I know the exotic dancer license was taken to court and was deemed unconstitutional. So as far as I know, in certain jursidictions in Ontario, or province wide it is gone and these dancers are hopefully getting their money back. This is the only article I could find. Hopefully it is allowed to copy and paste this.
By Roberta Pennington, The Windsor Star
Published: Tuesday, January 09, 2007
A Windsor bylaw requiring exotic dancers to pay a special licence fee is "discriminatory" and "excessive," the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled Tuesday. lawyer Myron Shulgan, who represented seven Windsor strip clubs, said the court struck down the bylaw because it treats employees in the same job class differently, based on attire. "A female bartender who is partially nude is required to be licensed, but a female bartender working alongside the former who's fully clothed is not required to be licensed," Shulgan said. "The court said that that discriminates between the two employees of the same class." The decision echoes one made by the Superior Court in September, which the city had appealed. Adult entertainment club employees who worked in the nude or partially nude - and were classified as "dancers" by the city - were required to buy a licence at a cost of $466 annually once the bylaw took effect Jan. 1, 2005. Barry Maroon, manager of Leopard's Lounge, said the licensing fee imposed imposed a high cost on the club, which paid for the fees on the dancers' behalf. "The amount of the licensing fees to these girls and the fact that they got singled out, it just seems unfair," Maroon said. Adult entertainment parlours are also required to buy a business licence and ensure their managers are licensed. Most of the fee charged to the dancers - $298 of the $466 - helped to cover the cost of policing in the downtown area in violation of the Municipal Act, Judge E.E. Gillese wrote in the ruling. "The cost of maintaining a police presence in the downtown core is not a cost 'directly related to the administration and enforcement of the bylaw,'" Gillese ruled. "So, it is not recoverable by way of licensing fees."