At least I think it's new as I just noticed it on many profiles on Euphoria's site. Some profiles have no mention of 'Extras', some profiles have 'Extras: No', some profiles have 'Extras: (like CIM, COF, Greek, etc with $ amount for each extra), and some profiles list the extras with the disclaimer "at her discretion". I appreciate Euphoria trying to give us more info recently like tattoos and now extras to make a more informed choice. The thing is I've read reviews in the past of SPs providing some of these extras (like CIM) and now those same SPs have "No" next to the Extras category in their profile. Any insights?
Extras? New category listed on Profiles of Euphoriagirls
- Thread starter Cujo1234
- Start date
Some even have prostate massage, anal, golden shower (any comments Detective?), domination and pegging.
I am a bit surprised as I have had offered (by the SP) paid options with a few who indicate no after options...
Last edited:
Speaking for my self personally I welcome this - the more info the better. Once again personally I would gravitate towards SPs who have more extras so I have more options. I would also agree with the other posters that I have seen Euphoria women who offered extras at no extra charge (I tipped of course) who now indicate no extras. What gives, is this just a money-making strategy?
I knew of a girl like that, she would charge extra for touching, kissing, 2 positions and other things
Those things work well in strip club but a little less well in FS, she’s not working anymore…I wonder why
Maybe because you were lucky enough to get extras that are not normally offered
Be happy instead of questioning it
I don't work for an agency but I know that girls who work for them get paid a lot less than indies do for a full GFE service, so it makes sense they would charge extras for acronyms that are not part of GFE. I don't understand how charging an extra for anal or cim is unreasonable... When I worked at MP's a few girls offered what many of us charged as extras for free, as a strategy to get repeat clients & regulars. Most of the girls didn't approve of this but I'd never judge anyone for doing this.
What I think isn't fair is a client being blessed by a SP who generously offers something that isn't on the menu for free or as an extra, and revealing it to everyone, which puts pressure on all of us and invites comparisons. This might sound unfair from a client's perspective, but sometimes we may feel more at ease with a specific person and end up making an exception with him. Another possibility is that the client was so insistent and pushy that the SP gave in, so treat what you read online with a grain of salt.
What I think isn't fair is a client being blessed by a SP who generously offers something that isn't on the menu for free or as an extra, and revealing it to everyone, which puts pressure on all of us and invites comparisons. This might sound unfair from a client's perspective, but sometimes we may feel more at ease with a specific person and end up making an exception with him. Another possibility is that the client was so insistent and pushy that the SP gave in, so treat what you read online with a grain of salt.
I think it's great that Euphoria has decided to put the extras on the girls' profiles, everyone should do that, I've always appreciated an agency like Exxxtase for the information they've been putting out for about ten years, Luxury also gives good information.
And yes there are some SP who have extras and there's a "NO" on there files, they just dont want to promote that, it's there right.
And yes there are some SP who have extras and there's a "NO" on there files, they just dont want to promote that, it's there right.
This is sketchy to list. Directly tying payment to explicit services.
Would not want police to get hands on texts in which you are requesting specific sexual services in exchange for cash. Agencies are getting too bold.
Would not want police to get hands on texts in which you are requesting specific sexual services in exchange for cash. Agencies are getting too bold.
These are escort agencies and not MPs. In Montreal they operate out in the open, their websites are accessible to anyone, charges are on the websites and the police probably know all the incall locations as well. I wouldn't wprry about my phone, this isn't Boston.
Similar threads
