Luxury-Agency
Montreal Escorts

Best Agency of the Year for 2011

Siocnarf

New Member
Jul 30, 2011
1,796
2
0
Snuggletown
If an agency decides to function under two names they should be treated separately for the vote. They get to post twice as much, so its only fair that their votes become diluted. Maybe they should be banned from reality for having to many handles :smile:.
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,560
28
48
48
Where I belong.
Merlot,
The purpose of this, or any other, poll is to reflect the intent of the voters. Among the votes cast so far, there are seventeen (17) for Candyshop/Chloes. You have chosen to split these votes in two, based upon which of the names were listed first. You did this clearly paying no, zero, nada heed to the intent of those voting.

You may continue to blaze ahead in the darkness, if you so choose, but you run the risk of putting significant effort into something you are rendering meaningless. Should you continue on this course, what you will wind up with is the hanging chad of merb polls
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,560
28
48
48
Where I belong.
Why is it you have to presume to speak for everyone and have to be so arrogantly over-bearing, especially when I have already said I am fine with what others wish? With all of your pushy hyperbole you push you act like your view is the only one. Get over that. And no nasty PMs.
What others wish, and have clearly stated, is that Chloes/Candyshop is a single operation, just as 17 (seventeen) of them posted. I am not speaking for these 17; they voted for themselves. I can only assume that they do not wish to have their votes split in a random fashion. (ie. the first one listed) You decided to change these votes.

Hyperbole? Not so. Seventeen. I counted each one.
 

Merlot

Banned
Nov 13, 2008
4,111
0
0
Visiting Planet Earth
What others wish, and have clearly stated, is that Chloes/Candyshop is a single operation, just as 17 (seventeen) of them posted. I am not speaking for these 17; they voted for themselves. I can only assume that they do not wish to have their votes split in a random fashion. (ie. the first one listed) You decided to record the votes otherwise.

Hyperbole? Not so. Seventeen. I counted each one.

I made one suggestion in your poll. You answered, and I accepted without pushing or posting further despite strong disagreement because I am just one equal member. Yet you bring allusions of "darkness" and other tripe here and keep pushing your point of view like the overlord of polls.

Try learning to be an equal among members.
 

Justforfun

New Member
Aug 29, 2004
194
1
0
59
Rive-Sud de Montréal
Visit site
So let me see if I understand this world hunger saving "DILEMMA" !!!!!

Jezzz!!! Really guys ?

The poll is to evaluate members appreciations of agencies operations and personnel. Right ?

The fact, in my humble view :rolleyes:, is if an agencie uses the same operational admin team to operate a single or multiple business entities, it should be considered as one single operation. Who cares if they have 2, 3, 4 or 5 different business names if they're operating with the same bookers and admin people and sometime same ladies its the same operation to me.

Obviously the girls makes the difference but they come, move on and leave. The admin team is responsible to operate and manage all aspects of their business so they are well established and viewed as a solid agency to call on.

CandyShop / Chloe's is an obvious example (unless your color blind or else). I also remember girls being listed on both of Devilish / MGOF web sites at one point. So these 2 agencies should treated as such single entities that have multiples names. Simple no ?

So to recap, I believe this is an actual list of agencies recognized by members on this thread up to now;
(in alphabetical order so no one can fly off the deep end and freak out)

Angel escorts
Asservissante
Candy Shop/Chloe' PLayground
Devilish/MGOF
Eleganza
Goodgirls
Girls4U
Montreal Angels
Montreal LUST
Montreal Sex city
Montreal XXXtase
Nadia's VIP
Satin Dreamz

Good day
 

WoodyWoody

Banned
Jul 19, 2008
248
0
0
The top 3 it's more like a top 2

In alaphabatical order
Eleganza
Good year for the boys at Eleganza its know to all that these guys are the constant leaders in fiding talent . Great job overall guys thank you John and Joe .
2012 will be just as great .

Nadya's VIPs
Whenever you have Neva among your ranks it makes you an automatic contender , but with the recent addition of Leah wooow now we're really talking .
These two backed up with Lauren and Alayna who I'm told will soon be back along with Cindy this is serious business .
Well done.

Unorable mentions
Angel Escorts
The year ended in a so os way for Tony using fake pics , Jazz pics are awful and the word is that Tabatha is back giving so so service the way she before being at Angels.
Still this is the stongest line up in Montreal but the way it's currently handled 2012 will not be good .


W.W.
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
I vote:

1. Asservissante
2. Candy Shop/Chloe' PLayground
3. Devilish/MGOF -

Did I just make 3 votes or 5 votes?

Maybe, Candy Shop should get 1/2 vote and Chloe Playground should get 1/2 vote and
Devilish would get 1/2 vote and MGOF would get 1/2 vote in that case?

What do you think Merlot and Rumps? You guys are the scorekeepers in the end.

 

lgna69xxx

New Member
Oct 3, 2008
10,414
11
0
Make that one more Rumps.

Ok...... here goes,

1. Asservissante
2.Nadya's

AND for my #3, split these up in the following way please:

Candyshop 1/4 a vote
Chloes 1/4
Gof 1/4
Devilish 1/4


"And no nasty PMs" (haha, priceless!) :lol:




The question is whether or not he plans to delegitimatize the county by arbitrarily changing your vote, mine, and 16 others.
 

GuitarPlaya

Member
Aug 31, 2007
82
2
8
Well I've only done business with Tony at AngelEscorts and was always satisfied so my vote goes to AngelEscorts ...
 

cloudsurf

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2003
4,936
2,201
113
Hello all,

Last Edited Jan 8, 9:35

CURRENT LIST:

Angel Escorts - Merlot, thegreatwalooo, quest, ManApart, MasterPuppet, TheHeat, WoodyWoody, GuitarPlaya (6)

Cheers,

Merlot
I clarified my 3rd choice and added Angel Escorts.
Tony has always been easy to deal with and one of my new ATF`s , Natalia, is there
 

sapman99

Born again punter
Nov 13, 2005
707
48
28
65
Buddha-Bar
Very well done. Thank you for your efforts and time put into this endeavour :smile:.
 

Mod 8

New Member
Jun 7, 2007
3,717
2
0
16
I would like to make a suggestion for this poll and any others that are to follow. I would suggest that there should be a prerequisite number of posts or reviews on MERB for someone's vote to be counted and those reviews should include at least one review for each voted for agency. Obviously I have no intention of making rules regarding any poll that members wish to have but it makes sense to me that someone should have a review history to be eligible to vote in such a poll.
 

ManApart

Respect & Honour
Jul 4, 2011
1,405
3
0
45
On The Front lines
I would suggest that there should be a prerequisite number of posts or reviews on MERB for someone's vote to be counted and those reviews should include at least one review for each voted for agency.

A very good suggestion Mod. I'm not going to start a whole thing, but sometimes when you see a bunch of members using their first post ever to cast a vote, you wonder if the real concensus is being taken. You can't force the more experienced hobbyists and MERB members to participate, but at least requiring a voter to have made a review on the agency they are voting for is a good way to add some further legitimacy to the results.
 

sapman99

Born again punter
Nov 13, 2005
707
48
28
65
Buddha-Bar
legitmacy... in an internet poll... :lol:
Ever ready with the helpful quip. My man...

I heartily endorse the suggestion made by Mod 8
 

evillethings

Fun n games til some1...
Dec 29, 2010
1,144
3
0
A very good suggestion Mod. I'm not going to start a whole thing, but sometimes when you see a bunch of members using their first post ever to cast a vote, you wonder if the real concensus is being taken. You can't force the more experienced hobbyists and MERB members to participate, but at least requiring a voter to have made a review on the agency they are voting for is a good way to add some further legitimacy to the results.

agreed MA + M8.
it'd give us a fairly accurate view of agencies by merb hobbyists. however 2 barriers:
1. not sure all agencies want accurate results
2. not sure the thread's author wants to do all the extra tallying even if they have the time daily.
 

Numerati

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2009
1,826
963
113
Montreal Girlfriends

after all these years alexandra and her people are still consistent with both quality and quantity. just find their logistics a bit waning but still above par.
 

Lovemaker

Banned
Nov 4, 2009
507
0
0
I would suggest that there should be a prerequisite number of posts or reviews on MERB for someone's vote to be counted and those reviews should include at least one review for each voted for agency.

I support this!
 
Toronto Escorts