She was not part of the list I received from the mods but since she's a supporting member with adds in 2022, you can vote for her manually but in the appropriate indy SP thread please!
Montreal Escorts Official Best of year 2022 discussion!
- Thread starter MrProfiteroles
- Start date
- Status
I just replied with all the rejected votes in each SP pool threads.
If I see more votes like these, they will get rejected too!
Last edited:
Exactly and that's why I didn't include her this year too. But she was definitely interested to vote for you!
Indeed we love doing duo together ☺️Exactly and that's why I didn't include her this year too. But she was definitely interested to vote for you!
If providers and agency want to vote let’s set a poll for best client!?!?!?!
Actually, someone proposed me by PM to start a booker thread!
Depending on the number of like (thumbs up) or dislike (sad) I'll see if i start it or not.
I'm agree with that the booker of the year .... for sure you see the girls but all the works I the back stage is us the booker
Everyone,
MrProfiteroles and General TAO are merely running the polls with the new Rule about eligibility; they're not responsible for it.
If anyone has questions about why certain providers, etc., are not considered eligible for the polls, please contact the moderation instead of making off-topic comments.
Thanks for your collaboration
MrProfiteroles and General TAO are merely running the polls with the new Rule about eligibility; they're not responsible for it.
If anyone has questions about why certain providers, etc., are not considered eligible for the polls, please contact the moderation instead of making off-topic comments.
Thanks for your collaboration
Just to be clear, I'm volunteer and I'm running this by myself without help (sharky, Marsouin, Aspirine no more helping me).
I simplified the way to vote this year to include ALL Merb's members (not only the reviewer like previous year) with automated pool thread to save me time.
But now I need to go through all the votes and see who try to cheat and boost their vote!
You are wasting my time!!!!
I simplified the way to vote this year to include ALL Merb's members (not only the reviewer like previous year) with automated pool thread to save me time.
But now I need to go through all the votes and see who try to cheat and boost their vote!
You are wasting my time!!!!
Ok we’re back to serious now and sorry for the disruption! Girls won’t be voting from now on. You’re allowed to give me a little spanking next time you see me for misbehaving and not reading the rules properly Good luck to all the girls, I would’ve voted for all of you if I could’ve!! Love y’all and happy new year 2023 xx H
Thank Heaven for your words! Appreciated.
Happy new year to you too! Xoxo
And I'm taking note for the "big" spanking!
Important announcement!
The previous 5 years under the administration of the Best of year SP pools by Jalimon (2017, 2018), Sharkman (2019) and myself (2020, 2021), we required a link to a "meaningful" review wrote by the member in the previous year so only those that contributed to the board were eligible to vote!
That said, all members registered before December 1st are still eligible to vote and provide 1 point to the SP they voted or will vote in any Best of year SP pool threads.
But starting now and for the remaining of the voting period ending January 15th, any eligible members that voted in a SP pool thread and reply with a link to a "meaningful" review they wrote in 2022 to the SP(s) they voted will provide 2 additional points to the corresponding SP(s) for a total of 3 points.
All the validated review links (liked by me) will be counted at the end of the voting period for the final result.
That way, all eligible members are still included to vote but those that contributed in 2022 to the board get more importance to their vote(s).
This new rule is applicable for the following SP pool threads:
As an example,
I just provided my review links in the Agency Veteran SP pool thread here:
I voted for Hailey@Euphoria, Laura@VOG and Sienna@Euphoria in the pool thread above.
My posts in Hailey thread provide significant information to be considered as a "meaningful" review.
My review in Laura thread is a "meaningful" review.
My posts in Sienna thread didn't provide that much information and can't be considered as reviews.
I also wrote a meaningful review of Charlie@VOG in 2022, but since I didn't vote for her I can't use it:
So in my case, Hailey will get 3 points from me, Laura 3 points too, Sienna only 1 point and Charlie no point.
Hope that clarify the way the review links will be counted.
Thanks to all reviewers that contributed to the board!
The administrator of Best of year SP pools
MrP
The previous 5 years under the administration of the Best of year SP pools by Jalimon (2017, 2018), Sharkman (2019) and myself (2020, 2021), we required a link to a "meaningful" review wrote by the member in the previous year so only those that contributed to the board were eligible to vote!
That said, all members registered before December 1st are still eligible to vote and provide 1 point to the SP they voted or will vote in any Best of year SP pool threads.
But starting now and for the remaining of the voting period ending January 15th, any eligible members that voted in a SP pool thread and reply with a link to a "meaningful" review they wrote in 2022 to the SP(s) they voted will provide 2 additional points to the corresponding SP(s) for a total of 3 points.
All the validated review links (liked by me) will be counted at the end of the voting period for the final result.
That way, all eligible members are still included to vote but those that contributed in 2022 to the board get more importance to their vote(s).
This new rule is applicable for the following SP pool threads:
As an example,
I just provided my review links in the Agency Veteran SP pool thread here:
I voted for Hailey@Euphoria, Laura@VOG and Sienna@Euphoria in the pool thread above.
My posts in Hailey thread provide significant information to be considered as a "meaningful" review.
My review in Laura thread is a "meaningful" review.
My posts in Sienna thread didn't provide that much information and can't be considered as reviews.
I also wrote a meaningful review of Charlie@VOG in 2022, but since I didn't vote for her I can't use it:
So in my case, Hailey will get 3 points from me, Laura 3 points too, Sienna only 1 point and Charlie no point.
Hope that clarify the way the review links will be counted.
Thanks to all reviewers that contributed to the board!
The administrator of Best of year SP pools
MrP
Last edited:
I’ve only seen 3 of all the Indy listed. How I am suppose to vote in good conscious knowing I’m not giving the other inductees a fair chance? What should I do?!?!
Select for who you want to vote and cast your vote(s) or just don't vote!
I'm administrator of the pools not counselor for who you should vote and I don't force anybody to vote!
And you should also go read post #33 from mod21!
Last edited:
KRS - Appreciate your efforts but none of my favorite MPs are eligible for voting this year. So I won't be voting.
Post in thread 'Montreal Escorts Official Best of year 2022 discussion!' https://merb.cc/xenforo/threads/mon...t-of-year-2022-discussion.217491/post-1481368
*****SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT!******
Except for the Agency pool thread, I just realized I set all other SP pool threads to end next Monday night instead of tomorrow night.
So, I'll let eligible members to vote up to tomorrow Sunday noon in SP pool threads and then I'll ask the mods to lock all of them to let me compile the votes in the afternoon.
Thanks to all members that voted and posted their review link so far!
Except for the Agency pool thread, I just realized I set all other SP pool threads to end next Monday night instead of tomorrow night.
So, I'll let eligible members to vote up to tomorrow Sunday noon in SP pool threads and then I'll ask the mods to lock all of them to let me compile the votes in the afternoon.
Thanks to all members that voted and posted their review link so far!
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Sticky
- Poll
- Locked
- Sticky
- Poll
- Locked
- Poll
