chowhound said:
I have heard it asserted that for some reason showing an id can be a way of verifying that the customer is not LE. How does this follow? LE have identification also, real or otherwise. The practice should be resisted, Just refuse to show it. If everyone refused, the practice would soon be abandoned.
You're right. LE can easily come up with real or fake ID. They can also say that they work for some company, and set up a fake number so that when you call the number to see if the client actually works there, some real-sounding fake receptionist can say yes. I recall a bust where the undercover would say that he worked for UPS. He had authentic looking business cards and a working phone number to back it up. That is why I see that increasingly amongst indys and some agencies, they prefer to use references from other SPs that they are familiar with.
I think the SPs may want to see ID for safety purposes, and to verify that the call is not a prank. Such as a bunch of frat boys sending an SP to a total stranger's home or hotel room.
I would say that in the US, ID may be necessary upon first using the indy or agency, just because that makes them feel safer. It also depends on where you are in the US. Some cities, such as LA and Vegas, have very active, well-funded Vice Divisions, so ID requirements and references will probably be very strict there. Other cities don't have the funds or the political motivations to go after agencies (or LE simply doesn't care), so the SPs there will not be too strict about asking for ID.
In Montreal, especially for outcall, I don't see why ID would be needed, unless it's in a run-down no tell motel or the SP just gets a nervous vibe from you.