Search results

I posted an example of it earlier in the thread. All the white guys who didn't get scholarship offers for the 30 years John Thompson coached Georgetown and recruited exclusively black players in order to promote opportunities for them, but not white guys. Post 205 FYI

What, you have no Native American/Indigenous friend?:mad:

Do you have any clue how many other threads are already started on this topic? Do we really need another?

Unfortunately, QB injuries are hitting: Watson, torn achilles, likely out for this season and next: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/41906271/browns-deshaun-watson-carted-noncontact-leg-injury Daniels, rib injury, out...

Some years ago, there was a lot of criticism directed at Georgetown basketball coach John Thompson, who was an immensely successful NCAA basketball coach who won an NCAA championship, for not recruiting any white guys at all. His teams were generally 100% black, while most other teams had, at...

No. It's just a lot of ruminations that will not change anything for anyone.

In your example, yes, it is. But in my example, there is no advertising. And no discriminatory intention.

Snakejack, if it was that simple they would figure it all out very quickly. Hezbollah/Iran has been trying to assassinate Netanyahu, who is supposedly holed up in a billionaire friend's atomic shelter. They sent a drone at Netanyahu's house, but blew up another one next door, and Netanyahu...

Yes, motivation does matter, and in the example I gave to you where facts are at hand, there is no discriminatory intent. The Constitution’s protection of racial and religious groups is organized around the concept of discriminatory intent. I realize you have not studied US federal...

New_in_town, I think everyone understands and sympathizes with your frustration at the kind of filtering discussed in your post. But the questions I would ask you are (1) what do you propose to do about it? (The answer is absolutely nothing as far as I can see), and (2) do you really want to...

Indeed, a Gaza civilian has reported to the BBC that Sinwar was killed in his house, and Sinwar was not his invited guest: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2yvw97egdo.amp "He said he had no idea why Sinwar was there or how he got there. "Never ever did me and my brothers and sons have...

The Panarin-Shesterkin Show will be in Montreal Tuesday night. You guys shouldn't miss it. The Rangers have won 3 straight road games to begin a season for the first time in 92 years; 4 straight would be a new team record. Hasn't been done. In addition, LaFreniere has points in each of the...

You called it- Rangers raked the Leafs 4-1- Panarin an empty net goal and Shesterkin 35 saves, .971% showing the Leafs who is boss in the Eastern Conference. Rangers with 2 empty net goals in the last minute as the Leafs were unable to cover home ice and instead were raked off of it.

There is and was a cabal. She was suddenly the candidate put forth for nomination, by a process nobody saw. Or read about. One day we were reading that one of Newsome, Whitmer or Shapiro would be the likely nominee. The next day, all of a sudden, it was Harris and nobody else. What happened...

I have now programmed my computer using AI to make all of your French posts appear on my screen in a King's English, so that I can now respond. The answer to the above is Patrik Laine, once he gets healthy, so you will need to be patient and wait until he gets healthy.

We are discussing the process by which she was put up for nomination, and not other worthier Democrats. She did not go through the primaries. She was allowed to bypass them, by the cabal/group who put her up for nomination.

She weighed more like 95-100 pounds- small and petite

But you're not apparently understanding the application of the definition. There is no discrimination or prejudice based on race when persons are excluded solely based on privacy or discretion factors. You cited a definition. The important part is applying it to the facts at hand.

That's the whole point, it was ostensibly done on behalf of the party, but by who, and with what authority?

No it's not. It's exclusion based on privacy/discretion reasons. The intent is to not be recognized and outed, not to restrict service based on race.