Search results

If it was all about bad ratings then Trump should be fired too. His ratings are in the toilet as well. lol. Everybody's ratings are in the toilet. You'd struggle to find a single nationally prominent politician who has a positive net approval. If we were talking about a private company instead...

That would be the way to go, yes.

No, they may even be a bit low. The smallest room (alcove rooms) run roughly $475-500 per night. The duo massage is $310 plus tax and tips, so call it $400 (I was a bit high on the massage). The only one that seems like a wild card to me is dinner. I'm assuming drinks, dinner wine, and...

Kimmel was on tv, Trump was on TV, Reagan was an actor in chimpanzee movies. You don't have to be a lawyer or a politician to be president, or an expert at anything to be a politician, or if you are a politician be expert at whatever you're put in charge of. I used RFK as an example as someone...

Sorry to hear that and you have my sympathies. Privacy is important and it sucks when you don't know what a stranger will do with your personal info.

it's all so funny. No matter what anyone thinks if Trump, pro or con, nobody is going to be able to say that his presidency hasn't been consequential. The precedents are all being set here, and all the checks and balances are being tested and stretched to their limits. Barring legislative...

I figured 5-6, so let's assume 5hrs. I was thnking looks lovely but probably only a fantasy date for most. If the couples massage is $200 per person plus tx plus tips, call it $500 for a round figure, and the hotel room is $500/night (online price round figure) and dinner is $300-ish(is that...

out of curiousity, when you are creating these social date packages how long a date are you envisaging? I compliment you on your creative vision, incidentally. Some of these packages you're creating are very unique and imaginative.

If we got rid of everybody who wasn't qualified for their job in politics, from the President right on down to state level, on both sides of the aisle, then there wouldn't be anybody left. Some people are just obviously less qualified than others. *cough* RFK *cough*

*phew* MERB flew under the radar. :) I had no particular wish to see Charlie Kirk or any other politician (if he can be called a politician) dead, but I honestly I don't give a fuck that he is. If the whole fucking bunch of them fell dead tomorrow I wouldn't give a shit about them...

If the plural of moose is moose is the plural of mousse also mousse?

glad to hear it! heal quickly and well. :)

Sorry to hear you were in an accident, and hope you're ok with no lasting effects. OMG! You didn't injure your mouth or tongue did you? GASP! :)

I think that's what pretty much everybody has been saying all along. Everyone agrees on that point and the discussion is more about whatever each person is personally comfortable with and why. I don't think anyone has been gainsaying anybody's right to choose for themselves, on either side of...

You're not entirely wrong, and yes it's hypocritical to absolve one weapon and not the other. Having said that, there's practical reasons to address guns first. The most important is that guns is a bigger problem. Gun deaths represent 13.7 deaths per 100K and stabbing deaths represent 0.53...

I admire your optimism! :)

Yep, that's pretty much what I think too. That's also why I don't usually post here in the politics forum. After a certain point you realize that you come looking for one thing and end up just banging your head against the wall trying to communicate with those who have no wish whatsoever to...

Actually, pretty much everything all of you guys said is true, and thanks for chiming in. I wasn't really homing in on what's wrong with the political system though, because there's too much and it would take years for any of us to even get partway through it. I was more kind of referring to...

You are a centrist. It's not that hard to define. :) Good for you for being able to look at all sides and see the merits of each

The silence here over two days speaks volumes. So, if we take silence as assent to the premise that nobody's mind is ever going to be changed in a forum like this one, then is there any point to having this or any other forum for political discussion? Or is the point simply to have a place to...