The rest of the world and Latin America will not have this problem because he doesn't stand a chance in hell in winning, his own party can't even stand him, you take away three words from his vocabulary(Mexicans, Wall, Muslims) and a whole lot less people would pay attention to him, he is a good troll though, I will give him that, I'm hearing that it could be a Clinton, Eiizabeth Warren White House which would be the first female President/VP in U.S history.:thumb:
Trumped
- Thread starter cloudsurf
- Start date
- Status
The rest of the world and Latin America will not have this problem because he doesn't stand a chance in hell in winning, his own party can't even stand him, you take away three words from his vocabulary(Mexicans, Wall, Muslims) and a whole lot less people would pay attention to him, he is a good troll though, I will give him that, I'm hearing that it could be a Clinton, Eiizabeth Warren White House which would be the first female President/VP in U.S history.:thumb:
The people saying that there is no way in hell that the Donald could be elected president are the same ones who 6 months ago were saying that he would never become the Republican nominee.
The elections are 6 months away.....a lot of shit can happen till then.
The elections are 6 months away.....a lot of shit can happen till then.
This isn't actually correct. 6 months ago, it was Republicans denying the possibility of a successful Trump candidacy. Democrats then, and Democrats now, while revolted by pretty much everything Trump "stands" for (if that phrase even has meaning when applied to him), have long relished the idea of either a Trump or a Cruz nomination.
You are correct in saying that a lot can happen between now and then. But in 2012 the Repubkicans were consistently also denying the validity of poll after poll showing Romney, a much more palatable candidate to the general electorate than Trump, getting beaten handily by Obama. Remember, it is the Republican party that is the anti-science, anti-rationalism party, choosing to believe the earth is 6000 years old; that climate-change, if happening at all, isn't man-made; that homosexuality can be "cured;" that voter fraud is widespread and needs correcting via voter ID laws, etc. etc.
Clinton has her baggage - what public official with 20 years under intense scrutiny doesn't? - and you can believe what you want, but my money is on a catastrophic GOP loss.
Clinton will win because of simple mathematics:
Blacks & Hispanics together make up about 30% of the US Population. This group will overwhelmingly support Clinton over Trump.
Of the 65% of the US population which is white, half are women, who will predominantly support Clinton over Trump.
50% of the US population consider themselves Democrat or Democrat-leaning, while only 40% consider themselves Republican or Republican-leaning.
Add up the numbers and it win be a landslide victory for Clinton!
Blacks & Hispanics together make up about 30% of the US Population. This group will overwhelmingly support Clinton over Trump.
Of the 65% of the US population which is white, half are women, who will predominantly support Clinton over Trump.
50% of the US population consider themselves Democrat or Democrat-leaning, while only 40% consider themselves Republican or Republican-leaning.
Add up the numbers and it win be a landslide victory for Clinton!
There is nothing wrong with Ted Cruz. He's an honorable guy who believes the Constitution can be saved despite the Far Far Left Nutjobs like Hillary, Barry and Bernie.
Another point to consider: there are 19 states, plus DC, that have gone into the Democratic column in every one of the last 6 presidential elections (1992-2012). Those 19 states/DC represent 242 electoral votes. A candidate needs 270 to win. If Clinton takes, say, Florida in addition to those reliably Democratic regions, she wins. And that's just one scenario.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...-republican-electoral-map-20160502-story.html
Yes, and when Trump is president, he will nominate the "honorable" Mr. Cruz to the Supreme Court. :boom:
This election is not going to be a normal election. Both parties have severely flawed and injured candidates. Hillary may not make it to the finish because of her legal problems. Trump is very unpredictable. He has that non-criminal Fraud case which can hurt his brand. So who knows what's going to happen with this election. And then there's all of those angry Americans who love Trump and the others who hate Trump. Hillary has more haters than admirers. The odds makers are not going to have an easy time with this one.
It is the same in Canada, the voting line is at the Manitoba and Saskatchewan border.
I doubt Trump would nominate Ted Cruz and I don't think Cruz would want to be a Supreme Court Justice at this point.
But Cruz is an honorable person, despite your slated, much biased views.
Trump does not beleive in the supreme court, he will abolish it
Perhaps. I am surprised Barry didn't kick off the Conservative members by Executive Order (his pen and his phone).
I'd be clinging to this type of thinking too, if I were a Trumpeter. But I wouldn't bet the farm on HRC's "legal problems" derailing her. The GOP have been after her for 20 years and, well, here we are...
Admittedly, my post was a bit tongue-in-cheek. Cruz' lapdog Mike Lee (R-UT) has been floated out there more frequently as a possibility from the right. But these are all moot points. Scalia's replacement will either be Garland or someone rather farther to the left. Frankly, at this point I'd love to see Obama withdraw Garland's name tomorrow and let Hilary nominate someone. Wouldn't that burn McConnell's ass?
And, as far as my "much biased views"... well, yes, they are much biased, I may even say, very much biased. But are you contrasting them to your own, scrupulously neutral ones?
Hillary has really broken the law, Mr. Yikezz from New England (hmm). Look up US Title 18 Section 793(f). It's all in black and white and it fits what she did which was expose Top Secret and other classified information by putting her email account on an unsecured server. And there are documented hackers. One is in the US right now serving time.
So, yikezz, unless Barry's Cronies at the Unjustice Department block her prosecution, I wouldn't bet your Condo in Montreal on her not being convicted.
BTW, I am not a Trumpster (or Trump Chump) as they are called. But I do despise Hillary and her ilk.
But guys tell me how the most powerful country in the world, with the most generous population in the world (the americans are by far the biggest donor in the world, it's in their blood to give back)... so I was saying, how could the united state end up with these 2 final candidate for the presidency? What the fuck is the problem to end up with someone who broke the law and someone who once cut electricity and infested one of his own building to get the tenants to leave it... It's beyond me...
Who the hell know what repubs/conservatives are going on about anymore... They live in their own self-sustaining media bubble, completely disconnected from any form of objective reality. There have been endless congressional investigations (run by republicans no less) into Solyndra, Fast & Furious, Benghazi, Emailgate bla bla bla... when you look at the results, even those swearing to "UNCOVER THE TRUTH" have come up with SWEET FUCK ALL.... Why? The obvious reason is that because all these scandals are figments of their imaginations... The reasons they give? George Soros an the vast left-wing conspiracy. I call shenanigans. If you have evidence of a crime bring it forward. Press charges and go to court. Short of that, all you have is innuendo and bullshit... Poo-flingers, the lot of you... YOU HAVE JUST NOMINATED DONALD TRUMP TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT!!! WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU???? SERIOUSLY????
Most people would take a moment to look in the mirror and reflect for a minute...
Most people would take a moment to look in the mirror and reflect for a minute...
- Status
Similar threads
