Euphoria agency in the news

LC18 · Oct 12, 2026

Their man concern has always been minors, most of their effective is working on bringing down minor trafficking. When they can, they investigate legit places like agencies and spas which is why you were under the impression that those places were intouchable.

They’re just not hiring minors so their at the very bottom of that team’s list

With 15 new people, an investigation on national tv and a few news articles, they’ll move a little quicker. If they don’t, the public eye will be very harsh and lose trust

The public eye in this case is Monsieur madame tout le monde who’s never been an escort or hired one. All they know about the industry, they’ve learned it last Thursday while watching Enquête

Glyscore · Oct 12, 2026

Is there a chance that they get acces to the Whatsapp data base of these agencies and trace back client numbers and directly arrest them?

Halloween Mike · Oct 12, 2026

Lunaseraphim said:
Honestly I don't know anybody who is talking about this except people who are in the industry. Literally, no one cares. Nobody watches TV anymore. No family member or friend contacted me to discuss this.

I seen Reddit threads about it. Peoples are definately talking and TLMEP is a huge show. If Enquete was not enough, this is certainly it.

Don't forget that "activism" is a huge trend these days for better or for worst. We live in a world of "influencers" and any person can say anything online. Be it true or not.

Simple minds are easily manipulated.

Halloween Mike · Oct 12, 2026

Glyscore said:
Is there a chance that they get acces to the Whatsapp data base of these agencies and trace back client numbers and directly arrest them?

This would mean A LOT of work for very small results. Have you ever heard of a drug bust not involving actual drug trafficking? I mean i never seen the police track downs clients who bough a bag of coke 6 months ago.

The "fardeau de la preuve" wouldn't stand in court.

But could this mean more stings operation? That is possible.

marcandre13 · Oct 12, 2026

Lunaseraphim said:
Je comprends, mais ce n'est pas tout le monde qui pense comme toi. J'ai eu beaucoup de clients qui m'ont parlé de leurs questionnements par rapport à l'industrie, dont plusieurs personnes qui ne voulaient plus fréquenter les agences.. Je ne vois presque plus de clients qui ne sont pas sur Merb. Il y a un désillusionnement général par rapport à tout ça que je ressens en ce moment. Ça fait que beaucoup d'anciens clients ne voient qu'une ou deux escortes. Ou les clients qui ne veulent pas faire de screening vont dans les salons..

Ah, et c'est tout à fait normal. Ca bouille à Montréal présentement. Je ne peux pas comprendre ce qui se passe sur le terrain. Ici, à Québec, c'est une situation bien différente. Mais ca reste que je vois toujours la même courtisane question de sécurité et de questionnement justement

Est-ce que les prix peuvent avoir un lien aussi? Ce n'est pas impossible. Après, c'est toujours une question personnelle. Je comprends que le problème semble venir du INCALL alors que j'ai toujours pensé que le OUTCALL était plus dangereux. Mais, effectivement, si je serais à montréal en ce moment, je laisserais les choses retomber avant de voir une courtisane autant en salon que agence.
Bien à toi très chere

marcandre13 · Oct 12, 2026

Glyscore said:
Is there a chance that they get acces to the Whatsapp data base of these agencies and trace back client numbers and directly arrest them?

Arrest you for what? There have no proofs you had sexual activities. Some people booked girls for talking or cuddling only. Everyone needs are different.They have nothing against you. You can chill my friend

jmioffe · Oct 12, 2026

Kind of surprised there's so much being made of this when the Epstein files remained sealed but maybe that's too American a perspective?

Johnny test · Oct 12, 2026

Il faut aussi faire la différence entre les "preuves médiatiques" et celles admissibles par une cour, pour l'instant il y un grand déballement de "révélations" pas vraiment nouvelles d'ailleurs, est ce que ça peut mener à des arrestations? Peut être, mais il faudrait que les preuves et les accusations soient solides et comme disait @LC18 le trafic des mineurs reste la priorité première. Accessoirement la prostitution est aussi vieille que l'humanité et ce n'est pas en supprimant les agances qu'elle disparaitra. Je parle à travers mon chapeau mais j'imaginerai que les autorités préfèrent une activité, certes illégale mais relativement facile à surveiller sur le web, que le retour vers des réseaux souterrains totalement controlés par le crime organisé.
La suite des évènements va surtout dépendre de l'influence de l'opinion suite aux différents reportages et, pour l'instant on n'en sait pas grand chose.

megakev · Oct 12, 2026

Glyscore said:
Is there a chance that they get acces to the Whatsapp data base of these agencies and trace back client numbers and directly arrest them?

If it turns out these agencies employed many underage girls, then yeah, it could happen. Otherwise, they'll go after the owners.

kevinsmith · Oct 12, 2026

jmioffe said:
Kind of surprised there's so much being made of this when the Epstein files remained sealed but maybe that's too American a perspective?

Yes it is.

TheJames101 · Oct 12, 2026

Probably worth reposting for those who have not watched yesterday's Tout le Monde En Parle segment:

Enquête sur l’exploitation sexuelle dans les agences d’escorte de luxe

Le journaliste Romain Schué parle de son reportage à l'émission Enquête en compagnie de Clémentine.

ici.radio-canada.ca

It's a shame that the voices are so limited - someone with recent relevant experience, like @Ariel18 (Victoria) would be a valuable voice to add to a segment like that (not saying she'd want to, obviously, but someone in a similar position). This whole thing is completely lacking any nuance whatsoever - but that's common these days.

kkrack · Oct 12, 2026

Haha they're all going down. I guess they can move certain volumes of money but past a certain limit they become a problem. In this kind of business better be discreet.

Halloween Mike · Oct 12, 2026

marcandre13 said:
Je comprends que le problème semble venir du INCALL alors que j'ai toujours pensé que le OUTCALL était plus dangereux.

For clients or providers? Honestly i think both have their + and their - in term of security. Also depend on the location. An outcall in a classy hotel seem more secure than at a private residence or a motel. At least at first glance. For a client hosting in a hotel also seem more secure than going at an incall location. But if an SP suddenly lost it (because intoxicated or whatever) it can kill the discreet side. The risks are never 0 in any scenarios imo but the consensus was that major agencies were safe for both clients and providers. Now if agencies for whatever reasons didn't do enough for the providers, its on them. As a client tough i knew if i was going to Euphoria's place that i wouldn't be robbed, assaulted etc.

I know some will laugh at this, and maybe it is irrealistic, but before i became "used to how it work" my tought was always that there was a guy nearby to make sure things would be smooth. Either in another unit beside, just outside close, maybe even in the corridor. Or when it comes to outcall someone would stay in the car nearby. I also expected a "panic button" as April Rose talked about in her text. Obviously my nature would always be to respect the SPs so its irrelevant to ME specifically, but i expected that there would be bad clients and SPs had to be safe. I was surprised at first it was not the case. But then i learned about the financial aspect it would cost (imagine one driver per escort outcall, the cost would be a lot more because nobody would wait an hour for a 20...) and i learned that such incidents were indeed rare.

Indies now have decided to use more the "information route" (trough screening) rather than actual muscle on location if something bad happened on the spot. It can obviously be a deterrent because you know if you screw up, you would face severe consequences. But this mean there is always some kind of risk if someone snap or such.

What im trying to say is the risk is never zero, but there is ways to dismish it.

felixLg · Oct 12, 2026

marcandre13 said:
Arrest you for what? There have no proofs you had sexual activities. Some people booked girls for talking or cuddling only. Everyone needs are different.They have nothing against you. You can chill my friend

No need for sexual activities, just soliciting, just a text on your phone to a provider, could bring you to court. Even asking for a dance in the booth if their is agreement for contact is an offence

marcandre13 · Oct 12, 2026

Halloween Mike said:
For clients or providers? Honestly i think both have their + and their - in term of security. Also depend on the location. An outcall in a classy hotel seem more secure than at a private residence or a motel. At least at first glance. For a client hosting in a hotel also seem more secure than going at an incall location. But if an SP suddenly lost it (because intoxicated or whatever) it can kill the discreet side. The risks are never 0 in any scenarios imo but the consensus was that major agencies were safe for both clients and providers. Now if agencies for whatever reasons didn't do enough for the providers, its on them. As a client tough i knew if i was going to Euphoria's place that i wouldn't be robbed, assaulted etc.

I know some will laugh at this, and maybe it is irrealistic, but before i became "used to how it work" my tought was always that there was a guy nearby to make sure things would be smooth. Either in another unit beside, just outside close, maybe even in the corridor. Or when it comes to outcall someone would stay in the car nearby. I also expected a "panic button" as April Rose talked about in her text. Obviously my nature would always be to respect the SPs so its irrelevant to ME specifically, but i expected that there would be bad clients and SPs had to be safe. I was surprised at first it was not the case. But then i learned about the financial aspect it would cost (imagine one driver per escort outcall, the cost would be a lot more because nobody would wait an hour for a 20...) and i learned that such incidents were indeed rare.

Indies now have decided to use more the "information route" (trough screening) rather than actual muscle on location if something bad happened on the spot. It can obviously be a deterrent because you know if you screw up, you would face severe consequences. But this mean there is always some kind of risk if someone snap or such.

What im trying to say is the risk is never zero, but there is ways to dismish it.

Oh I was talking OUTCALL at home as if I was hosting a girl at my private home. But Incall or Outcall at a hotel is the same thing No???
Of course the risk is never 0 but I always see the girl at her place because I feels she Will be more comfortable. I always thought Incall was the better secure option for her. The screening method is s good tool, no doubt about that!

marcandre13 · Oct 12, 2026

felixLg said:
No need for sexual activities, just soliciting, just a text on your phone to a provider, could bring you to court. Even asking for a dance in the booth if their is agreement for contact is an offence

If they ever do that, cities will shut down

LC18 · Oct 12, 2026

Police officers would arrest you if they see you giving money to a sex worker. If they walk on you having sex with a sex worker.

They won’t arrest you if you walk in their incall but they can interrogate you, ask you to follow them to the police station which will draw attention on you

Unless the agency they’re investigating was hiring minor and they want to see who has hired those said minors, they’re not going to run the numbers to see who they belong to. Ils ont d’autres chats à fouetter

Halloween Mike · Oct 12, 2026

felixLg said:
No need for sexual activities, just soliciting, just a text on your phone to a provider, could bring you to court. Even asking for a dance in the booth if their is agreement for contact is an offence

This would make no sense, as technically a massage is touching too, yet its not illegal.

marcandre13 said:
Oh I was talking OUTCALL at home as if I was hosting a girl at my private home. But Incall or Outcall at a hotel is the same thing No???

Outcall at your home is indeed less secure for the SP as she has no idea where she is going and whats gonna be on location. As for the client, well hosting at your home could also bring its issues as if you have items of values you can get "spotted"for robbery later, or even blackmail as the SP now have your adress and it would be easy to find who you are. That said it would need to be a dishonnest SP and just like bad clients i believe this is the very minority...

Mod21 · Oct 12, 2026

Folks,

There is much to be discussed about current events, and their implications for the local industry. The moderation team is happy to let that conversation continue and plans to intervene in it as little as possible - if at all.

There is an exception to this:

What the moderation team will not tolerate is for this thread - or any other thread on the Forum - to be used to spread rumours, especially when those rumours are being spread by industry insiders. Those to whom this last comment applies have been notified privately already.

Anybody who tries to take advantage of the situation to stir shit on the board will be immediately and permanently suspended.

This the only warning the membership - and that includes advertisers - gets about this. So, please heed the warning.

Thanks for your collaboration.

Johnny test · Oct 12, 2026

Damn we have 22 pages of rumours out of 30 it's gonna be hard to clean.....(it's a joke, for those who don't get it)

Euphoria agency in the news

Red banner whore

Well-Known Member

The Shape

The Shape

Active Member

Active Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

The Shape

Active Member

Active Member

Active Member

Red banner whore

The Shape

Well-Known Member

Similar threads