As i stated earlier;
I’m not a fan of either extreme. One thing I will say, though: I’ll never celebrate someone’s death or an attack on anyone - no matter what political side they’re on. That kind of extremist mindset is something I’ll never stand behind. A great example is how I get criticized from the right for being a “hoe,” like that defines my whole personality or that I can’t think for myself on certain topics - as if my values must automatically align with my work. It’s wild.
I don’t associate with any political party because, honestly, they’re all corrupt. But if I had to choose the lesser of two evils, I lean more conservative these days.
However, over the years, I’ve grown extremely intolerant of the left and their antics and gaslighting of the whole population.
For context: I’m actually an ex-liberal. You know, one of those people who used to get labeled “
crazy” for being into; free speech, open debate or individual autonomy.
Over time, I started noticing that the values which once felt foundational to liberalism (skepticism of power, support for dissent, respect for personal freedom) were being sidelined or redefined in ways that made less and less sense to me.
Some of the other reasons I walked away from liberalism:
- Free speech started to feel conditional.
The same circles that once championed “I may not agree with what you say, but I’ll defend your right to say it” began to embrace censorship, de-platforming, and social shaming - not just for hate speech, but for
disagreement. Even mild dissent or questions could get you labeled a bigot, a fascist, or worse.
- Identity politics became a litmus test.
There was a shift from championing equal treatment to obsessing over race, gender, and identity in ways that felt reductive and even divisive. I started to feel like the individual didn’t matter anymore - only your group identity did. That didn’t sit right with me.
- The redefinition of “tolerance.”
Ironically, the more progressive spaces started to form, the less room there was for ideological diversity. Tolerance seemed to mean “we welcome you as long as you agree with us.” It felt less like a movement for justice and more like a cult.
- Science and objectivity became optional.
I saw movements increasingly reject data, biology, and open inquiry in favor of ideological orthodoxy. If evidence contradicted the narrative, the evidence had to go. That’s a dangerous mindset - no matter where it comes from.
- Victimhood and virtue signalling.
There’s now cultural currency in being offended or oppressed, and some movements have turned this into a hierarchy - where your moral authority depends on your perceived victimhood.
- Hypocrisy around power and institutions.
I watched liberals go from distrusting government overreach ... to cheering on censorship and surveillance. As long as it came from the
right institutions or targeted the
wrong people.
^^^To name a few hahaha^^^
Going back to Charlie, as I also stated — I didn’t agree with everything he said. But many of the things he touched on were common-sense topics that today’s world often seems to overlook or reject. We live in a democracy (something I feel like some people tend to forget), where
freedom of speech isn’t just a nice idea - it’s a fundamental right.
That means we’re free to have open, sometimes uncomfortable debates without fear of censorship or backlash. It means
different opinions (even unpopular or challenging ones) deserve to be heard and discussed. That’s how societies grow, learn, and improve.
Yet, increasingly, it feels like disagreement is treated as an attack, and conversations get shut down instead of opened up.
Charlie’s willingness to tackle these tough conversations at times even if imperfectly reminds me of the value of honest dialogue. (I now fear for others who do this)
Celebrating a person’s death shows just how cowardly some people are. It’s the easiest and lowest way to express disagreement: attacking or cheering someone on when they’re no longer able to defend themselves.