave in, so treat what you read online with a grain of salt.
I think it's great that Euphoria has decided to put the extras on the girls' profiles, everyone should do that, I've always appreciated an agency like Exxxtase for the information they've been putting out for about ten years, Luxury also gives good information.
And yes there are some SP who have extras and there's a "NO" on there files, they just dont want to promote that, it's there right.
And yes there are some SP who have extras and there's a "NO" on there files, they just dont want to promote that, it's there right.
Only an american would think this way.
These are escort agencies and not MPs. In Montreal they operate out in the open, their websites are accessible to anyone, charges are on the websites and the police probably know all the incall locations as well. I wouldn't wprry about my phone, this isn't Boston.
I'd appreciate some guidance on all this. I'm interested in the responses to the way that the agency advertises extras, and it looks like either I think like an American or I don't understand the laws in Quebec ... or I'm being uptight. I've always been very careful not to couple payment with services, not only to be careful around LE but also to show respect for the SP. I still do the envelope-on-the-nightstand routine. It used to be that SPs and agencies advertised "payment is for time only," and I'm old-fashioned and/or careful enough that I find it vaguely distasteful to advertise or ask about any explicit services. It feels "classier" to me not to have a list about how much CIM or greek cost--though I completely respect any SP who does so. But more to the point, my understanding is that it's illegal to "communicate" about paid-for sexual services. So, is it okay to advertise services but not to ask about them? Would SPs be comfortable being asked over email or text if they did XYZ and how much such explicit services cost? I mean no judgment any which way; I simply want to understand the rules of law and etiquette. I admit I'm very careful when I indulge.
I think exactly like you. My understanding of the situation is the following: the owner of this agency is highly experienced and has shown us through his communications here that he is not a fool. Hence, by advertising extras he must be very confident that local law enforcement will continue to exercise their discretionary power in not enforcing certain laws in certain specific circumstances.
I see this as one of two possibilities. First, the person writing the review may of had a one off situation where maybe the SP did something she normally doesn’t do and now instead of continually denying people the request they have it listed in their profile. Second, the SP may have just changed her mind and doesn’t offer the service anymore.
Wonderful addition overall from Euphoria. I personally really like it.
Now that said im kinda wondering on some of the listing as well. I saw Kendall recently and she was more than open to cim and sw on her own (without me asking). She also mentioned Greek was possible. That was only a month ago and as of very recently she got many reviews mentioning cim/sw yet there is a NO for extras on her profile. Did she suddenly changed her mind?
I noticed Forever also list some pseudo extras in some profiles (for most it only mention PSE, but some has the acronymes). I think what made these extras disapear was the infamous C-36 (or was it C-something else, can't recall exactly) but some laws way back i think under Harper that was basically the escort world equivalent of the Covid aka something blown way bigger than it was.
Basically peoples here were going mad thinking it was the end of this business as we knew it, Merb for a while also prohibited services listing (seem to be lift or its not upheld much because i see indies mention them along some agencies) and overall it just created a huge buzz. But did the hobby changed? Nope... There was no difference AT ALL.
You really think LE would raid a place because they now offer extras???? They know these agencies aren't running nursery schools
LE: We know you are running a brothel but Greek and CIMSW is a bridge too far.You really think LE would raid a place because they now offer extras???? They know these agencies aren't running nursery schools
My guess is that they are using abbreviations which can't be used by the police as "proof", even if police officers more than likely know their meaning. That's why people use these abbreviations in the first place...
Fair point. We can say that the open display of extras is confirmation of what we already knew.You really think LE would raid a place because they now offer extras???? They know these agencies aren't running nursery schools
Similar threads
