Montreal Escorts

Charlie Kirk shot dead today

clemieux6

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2012
334
359
63
I mean… for the greater good no?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6314.jpeg
    IMG_6314.jpeg
    55.6 KB · Views: 23

clemieux6

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2012
334
359
63
I dont even wanna debate , just wanna say this someone just got murdered a husband and a father of two young daughters who will grow up without their father and you come out with this snarky stupidity? Wheres your fking humanity? No wonder the world is in the state its in

Maybe I lack empathy for a guy that was advocating pro guns on the cost of kids being killed in schools? So your argument about him having kids I take that with a grain of salt.

Not to mention his lack of sympathy of the woman and children in Palestine.

Alors what happened to him sucks and shouldn’t happen in modern society.

But I wont be losing any sleep tonight.
 

Salbandini

Active Member
May 28, 2025
99
149
33
Maybe I lack empathy for a guy that was advocating pro guns on the cost of kids being killed in schools? So your argument about him having kids I take that with a grain of salt.

Not to mention his lack of sympathy of the woman and children in Palestine.

Alors what happened to him sucks and shouldn’t happen in modern society.

But I wont be losing any sleep tonight.
Well then there you go enough said i could go on tell you things show you things but theres no point … I now know what you represent and the contents of your character good luck
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB14 and Alucard87

urquell

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2013
1,004
2,205
113
Yea but he wanted to protect the second amendment!
It's ironic, because Kirk said that gun control was bad and it was unfortunate but having some gun deaths was necessary to protect the 2nd amendment and individual rights and freedoms. He became a victim in support of his own personal beliefs with the very result he was espousing.
 

Salbandini

Active Member
May 28, 2025
99
149
33
It's ironic, because Kirk said that gun control was bad and it was unfortunate but having some gun deaths was necessary to protect the 2nd amendment and individual rights and freedoms. He became a victim in support of his own personal beliefs with the very result he was espousing.
But it was a professional hit. Theres zero relevance to the second amendment here
 

Valentina Amante

ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ᴀɢᴀɪɴ
Sep 28, 2023
946
2,830
93
Terrebonne
www.valentinaamante.com
You know what really grinds my fuckin gears?

How when it’s a stabbing, no one calls knives “assault knives” and pushes for a worldwide ban on them… but when it’s a gun though UHHHH OHHHHHH :eek: suddenly it’s the weapon’s fault and not the deranged lunatic holding it. ????

Also. When people cheer on someone getting assassinated and killed just because they disagree with their politics or views. That doesn’t make you righteous, it just proves you’re a worthless POS. And of course, the usual clowns on the left are out here celebrating it online - because God forbid they handle dissent with words instead of … bullets ????
They clearly can’t debate. It always resorts to shutting people up, cancelling people and well now killing people. Nice.

Let’s call it what it is: mental illness mixed with cowardice. Anyone who thinks violence is a debate tactic should be dragged to the gallows and publicly executed - and I’d happily grab front row tickets. (Contradictingly hahaha)

FYI: I didn’t like Charlie Kirk but I did agree with some of his points he brought up when he debated idiotic students on campuses. Did I rejoice when I heard the news? No because I’m a normal human being with a brain and half a heart - I’m not some deranged lunatic who thinks violence is a valid response to disagreement.
 

urquell

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2013
1,004
2,205
113
I agreed with some things with him and i disagreed with a lot more. But no matter what he didn't deserved this. Nobody should be killed for political opinions.
It's a nice thought, but people are killed for political reasons all the time, all over the world. Most of the time nobody here says anything or really gives it a second thought. Now that it's closer to home people are giving it more scrutiny. This is not an endorsement of assassination, but people should recongize that when they're dismissing things like this elsewhere that people abroad feel the same way as people are feeling domestically right now, and be more sensitized to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Womaniser

Halloween Mike

The Shape
Apr 19, 2009
5,793
2,551
113
Haddonfield
It's a nice thought, but people are killed for political reasons all the time, all over the world.
Yes but the problem is its seen as "normal" in countries like Russia. I find it as disgusting and condemn it hard too but im unfamilliar with these peoples unlike Kirt wich i ocasionally watched on Youtube.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salbandini

clemieux6

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2012
334
359
63
You know what really grinds my fuckin gears?

How when it’s a stabbing, no one calls knives “assault knives” and pushes for a worldwide ban on them… but when it’s a gun though UHHHH OHHHHHH :eek: suddenly it’s the weapon’s fault and not the deranged lunatic holding it. ????

Also. When people cheer on someone getting assassinated and killed just because they disagree with their politics or views. That doesn’t make you righteous, it just proves you’re a worthless POS. And of course, the usual clowns on the left are out here celebrating it online - because God forbid they handle dissent with words instead of … bullets ????
They clearly can’t debate. It always resorts to shutting people up, cancelling people and well now killing people. Nice.

Let’s call it what it is: mental illness mixed with cowardice. Anyone who thinks violence is a debate tactic should be dragged to the gallows and publicly executed - and I’d happily grab front row tickets. (Contradictingly hahaha)

FYI: I didn’t like Charlie Kirk but I did agree with some of his points he brought up when he debated idiotic students on campuses. Did I rejoice when I heard the news? No because I’m a normal human being with a brain and half a heart - I’m not some deranged lunatic who thinks violence is a valid response to disagreement.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6319.jpeg
    IMG_6319.jpeg
    94.9 KB · Views: 24

Valentina Amante

ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ᴀɢᴀɪɴ
Sep 28, 2023
946
2,830
93
Terrebonne
www.valentinaamante.com
It's a nice thought, but people are killed for political reasons all the time, all over the world. Most of the time nobody here says anything or really gives it a second thought. Now that it's closer to home people are giving it more scrutiny. This is not an endorsement of assassination, but people should recongize that when they're dismissing things like this elsewhere that people abroad feel the same way as people are feeling domestically right now, and be more sensitized to that.

I’m starting to notice a pattern tho lately: these mentally ill progressive liberals love to preach “peace, love, and tolerance” but the second someone disagrees, they drop the mask and start spraying bullets. Nothing says tolerance like trying to kill people who don’t think like you, right?

Their entire mantra is bullshit. They don’t want peace, they want compliance. And when they can’t win with words, they reach for violence. Hypocritical, cowardly, and dangerous.

Wild times we live in.