Safety of providers on Onlyfans
- Thread starter pilotman1
- Start date
Just providers making contents for publicity. Sometimes it's their partner, sometimes it's pornstar, I doubt it's a random John found when ordering a pizza lol
I believe those who do, are often just having the same partner. Are in poly relationships. Or have small groups of trusted colleagues that they trust to be as conscious about their safty outside of the filming being done.
To each their own.
Besides... they're useing condoms when seeing you. It's their choice who they choose not to use one with in their personal life.
How does that make it safe for clients is the question you should be asking.
An STI test is only as good as the last time you had sex and the incubation period of whatever they may or may not have.
I doubt they would abstain from sex for weeks and months to make their test results worth anything that is if they have any recent tests at all.
We all know that condoms don’t protect you from all STI so let’s not play games here and no they are not all in poly relationships either.
If you say that it is a risk that you either take or not is the real truth we can all live with that, but let’s not try to pull the wool over each others eyes.
Last edited:
Actually yes some do only fans videos with random “johns” or “tricks” if he has the physique they like so it is risky as @Fradi and @pilotman1 correctly pointed out
I didn't say they were all in poly relationships I gave 3 possible options out of many.
I don't know who is being refered to or how many partners they've had on screen.
As for those STIs that condoms don't protect against... we are all f*cked there then as if you think about it on this forum we are all in eachothers bed in one way or another. If not directly, you're only 1-2 places removed from the next person. You're all sharing the same providers. Unless you can guarantee your ATF hasn't and won't have been with anyone else here on MERB.
Refering to your discomfort about the STIs that aren't protected against by condoms, you pose the same risk by every person you ever fornicate with.
I might still choose to go with a provider I know who takes regular tests and plays safe otherwise.
And while you're busy calling BS, myself it isn't something I have done on online cam. But when I do, yes others will have condoms on, but when it is Master in the video, no there won't be. He's my BF, life partner, I wear condoms with others to keep myself protected for him. Why would that change because there is a camera filming?
Actually my suggestion of the small groups who trust eachother and create content like that who share, switch, and group play, is often the more realistic situation in the porn industry.
I've known people back in the 2000s in amature porn who would refuse the male models and only make content with their relationship partner. There are for sure still people these days who would do the same especially now that they dont have to enforce their choice against the wishes of a production company.
It still stands that it is their choice who they film with, and what precautions they take for the sake of their health. While you are calling them out on what they do openly without hiding it. Do you realize that clients do whatever they want any given day, without being held acoutable for regular testing, and we are unaware of who and what they do in their private business. I would then say you the client in your secrecy is still more risky than someone you see openly showing you on screen who they have been with, while they have taken regular test before and will continue to do after these filming moments.
And don't tell me about if they test. This is Canada, not the United States, we have access to and get tests done either for free and wait for results, or pay and get them ASAP. High end is even more likely to be paying for the ASAP tests. But test can be done free here. There's no reason except purposeful neglect to avoid being tested.
I don't speak for people doing just anyone unprotected. I get where there's discomfort if that is the impression recieved. But if it bothers you, be happy they share that fact, and make your own choice to stay away.
I don't know who is being refered to or how many partners they've had on screen.
As for those STIs that condoms don't protect against... we are all f*cked there then as if you think about it on this forum we are all in eachothers bed in one way or another. If not directly, you're only 1-2 places removed from the next person. You're all sharing the same providers. Unless you can guarantee your ATF hasn't and won't have been with anyone else here on MERB.
Refering to your discomfort about the STIs that aren't protected against by condoms, you pose the same risk by every person you ever fornicate with.
I might still choose to go with a provider I know who takes regular tests and plays safe otherwise.
And while you're busy calling BS, myself it isn't something I have done on online cam. But when I do, yes others will have condoms on, but when it is Master in the video, no there won't be. He's my BF, life partner, I wear condoms with others to keep myself protected for him. Why would that change because there is a camera filming?
Actually my suggestion of the small groups who trust eachother and create content like that who share, switch, and group play, is often the more realistic situation in the porn industry.
I've known people back in the 2000s in amature porn who would refuse the male models and only make content with their relationship partner. There are for sure still people these days who would do the same especially now that they dont have to enforce their choice against the wishes of a production company.
It still stands that it is their choice who they film with, and what precautions they take for the sake of their health. While you are calling them out on what they do openly without hiding it. Do you realize that clients do whatever they want any given day, without being held acoutable for regular testing, and we are unaware of who and what they do in their private business. I would then say you the client in your secrecy is still more risky than someone you see openly showing you on screen who they have been with, while they have taken regular test before and will continue to do after these filming moments.
And don't tell me about if they test. This is Canada, not the United States, we have access to and get tests done either for free and wait for results, or pay and get them ASAP. High end is even more likely to be paying for the ASAP tests. But test can be done free here. There's no reason except purposeful neglect to avoid being tested.
I don't speak for people doing just anyone unprotected. I get where there's discomfort if that is the impression recieved. But if it bothers you, be happy they share that fact, and make your own choice to stay away.
Last edited:
This is a much more realistic answer.
I agree that people in the porn industry and most escorts that I know take more health precautions than civi women or someone you would pick up at a bar.
That however is kind of equalized by the amount of sex and different partners they have so they are not any less risky and yes we are all in the same game and share the risks which are real but luckily now the majority are curable and condoms do protect well against HIV which also is no longer a death sentence.
Testing is great and yes again I agree that many escorts get tested regularly but that is only really good to know if you have something, but does not exempt you from not having anything the first day you have sex after your test or even before if it is before that particular STI incubation period.
We should all be aware of the risks and not try to down play them because we want to protect our colleagues.
Nobody should be naive enough that escorts don’t have unprotected sex either with their partners boyfriends, girlfriends the same as clients do.
Luckily every escort I know does use condoms when seeing clients for fs which carries the greatest risk.
I never said clients aren’t risky they are more risky probably than escorts but this thread wasn’t about clients it was about providers.
Last edited:
