Is it because the many liberal supporters of King Obama are finally waking up to his naivety and ignorance and finally are embarrassed by their choices ?
How about the Falklands islands, or the Islas Malvinas as referred to by our espagnol speaking friends? These are historically Argentinian territories off its coast and not British. Lady Thatcher is long gone now, replaced by a British version of Obama.
I can go on and on. But , I will stop here. Go ahead, call us we the critics of King Obama 'war mongers'. But If you read history, you will see that it is better to have few militarily conflicts taking place once few years (in order to let steam out -sort of speak) than to have an all blown out World War.
RIP Ronald Reagan. RIP Lady Thatcher. RIP Pope JP II . They defeated the evil Soviet Union. Sadly, King Obama revived it.
Hillary C. in 2016, y'all.
Centaurus, I think you summed it up quite nicely. Teddy Roosevelt had it right when he said, "Walk softly, but carry a big stick". Obama does just the reverse. Talks a bunch but has no balls. The reality is that many of the members here castigated both Daydreamer41 and myself because of our warnings of what was to come. Just like they rebuked my warnings on CF and other misadventures going all the way back to the dog-board. Unfortunately these liberal girlimen like to talk big, but get very quiet when the truth becomes apparent (or they just keep changing the subject). Obama has three more years to really screw things up. Look what he's done in just 5 years.
Merlot, to say this is a merely Russian Historical issue is a cop-out. Had the U.S. continued to follow the Reagan Ideals the Eastern Bloc Countries would have looked completely different by now. You keep blabbering that pablum right into a new "Cold War".
Rand Paul in '16!!!!
This will be my only post on this subject as I don't intend on wasting more time with those that will never learn.




