Yes but what is a game changer is being arrested and what I don't know is what might constitute an arrest under this decision - which could arguably encompass being detained at the border. Here is the decision:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-132_8l9c.pdf
You may be correct, but the lynchpin of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is the reasonableness test. How is it reasonable for a detained person at the border to have their cellphone searched? This is functionally indistinguishable from the situation at issue in these cases that were decided by the US Supreme Court.
In my book arrest means your ability to move about as you freely choose has stopped due to being to detained.I have handled false arrest cases in which the claim of arrest is detainment by a store security person. I do not see any functional distinction between a police arrest and a border agent's detainment of a person for further scrutiny.
Please also note that there is some discussion by the court of the reasonableness test as applied to cellphone searches. You are going to have to apply that same rationale to how reasonable it is for a customs and immigration agents to be searching cellphone data. We are not talking about searching somebody's trunk or glove compartment or something in plain view, necessarily, all of which would typically be exempted. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you go to the border and have something hidden in the trunk of your car or even in your suitcase for that matter. But you do have a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding your personal emails and your personal fucking shit in your cellphone!!!!!!!!!!!! There is a clear limit to what is encompassed within the reasonable expectation of privacy, and this goes beyond it.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-132_8l9c.pdf
You may be correct, but the lynchpin of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is the reasonableness test. How is it reasonable for a detained person at the border to have their cellphone searched? This is functionally indistinguishable from the situation at issue in these cases that were decided by the US Supreme Court.
In my book arrest means your ability to move about as you freely choose has stopped due to being to detained.I have handled false arrest cases in which the claim of arrest is detainment by a store security person. I do not see any functional distinction between a police arrest and a border agent's detainment of a person for further scrutiny.
Please also note that there is some discussion by the court of the reasonableness test as applied to cellphone searches. You are going to have to apply that same rationale to how reasonable it is for a customs and immigration agents to be searching cellphone data. We are not talking about searching somebody's trunk or glove compartment or something in plain view, necessarily, all of which would typically be exempted. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you go to the border and have something hidden in the trunk of your car or even in your suitcase for that matter. But you do have a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding your personal emails and your personal fucking shit in your cellphone!!!!!!!!!!!! There is a clear limit to what is encompassed within the reasonable expectation of privacy, and this goes beyond it.