Montreal Escorts

Recent visitor in your profile!!!

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,842
549
113
With all due respect bookler l, not every subject in the universe has to be spoken about in your threads or do we have to research in search to find your thread (and lord knows you started threads on almost every subject in the universe ;) )
i'm just saying this because every question i see on merb, i see you put a link of a thread you started on a similar question seemingly suggesting that its old news or something?

I see this from Booker and EB. I wonder if there is a Copyrite or a patent on threads or something? LOL.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,348
2,648
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
I see this from Booker and EB. I wonder if there is a Copyrite or a patent on threads or something? LOL.

It's called board clutter/duplicative posting and there is a rule against it...............the Mods enforce it more than BookerL or me but it's generally not in the interest of the community to have multiple threads on the same subject because it leads to frustration in research, people not being able to find past threads and not having past posts on the same points read, the same questions being asked and answered over and over again, lazy research that does not reflect well on the redundant poster, and perpetuation of poor posting protocol and wasting of member's times. The community does not want it due to the reasons mentioned and Admin does not want it due to the fact that bandwidth, much like oil, is not a resource that exists in infinite quantities. What will likely happen down the road is that Mods will have to start deleting older threads that hold no value to the Board.....but it is a process that will be hastened by board clutter. I think it already happened once in the past if I recall correctly when they set up an archives in some other area, although that may have been changed.

Subjects like racism in the industry and STDs are the subject of so many new threads that many new ones simply just get locked by the Mods as soon as they get started or they get merged, but the merger is a problem for the Mods because they can't merge 1 with 12 and they have to decide which of the 12 is most valuable and informative which presumably causes them lots of work and then they get pissed seeing all the duplicative posts. So what I usually see is a lock and a warning issued to the redundant poster for lazy research effort.......

The Mods have even given me warnings for starting a thread on something already started........I had started a new thread on Brooke of Euphoria but due to a flaw in the search function I had not picked up a review by cobra which I think was in the incall forum although I had searched all forums........
 

panthere

Active Member
Jul 16, 2004
2,539
12
38
ZION
Visit site
It's called board clutter and there is a rule against it...............the Mods enforce it more than BookerL or me but it's generally not in the interest of the community to have multiple threads on the same subject because it leads to frustration in research, people not having past posts read, the same questions being asked and answered over and over again, lazy research that does not reflect well on the redundant poster. The community does not want it due to the reasons mentioned and Admin does not want it due to the fact that bandwidth, much like oil, is not a resource that exists in infinite quantities. What will likely happen down the road is that Mods will have to delete older threads that hold no value to the Board.....but it is a process that will be hastened by board clutter.

Yes i could agree a bite on your quote for other post with many response etc... if they have double ..That i could understand!...But to call lazy research my post is a bite way out of proportion...And also to let you know..if you go read the thread that Booker L did post....https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...hlight=do+you+check+your+profile+visitors+log
...in 2014...No comment where made and yes I didnt FIND IT...Sorry mister Eagerbeaver for the soooo much lack of my part...wow......Btw if the mod when to stop it..Or crush this post and keep Booker L alive then go for it...
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,348
2,648
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
Yes i could agree a bite on your quote for other post with many response etc... if they have double ..That i could understand!...But to call lazy research my post is a bite way out of proportion...And also to let you know..if you go read the thread that Booker L did post....https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...hlight=do+you+check+your+profile+visitors+log
...in 2014...No comment where made and yes I didnt FIND IT...Sorry mister Eagerbeaver for the soooo much lack of my part...wow......Btw if the mod when to stop it..Or crush this post and keep Booker L alive then go for it...

Panthere I was only commenting on the rule generally not on this thread. I agree that BookerL's past thread spawned no discussion and was impossible to find on any normal search. And I would give you a pass if I were a Mod on this thread, but a question was asked about the rule, and I answered it.
 

panthere

Active Member
Jul 16, 2004
2,539
12
38
ZION
Visit site
some peoples i really like there review style, so i check there profile to track other reviews they may have done. Thats usually why i go on a guy's profile.
Halloween Mike you are right cause i do the same thing...And check how long that person is been here...
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,842
549
113
It's called board clutter/duplicative posting and there is a rule against it.......

Board Clutter, eh? There is another: Anal-retentive. So what? Toss them out. We are not talking about the National Archives here.
 

Sol Tee Nutz

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2012
7,677
1,521
113
Look behind you.
The only board clutter I do not agree with is the people who reply with a quote and it is the first person replying to the OP or quote a 7 paragraph essay and the target is one phrase.
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,842
549
113
The only board clutter I do not agree with is the people who reply with a quote and it is the first person replying to the OP or quote a 7 paragraph essay and the target is one phrase.

Like I just did with the board clutter?
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,348
2,648
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
There has been a legitimate concern about board clutter in the past, and the primary reason for a rule against it is to keep research easy and simple, especially when there are multiple threads on the same SP or agency. However some topics have bedeviled the moderators, particularly those on the subjects of racism/bias and STDs. In the past, these threads were sometimes started with a specific agenda to tarnish a specific SP or agency. Other racism threads appeared to be based on ordinary miscommunication or conduct that the average fair minded person would not consider necessarily racism or bias but conduct attributable to other factors. Threads on STDs were started by persons who were not medical professionals posting theories or conclusions simply not backed by any credible scientific evidence, and the Mods had to shut them down as bullshit.

There are some topics where duplication of an old thread isn't necessarily a bad thing. I started a restaurant thread which was inactive for a while and then Panthere started another one. This was not really an issue because restaurant reviews are generally stale after 6 months anyway. If Panthere's thread is inactive for 6 or more months there should not be any objection to shutting it down and stockpiling or deleting it in favor of fresh reviews.

In the case of this thread, the main argument to leave it open and junk the BookerL thread is that the BooklerL thread spawned no comments or discussion. Therefore there was nothing in it that was duplicative, assuming someone researching the topic could actually find it. Unfortunately BookerL, although he has started a number of threads, does not always give them user-friendly or research-friendly titles, perhaps in part because French is his mother tongue and English is not. I don't know why- but many times, and not just with BookerL's threads, threads are started with titles that do not really indicate what exactly is under discussion, and this results in board clutter when nobody researching that topic can find the already started thread.

Over the years, the Moderators have at various times tried to drill down to members these various points, with only occasional success. They are usually hampered by newer members who simply come on the board half-cocked and don't do any research and assume they can start a discussion on anything. Some of the Mods have become very inflamed and irritated by such threads, and who can really blame them.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts