Like I said, money. CIM or CIMSW is a difference in cost. Your white knight approach is admirable, but the thread isn't about it being gross, if we have tried it, or any of the other irrelevant things you posted.
The thread is about why some women do and some don't. How is the fact that some women find it gross irrelevant? That's the most relevant answer to the question. Why else? Read the several comments referring to oysters. What I might think is gross is relevant for me. Money doesn't change that and I don't care what someone else does either way. If someone is on the fence, then sure money might offer incentive and influence one way. But money doesn't factor into many providers choice.
The fact that some don't enables providers who do to charge for it. In that context, sure money plays a role. But you can't convince me to do something I don't want to do because you're offering money. I have to already be willing to do it. So your answer doesn't fully answer the question either.
Aside from not understanding what white knighting has to do with this, why is my question 'But would YOU do it?' so triggering? Men want women to 'taste' themselves all the time. For some reason, it's hot. Why don't men similarly 'taste' themselves? I'm not saying you should or have to. But if you can't or won't taste yourself (and it actually makes offends you), then why is there any need to even ask the why some women do and others don't?
Does being a woman genetically predispose me to like sperm and being a (straight) man makes you angry at the mere suggestion? How is it different for a woman and a man? Why is the mere suggestion so offensive to you? Sorry I hit a nerve. I wasn't trying to, I was actually just making my point with a twisted sense of humour because that's just me.
The thread may be about money to you but the question is about what providers do, and if I don't think money is the only driver, then yeah, that's also what this thread is about. Disagree with me, totally fine. But you're literally belittling a provider responding on a topic about providers saying her comments are irrelevant, and that you somehow know better than she does. Which frankly makes no sense. How does that work?
You could easily reply with an explanation of why you're offended and I'd happily apologize because that's not my intention. The defensive reply really isn't necessary. At the very least, come back with something better to discuss further. Otherwise, please ignore and keep scrolling. I'm not asking for your approval on what you think is relevant. Thanks.
Purely for reference purposes:
Curious.. Do you like oysters? I don't, never have. But I like the juice in the oysters. My family had a yearly oyster fest when I was a kid and I would go around asking people to eat the oyster so I could have the juice. That is a totally random comment with absolutely no meaning or point lol Just highlighting the difference between me making relevant comments and irrelevant ones, as demonstrated here with my oyster juice anecdote. LOL
www.cdc.gov
