pressing vagina on uncovered penis

[2fast2slow]

I dont know if this is a trend, but I have had 3 escorts in recent weeks press down on my cock before I put on a condom, sort of a cow girl position without penetration. I was wondering about the safety of doing that? However, it is the sexiest thing! It is as close to bareback sex you're going to get. All 3 times the girls was dfking me while doing this, with their body full pressed upon mine...I'm getting hard just thinking about it. It made for an encounter which really makes you feel the girl is really inot to you. Nearly blew my load each time.

Have others received this <hybrid> service? is it dangerous? I personnaly dont think so

 

[hungry101]

I've had it many a time. The first time was when Liz of Xxxtase (later Britney of a bunch of places) nearly raped me. What a experience??? I love it.

 

[Lusty Pig]

If you have questions like this about a little bit of vaginal fluids touching you and you running scared for advice if you are going to catch something then YOU SHOULD NOT BE WITH THESE WOMEN. How many do you think gargle after blowing a guy ? how many do you think take a shower after a load is dumped on their tits? Here you are kissing them. Here you are sucking on those nipples that just had the jizz from before wiped off with a towel. Here you are putting your head on the pillow that I used before to put it under her pelvic region lying on her stomach to pound her from behind on top of her and my balls were sweating down and mixing with her juices onto that pillow. Are all you people living in denial about the germs involved in screwing escorts (hookers - I know, the word escorts makes us feel better about paying for it and gives us the illusion of no disease)

 

[THEHITMAN]

I kind of have to agree with lusty pig and cloudsurf on this one
Hungry101 I've experienced it a few times feels great

 

[Merlot]

Gents,

I've experienced this a number of times over the years, especially with very familiar escorts who were extremely comfortable with me. Usually it was preceded by some similar erotic naked rubbing contact elsewhere. It's very exciting if not also a bit of a nervous experience. The lady takes control and teases with me right at her entrance, as described by 2fast2slow. A couple of times my brain was racing with...OMG don't tell me she's going to...................which happened with a friend and one of his great favorites. But I knew mine wasn't going to go there....gratefully.

Regarding safety this site says even pre-cum may contain risks.

http://www.dcgogo.com/Health/page6.html

Many girls do it. Same health risks as a BBBJ
Some girls just love to rub their clit on your body.

Are you sure it's the same without the protection that saliva brings in a BBBJ? I would not say so definitively without a medical proof. Where's the documentation?

Good luck,

Merlot

 

[TheDon]

I agree with Merlot in that it is very erotic when there is skin to skin contact but when that skin is pussy on shaft of penis it's that more intense.

Your always thinking in the back of your mind the fear that she will slip your penis into her or it would slip in by mistake while she rocks back and forth.

So you argue with yourself whether to let her continue or push her off.

But in the end you eventually push her off as it feels so intense I would have cum from it.

 

[Merlot]

Gents,

I agree with Merlot in that it is very erotic when there is skin to skin contact but when that skin is pussy on shaft of penis it's that more intense.

So you argue with yourself whether to let her continue or push her off.

Yeah, I've found my mind racing with the dilemma, if she was actually going through with this as has happened with some, of choosing between the bliss of going as far with an escort as one has gone with a real girlfriend. Surely ones head is not in the best place to make the choice at this moment when he's rising fast in great excitement and already physically risen to exploit that excitement. For anyone like me for whom the condoms cut pleasure more than I would think it does for others, creating the temptations from this move is unwise. Though in my case I know I just won't go through with it, what would others do if very excited, drunk, high, or maybe willing given any chance.

Overall, I would say it's a fun move but one the ladies should never offer/tease with.

Happy choices,

Merlot

 

[BLSLover]

It's called a "Camel Toe Slide"

 

[Lily from Montreal]

Aspen I am sorry to disagree you are comparing apple with oranges, this ''camel toe'' move is not a guy trying to go in,it is a girl taking control by holding,firmly, the top third of ''toy'' and rubbing the bottom part of the shaft,well done there is no risk of body fluids exchanges,the free hand is place to block further slipping possibilities, yes it looks like she is rubbing herself but probably not lol
I like that position when I am freshly waxed as sensation is heavenly for me, BUT of course I would never consider that unless I am with trusted and favorite dates...This cannot be initiated by the guy so when you intone the ''no means no refrain'' it is not appropriate in this context...

 

[EagerBeaver]

If the woman is allowed to be in control in the dominant position on top and the guy is prone on his back with his cock in her hand, there is nothing he can do. The woman has the power in this position and any sudden thrust upward can be resisted by the simple expedient of snapping and crushing the cock.

Did none of you ever see the movie "The Evil That Men Do" with Charles Bronson? This 1980 movie brought into the mainstream the concept that crushing a man's cock with one's hand is a very effective method of self defense, as demonstrated by Charles Bronson in this movie. Go to the 1:10 mark of this video to observe Bronson's cock-crushing technique:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=268F5osfi8c

 

[Dreamer69]

One of my ATF's has been practicing this camel toe slide with me for about a year, sometimes I worry that she gets too close to entry,

I' ve had to pull back a few dozen times, I've actually cum a few times this way, too risky to practice unless you know her well.

P.S. please don't PM me for her name

 

[Left Coast]

One of my favorite Seattle escorts (now retired) loved the clitoral stimulation afforded by this practice (in cowgirl position) and I absolutely loved it. The only downside was one time when I fired a load that ended up landing on my chin, which caused a giggle on the part of the young lady.

 

[P.cole]

If you regularly dine at the Y then I cant see the clitoral stimulation as any riskier...

 

[EagerBeaver]

Genital warts is a legit concern and more with the woman to man transmission than vice versa because genital warts in women tend to be less visible than on men. So you might not see her warts rubbing on your cock.

One suggestion is that the same regimen that is employed after BBBJ should be utilized after a camel toe slide: sanitary hand wipes ("Wet Ones") copiously scrubbed over the contacted area after sex is over. I don't know for sure if those solutions kill viruses, however, and it is a question you should look at and ask your doctor with respect to the solution used. As Sidney noted that is the biggest issue with this practice.

As has been noted elsewhere there is an element of risk with all sexual activity and if you engage in it you should do whatever is possible to reduce the risk and use of sanitary hand wipes is one such risk reducer. You are frankly a moron if you don't do use them. I would use them even after condom-protected sex.

 

[EagerBeaver]

I'd dispute that but I'd have to see ask my gynecologist. My understanding is that *my* risk is elevated because male genital warts (any genital warts) don't always scream out "I'm contagious".

Warts manifest differently in a vagina and are usually less visible than on a male penis. Not always true and men can have small warts that are not readily visible.

 

[EagerBeaver]

Also, I'm not sure about this whole idea that "disinfecting" reduces contagion.

That is why Wet Ones are sold everywhere. They reduce contagion. It is the whole point of the product. Otherwise it would not exist as a product.

 

[Montrealmontreal]

HPV can be transmitted through skin-to-skin contact even when the person who is carrying it is not having a herpes outbreak and after you contract the HPV, there is a chance it will manifest itself as herpes/ warts so if you haven't gotten the HPV shot, i wouldn't suggest doing that, it's kinda stupid

 

[daydreamer41]

HPV can be transmitted through skin-to-skin contact even when the person who is carrying it is not having a herpes outbreak and after you contract the HPV, there is a chance it will manifest itself as herpes/ warts so if you haven't gotten the HPV shot, i wouldn't suggest doing that, it's kinda stupid

HPV is not herpes. It is Human Papillomavirus, which are warts. Herpes is HSV or Herpes Simplex Virus. There are 2 types Type 1, which is usually the type that breaks out in the mouth area and the Type 2, which breaks out in the groin area.

There is a shot for HPV or warts but not for herpes. Herpes is not warts. They look different than HPV and they are different viruses.

As far as HPV and the vaccine, there are different strains of the Human papillomavirus. You may have 1 strain and have not been exposed to the other strains, so it may not be a total waste. Plus, scientists have been working on developing vaccines, known as therapeutic vaccines, to treat and eliminate viruses. Future vaccines for HPV may be therapeutic vaccines.

 

[Montrealmontreal]

thanks for the clarification !! I got herpes and wart mixed up, and thought HPV shots can prevent herpes for the longest time, oh myy ...
can herpes be transmitted through skin to skin contact then ? even when the person is not currently having a herpes outbreak?

and yes i think the HPV vaccines are geared more towards women since the types that it guard against are those that can cause cervical cancer

 

[Merlot]

Hello all,

Most products EXIST because of marketing effectiveness and what the public believes about them. Whether or not they actually do what has been claimed for them is often far short of the claim and the belief, and frequently a total fraud despite claims or beliefs. The recent antibacterial soap episode of actual ineffectiveness and possible harm is just one example.

Wet Ones claims to kill germs on surfaces and may do so very well. Still I question whether "sanitary hand wipes ("Wet Ones") copiously scrubbed over the contacted area after sex is over" would work much. I think it's right to question if these kinds of products can really be effective against a sexual disease type of virus that even drugs designed to directly attack them cannot eliminate. Herpes for instance. Are Wet Ones or anything of the kind going to be effective when we know that these viruses have great staying power. In that case do we really want to put our trust in a sanitary wipe to cope with the vigorous contact of intercourse and the exchange of fluids that can go well beyond a condom, even if we use them before and after.

Also, I'm not sure about this whole idea that "disinfecting" reduces contagion.

Maybe up to a point, but whatever is gained by using them may be totally ineffective for sexual activity and the type of contact that goes on typically. I don't think these products were designed to be effective under those conditions, and probably aren't.

...I do know these "anti-biotic" products aren't able to kill *all* the pathogens. Some bacteria are stronger than others. My thinking is that there's a similar hierarchy in viruses, and HPV could be a tougher cookie.

As I said earlier, this is the very reason I feel a simple antibacterial wipes would only provide a false sense of security.

good luck,

Merlot