Devilish Escorts New Glamour Pro Photo's Will Keep Me From Trusting (Using) Them!

[HarmonyNYC]

The thumbs down is for the real bad move Devilish did regarding the new glamour photos' they are now using for the new girls.

Bad move Devilish!

I am sure you made this move to make your website better but it makes it worse. Yes it makes it prettier but not better for us.

This thread is not meant to bash Devilish. It is only my take on what I think is a great error they have made that will keep me from using them again. I hope they will go back to more "realistic" photo's that show the real girl's. Until that happens I don't even need to look at their website.

Before they started using these ultra professional dreamy looking glamor photos you could trust what you where seeing.

That is not true anymore.

This is not true anymore because all you see now are photo's that do not show the real girl but some perfected glamour dream like shots that do not show the real girl.

The old real photo's showed what the girls skin really looked like. What tone she had to her body or not. The old real pictures showed real curves, small curves or large curves you could visually measure what you where looking at.

Now these dreamy glamour photo's show undefined dreamy girls that you can not measure what their real skin is like, what tone they have to their body or not. These new dreamy glamour photos hide allot everything I want to see.

If I was a mid-level model I would want this kind of dreamy glamour photos because it makes the ordinary look glamourous and dreamy.

If I need to choose a girl based on photo's I need to see real untouched plain quality photo's. Give me dreamy glamour photo's and I have nothing to measure the girl with so I will just move on to the next website that has real pictures like Eleganza.

I will not be able choose and I will be choosing any of the new girls from Devilish if I have these dreamy glamour photo's to make my choice. Sorry Devilish but you have lost me as a client.

P.S.

When I say "real" I mean pictures that show the real girl. I am not saying Devilish has fake pictures.

But the dreamy glamour pictures they are now using make the mind (my mind) think they are fake before I know if they are or not.

But even if they are real they do not show the real girl so to me they are as good as fake (not that I am saying they are fake, they could be real, I don't know either way, but it matters not because to me they are as good as fake).

 

[Just-ass-weet]

You cannot please all of the people all of the time

Boy, do you ever make this old axiom true!

However, I think you are over-reacting, quite a bit I might add. These are far from glamour shots, and maybe the tone is touched - whoopdeedoop! I have to admire the creators of Devilish, they have young, cute girls, who seem to offer the kind of session the guys like. The only thing they apparently are missing is an over the top receptionist who won't put people on hold or rush the guys on the phone.

You can never please everyone anyhow, if you put up plain jane pics, some guys will turn away, too glamourous and others will not trust the pics. I say, they did a heck of a good job, from experience, I KNOW how hard that is. In the end my dear HarmonyNYC - this is one case where I would have to say - YOUR LOSS!

xoxox
Anik

 

[HonestAbe]

I was kind of wondering the same thing...

I was just looking over some of these photos since someone told me they had just seen two of these girls within the past week and he had mixed reviews on them. First off, the photos do look really nice, but then again I have been B&S'd before. However, I was told that the girls my source saw were somewhat accurately represented except for something that wasn't shown in the pictures for one of them. Everyones idea of a touch up job is different. Is it really Dr'ing the photo or are these girls wearing extensive makeup? Can the shape of their body actually be altered so as to take off 10 to 15 pounds? Can their skin be darkened/lightened?

I'm not sure if HarmonyNYC is saying he has extensive knowledge of what was done to these shots or if he has simply heard rumours that such programs can be used to really change someones look so as to be unrepresentative of what the person looks like to the naked eye when standing in front of you with the lights on. Not being any kind of an expert on this matter I would be interested in someone with actual knowledge in this area to tell us just how much Dr'ing can be done on such photos nowadays, and if in their opinion these PARTICULAR photos look like they have been subjected to heavy tampering in any areas.

If not, I'd be interested in several of these ladies, particularly Chloe who appears to be quite pretty.

 

[madmax-1]

Overboard?

Hey guys, lighten up! Perhaps this is the inevitable backlash from all the accolades Devilish has received in recent months, but you would be foolish to think that any photos appear on a website of any quality without some touch-up. Even someone as techno-challenged as I am knows how to use photoshop to make a photo look better. Every girl I've ever known wants to have some blemishes or perhaps identifying tatoos erased from her photos. I don't consider the new Devilish photos "glamour shots" at all. Like many of the earlier posters, I prefer some of the older pictures and also like some of the newer photos, but let's not go OTT about one of the best agencies in town.

 

[B1G]

To each, his own.

I rely on reviews here on MERB to make my choice on who I make appointements with. Don't get me wrong, I have met with SP's that had not been reviewed before, but that was based on what had been said about the agency. When I feel I can trust whoever is on the other end of the phone I can be tempted to try newbies.

Now for the photos.... I think they look great. Madison's picture does not look 'modified' at all. (I've seen her recently) True the pictures are 'dreamy like' but using a Professional Photographer can't be a reason to dismiss an agencie's loyal and honest service.

The Devilish 'recruiting team' works hard and get's excellent results. The receptionists do a great job. And now the photographer is a PRO. Say what you want... I only see good positive stuff here !!!!

PS Remember... If these guys work so hard being honest, and they get good buisness from being that way... why would they start modifing pictures too make girls look better then they really look?

 

[FlyBob]

Guys,

We complained forever about the old pics...now that they are a LOT better we complain? It's not against you HarmonyNYC, I agree that if the pics are pros it might advantage the girls but regarding Melina I gave so much crap to chris (so did Melina herself and several clients) that he made them up again and having seen her I can certify she looks a lot closer in real than the old pics!! (insert icon of someone puking lol).

I don't think that Eeganza is any better...I saw krystal, Athena and Helene and the last 2 were a LOT different in real!! Helene has much darker and shorter hairs, and hiding her face is a major turn off!

Oh, and exact same thing for kiki...the old shots were making her look like an average girl that didn't look like a warm sensual person that has a great smile!

Cheers!

 

[Joe.t]

"Before they started using these ultra professional dreamy looking glamor photos you could trust what you where seeing"

I would have to disagree with you, have you seen any of the girls in person? you should do that before passing judgement, madison for example looks absolutley nothing like her first pictures which surprised me when i opened the door because thats who i was expecting, the pictures that they have now looks exactly like the madison i saw.

 

[Special K]

Totally Absurd!

The thumbs down is for the real bad move Devilish did regarding the new glamour photos` they are now using for the new girls.

Bad move Devilish!

I am sure you made this move to make your website better but it makes it worse. Yes it makes it prettier but not better for us.

This thread is not meant to bash Devilish. It is only my take on what I think is a great error they have made that will keep me from using them again. I hope they will go back to more "realistic" photo`s that show the real girl`s. Until that happens I don`t even need to look at their website.

Before they started using these ultra professional dreamy looking glamor photos you could trust what you where seeing.

That is not true anymore.

This is not true anymore because all you see now are photo`s that do not show the real girl but some perfected glamour dream like shots that do not show the real girl.

The old real photo`s showed what the girls skin really looked like. What tone she had to her body or not. The old real pictures showed real curves, small curves or large curves you could visually measure what you where looking at.

Now these dreamy glamour photo`s show undefined dreamy girls that you can not measure what their real skin is like, what tone they have to their body or not. These new dreamy glamour photos hide allot everything I want to see.

If I was a mid-level model I would want this kind of dreamy glamour photos because it makes the ordinary look glamourous and dreamy.

If I need to choose a girl based on photo`s I need to see real untouched plain quality photo`s. Give me dreamy glamour photo`s and I have nothing to measure the girl with so I will just move on to the next website that has real pictures like Eleganza.

Something sure doesn`t sound right about this thread. You have got to be farkin` kidding me!! You mean to tell us that you`re upset and not going to use Devilish again because they`ve updated and improved the photos of their girls , this could be one of the most asinine posts I`ve read on Merb in quite some time!

As far as I`ve seen from this agency the common denominator in most every review was that the reviewers continuously said that the girls were far better looking in person, and that the photos on the website didn`t do them justice to show how attractive they really are.

Now I`m looking at the photos and I don`t see anything out of the ordinary as far as touch ups, etc. Has a tattoo or something been removed? Quite possibly and it`s even posted in plain view on the site, in case you didn`t see that, here it is taken from their site

Girl`s Description...
The pictures you see are the real pictures, we do not believe in any form of bait and switch. The only thing that may have been removed from the pictures is a tattoo, the reason for this is so as to keep the confidentiality of some of our ladies.

I have to agree with Anik here in that I guess it`s true that you can`t please all the people all the time as evidenced by this posters account of the new Devilish photos NOT being nice enough "Not So Great" and the thread starters saying they`re too nice.

P.S.

When I say "real" I mean pictures that show the real girl. I am not saying Devilish has fake pictures.

But the dreamy glamour pictures they are now using make the mind (my mind) think they are fake before I know if they are or not.

But even if they are real they do not show the real girl so to me they are as good as fake (not that I am saying they are fake, they could be real, I don`t know either way, but it matters not because to me they are as good as fake).

I guess when you`re on top of the Montreal market and doing things right it makes the competition extremely cutthroat Why are you posting this here as opposed to The Lounge HNYC? Look for another place to sharpen that axe. That`s just my opinion.

I will not be able choose and I will be choosing any of the new girls from Devilish if I have these dreamy glamour photo`s to make my choice. Sorry Devilish but you have lost me as a client.

Lastly, I for one am glad you won`t be using this agency Harmony, it means there`s 1 less person to get in the way of me seeing the girls I`d like to see on my future trip.

 

[Special K]

Wich one is Cindy formely form Eleganza; Crystelle?

JNJ

I don't think any of them are JNJ and definitely not Crystelle.

 

[Diablo35]

Lastly, I for one am glad you won't be using this agency Harmony, it means there's 1 less person to get in the way of me seeing the girls I'd like to see on my future trip.

HooRaaa on that one brother! We can all do with a little less compitition for this agency's attentions... For the record, I like the pictures and no my reasonably techno-savy eye they do not appear overly touched up. Certainly not sufficient to cause any concern about being unsure about what you're going to get at the door.

 

[EagerBeaver]

The old real photo's showed what the girls skin really looked like. What tone she had to her body or not. The old real pictures showed real curves, small curves or large curves you could visually measure what you where looking at.

In my opinion, the new photos of Madison are much more respresentative of what she looks like in person than the old ones.

 

[Romantic1]

Dumb thread. But great for Devilish

I think the new pics of Kiki, for example, are terrible. The old ones weren't great, but the new ones are terrible.

And yes, I've seen her in person and she is a stunner. One of the most beautiful girls I have seen. Not at all reflected in the pics. So much for the thread starter's nonsense LOL

 

[Techman]

I'm far from a photoshop expert but the new pictures show no typical signs of drastic editing. These pics are much better than the original ones on the site but I feel that has as much to do with the quality of the original photo than any post processing. They mention on the site that in some cases certain identifying marks may have been removed at the girl's request and I feel that this is all that has been done. It's amazing the difference it makes when someone is photographed in proper lighting by a decent photographer who knows how to pose the lady properly. If clients start to notice vast differences between the pics and the girl who shows up at the door then that's the time to start complaining. So far that doesn't seem to be happening as all the reviews I've seen have nothing but good things to say about both the ladies and the agency itself.

 

[MG_mtl]

In my opinion, the new photos of Madison are much more respresentative of what she looks like in person than the old ones.

Funny you would say that... I would say the exact opposite.

BTW I agree this thread is really ridiculous... if you don't like or don't trust the pics don't use the agency and move on.

 

[FlyBob]

Lastly, I for one am glad you won't be using this agency Harmony, it means there's 1 less person to get in the way of me seeing the girls I'd like to see on my future trip.

So true!!!
Hmmm...I see that you and Diablo35 are my competition hehe.

Cheers!

 

[EagerBeaver]

MG_Mtl,

I must agree with Tex on the Madison pics. I think you have simply forgotten the old pics, because the new pics more accurately depict what Madison looks like in person. There is no doubt in my mind about this. Obviously, Chris must think so too.

However I do agree with you that the thread is pointless. If you don't like an agency's pics, or think they lack representativeness, I am not sure it follows that there is a reasonable or logical basis for proclaiming that you will not do business with the agency. I can tick off numerous examples of different agencies who put up pics of ladies that did not do justice to what they looked like in person. Examples:

Melissa (old) at Class XXX - way better looking in person
Megan of IN - way better looking in person
Katryna of DC - better looking in person
Daniella ex of CF and Eleganza - way better looking in person
Emely of Eleganza - better looking and more petite in person

These are just some random examples that come to mind.

 

[MG_mtl]

MG_Mtl,
I must agree with Tex on the Madison pics. I think you have simply forgotten the old pics...

... or maybe I just have a different opinion then you guys? Think that's possible?

 

[EagerBeaver]

... or maybe I just have a different opinion then you guys? Think that's possible?

Could be!

 

[nueromagus]

Great!!

I 4 one am glad to hear Harmony say that.
Maybe then I can get an easier booking when I get to Mtl.!
(not bloody likely....)

 

[Greenmachine]

cant help but throw my two cents in

let me ask yall this. when they start putting up fake pics from pornsites, how are we going to know the difference?

sure, the more prolific posters will eventually get around to confirming the validity of every pic on the site, but those of us who make infrequent pilgrimages to the mecca are severly at risk of deception.

I also prefer real pics to touched up pics. If it looks like it came off a $200 canon digital camera, than I trust it a hell of alot more than what is up there now.