Search results

There's also a sense of purpose and unity. Reminds me of the 2008 democratic presidential campaign.

Angry much? The only people gaslighting and lying to you are trump, MAGA Republicans, and right-wing media. You, and others, have been calling Biden senile and demented. He is not. He is old and showing his age, but he is not senile.

Sorry about your brother's health. However you are in no position to apply that diagnosis to Biden. Can we please move on from Biden since he is no longer running for re-election.

Biden correctly stepped away. Now it's time for trump to do the same, but we all know he never will.

Biden is not the candidate so I'm not sure why you are speculating about his health. Dementia is a serious medical condition, and that diagnosis should not be thrown around lightly.

Yes, really. A diagnosis of senility (dementia) requires an evaluation by a physician, usually a neurologist, after a series of neuropsych tests and examinations. Biden has had no such workup or diagnosis. He's just old. It happens to all of us if we are fortunate to live long enough.

First, Biden is old, and showing his age, but he is not senile. Second, the old republican party of Reagan and Bush no longer exists. It is now the white christian nationalists MAGA party taken over by trump and trumpism. Eventually trump will be gone, but MAGA/trumpism will continue and for a...

It's common practice not to hold a primary when a sitting president is running for re-election. Since Biden has withdrawn so close to the November election, it's too late to organize 50 state primary elections. Harris, or someone else, will be nominated at the Democratic convention in August...

Harris has plenty if time to show the electorate she is a far better candidate, and a far better person, that the convicted felon she is running against.

As interesting as your war stories may be, I think we are getting a little off topic. Can we refocus on the 2024 presidential campaigns?

There's lawyers representing both sides who are trying to select jurors who may be more favorable to their arguments. Jurors who are selected take an oath to faithly follow the evidence and the law. The jury system, while not perfect, gets it right most of the time.

Clearly you don't know how the jury system works in the USA including in NY and Cali. It's not the defendant's political affiliation that's on trial, it's their alleged illegal conduct.

I've heard this argument before so obviously it was reported by the media. It was entered as evidence by the defendant at trial, so it was heard by the jury too. It didn't matter. It was still fraud.

To suggest that trial by jury of your peers anywhere in the USA is like the preordained show trials in an authoritarian state like Russia is ridiculous.

Because of the fraud trump was able to borrow more money at a lower rate and get more favorable premiums from insurers. So do you really think that this fraud is insignificant? The jury consisted of ordinary citizens selected by both the plaintiff and the defendant. The jury heard the evidence...

So fraud is a "victimless crime" when trump does it. The jury and the judge didn't think so.

The 4 years that resulted in 2 impeachments, a bungled COVID-19 response, an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election and illegally stay in power. That 4 years?

The Washington Examiner is a far-right publication. It is not a credible, unbiased source.

Gaffe machine? Have you listened to trump? He's outright incoherent. Poor debater? Why is trump afraid of debating her? And your entire Gabbard point is ridiculous. She threw a few punches just like she did for years against Obama. Where is she now? On Fox and at CPAC. Electoral record? She's...

Trump received 46% of the total vote in both the 2016 and 2020 elections. Clinton and Biden received 48% and 51%, respectively. Voters are more likely to vote for a Democrat and have in 7 of the 8 last presidential elections.